Young People are Becoming Less Comfortable with LGBTQ People GLAAD Finds

Started by TempAccount5 pages

My signature is meant to trigger Chinese and Koreans but that's the extent of the trolling here.

If Rob wasn't cherry picking he'd know fully well that I'm not equating pedophilia to homosexuality.

If he was able to add anything of any substance he wouldn't retort to the low-effort homophobia ad hominem attacks.

People are becoming fed up with politicizing LGBTQ people to such an extent that it intrudes into every aspect of pop culture and their lives overall. You now have radical LGBTQers saying how much straight people suck, how straight pride marches should be banned, etc.

Your points were already countered here:

Originally posted by Robtard
And if someone has Black friends, they can't be racist or bigoted towards Black people, right.

Your overreaction to "everything gay" aside, you simply don't patronize a film, show or whatever if it hurts your sensitivities. Say it with your wallet.

But this is nothing new, I'm sure back in the day people freaked out over "miscegenation" that was being "forced" onto them with more and more TV shows, movies, adds and what have you showing interracial couples. [b]FunFact: Uhura and Captain Kirk kissing was the first interracial kiss aired on television, 11/22/1968, the bigots and intolerant types went crazy over that too from what I've read.

Yes, some things can go too far and it's fine to point those out when they actually happen, but you don't throw everything out and/or blanket.

Groups like NAMBLA push pedophilia as something that should be socially acceptable; the LGBTQ community by and large does not support this. [/B]

And here:

Originally posted by Robtard
Because he's using street-level homophobic trolling techniques, eg conflating homosexual with pedophilia.

Because he's making silly faulty comparisons eg comparing weeaboos to homosexuals in society. Last time I checked politicians weren't actively trying to take equal rights away from weeaboos, a president didn't try and amend the Constitution to strip marriage equality from weeaboos.

Because it's Kurk.

And you didn't like it.

Originally posted by Robtard
Your points were already countered here:

And here:

And you didn't like it.

Exactly Rob, because it's Kurk.

Originally posted by mike brown
People use those kinds of arguments all the time. It's not trolling if they mean it.

A troll pretending to be a bigot is functionally no different than a bigot.

I still have no reason to believe he's trolling. Rob and whirly offered nothing in the way of evidence. So I will give the benefit of the doubt and respond as if he means it.

Originally posted by mike brown
I still have no reason to believe he's trolling. Rob and whirly offered nothing in the way of evidence. So I will give the benefit of the doubt and respond as if he means it.

He's definitely not a troll when it comes to those topics. He's a legit racist, homophobic, sexist.

I went to voat again. I went to voat when voat first popped up because it was supposed to be a big deal and super anti-censorship. Lost interest quickly because it was a desert of people can content.

Went back again yesterday and it is nothing but racist, white, incels. Like...it was legit scary and sad. You don't participate on a site like that ironically or to get troll ideas for years like Kurk.

He's legit.

What is voat?

Originally posted by mike brown
I still have no reason to believe he's trolling. Rob and whirly offered nothing in the way of evidence. So I will give the benefit of the doubt and respond as if he means it.

Fair enough.

In the end we are who we pretend to be (paraphrased Vonnegut)

Originally posted by mike brown
What is voat?

"is a open source news aggregator and social networking service where registered community members can submit content such as text posts and direct links. Registered users can then vote for these submissions. Content entries are organized by areas of interest called "subverses."

Never heard of it

Similar to Reddit or 4 Chan or what?

I don't use any of those sites, so can't say, but it seems like a posting board like those, but with up and down votes, so it becomes an echo chamber of whatever is popular at the time and if DDM is correct, seems like an echo chamber for incels and racist to do their incel and racist rants.

Basically 4 Chan then minus the child porn

Originally posted by Robtard
I don't use any of those sites, so can't say, but it seems like a posting board like those, but with up and down votes, so it becomes an echo chamber of whatever is popular at the time and if DDM is correct, seems like an echo chamber for incels and racist to do their incel and racist rants.

This is a spot-on description.

It was originally created in protest of the censorship and bias that reddit had. Reddit was being overrun with corporate shills and a clear censorship bias so some disgruntled redditors with skills created voat. Honesty, voat was a good idea at the time. Just too few people joined it.

However, the racist incels seem to have taken over voat and it's absolutely terrible.

So you either have he option of reddit which is very clearly a Democratic Party and Liberal Shill site (it's terrible: nothing but article after article which is anti-Trump, anti-GOP, anti-theistic, pro-SJW, or anti-Conservative) or voat which is basically a worse version of Stormfront.

What about a normal content aggregator that isn't extremely partisan: I want that site.

Seriously, go to voat's front page. Read the top posts and the comments: it's a wasteland.

Originally posted by Robtard
Your points were already countered here:

And here:

And you didn't like it.

I used the weeaboo example because it was the first to come to mind. I could use the example of environmentalists who go around being annoying at protests, saying how much people who drive SUV's suck. Or Mormons who go around soliciting their religion being annoying. The key phrase here is being annoying.

The radical LGBTQers who go around saying how much straight people suck, how LGBT people should be prioritized, etc give the entire community a bad name. This could be a reason why some people are becoming fed up with it.

This wasn't meant to be a reflection of my personal attitudes but instead pondering on why the attitudes of young people have changed as shown in the poll.

This is one theory. You think Trump is to blame and I disagree. Assuming the participants in this poll were chosen via a fair statistical survey technique, then I don't know how you would come to that conclusion assuming that the majority of young people don't support Trump (could probably find a poll for that too).

Originally posted by dadudemon
He's definitely not a troll when it comes to those topics. He's a legit racist, homophobic, sexist.

I went to voat again. I went to voat when voat first popped up because it was supposed to be a big deal and super anti-censorship. Lost interest quickly because it was a desert of people can content.

Went back again yesterday and it is nothing but racist, white, incels. Like...it was legit scary and sad. You don't participate on a site like that ironically or to get troll ideas for years like Kurk.

He's legit.


I spent maybe 6 minutes on there since I heard Project Veritas was taken down on Reddit. I got the same impression as you tbh. I looked at it again yesterday, and most of the subreddit equivalents on Reddit have been inactive for years.

So as much as I'd like to leave Reddit, Voat can't touch it unfortunately as of now.

Voat is basically KMC

here you go Robtard:

YouTube video

Originally posted by dadudemon
This is a spot-on description.

It was originally created in protest of the censorship and bias that reddit had. Reddit was being overrun with corporate shills and a clear censorship bias so some disgruntled redditors with skills created voat. Honesty, voat was a good idea at the time. Just too few people joined it.

However, the racist incels seem to have taken over voat and it's absolutely terrible.

So you either have he option of reddit which is very clearly a Democratic Party and Liberal Shill site (it's terrible: nothing but article after article which is anti-Trump, anti-GOP, anti-theistic, pro-SJW, or anti-Conservative) or voat which is basically a worse version of Stormfront.

What about a normal content aggregator that isn't extremely partisan: I want that site.

Seriously, go to voat's front page. Read the top posts and the comments: it's a wasteland.

I have to wonder what exactly stops right wingers from making their own subreddit. Like I thought Reddit was pretty much broken down into smaller communities that are interested in a particular topic. Which is what makes it shit to me cause it turns into an echo chamber. But what's stopping the right from making their own echo Chambers on Reddit? The mods or what?

I'd like to hear from someone who posts on voat, whether it's a wasteland.

You're on, Broly. 👆

Originally posted by cdtm
I'd like to hear from someone who posts on voat, whether it's a wasteland.

You're on, Broly. 👆


https://voat.co/v/whatever/3305769
Just something taken right off the first page.

Edit: https://voat.co/v/news/3305689

Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
https://voat.co/v/whatever/3305769
Just something taken right off the first page.

Edit: https://voat.co/v/news/3305689

Pretty stormy weather. A stormfront, as it were.

Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
https://voat.co/v/whatever/3305769
Just something taken right off the first page.

Edit: https://voat.co/v/news/3305689

First topic is stupid.

Second topic should be concerning to any normal person minus all the racist terms.