Are you saying that because I didnt follow what you all said in this thread? Did you want me to say Thor dies so that i can be a God on KMC? Is that how it works? Anyways, before Superman showed up, Maxima was destroying Doomsday AND the portrayal of Superman in that specific comic wasnt great. Prime Superman, even a yr after his fight against Doomsday would destroy DOS Doomsday as well. Again, the portrayal of the characters in that story wasnt top tier. Doomsday struggling to ko Booster Gold who didnt have his shields up. Pounding on Guy Gardner who didnt have his shields up. Sigh, I'm not continuing that. The Doomsday after that would kill Thor but DOS Doomsday would lose against a full powered Thor... badly.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Guess OP can clarify.But does that mean for example we ignore everything else?
So DoS Superman for example, has never shown ANY weakness to Kryptonite?
Come on Darksaint, you know this is how it works. You've done it plenty of times against WWH. Let's not be bias. Consistency needs to be your best friend.
Originally posted by carver9Hmm... Now I'm curious how you've tried to twist this in the past, because I thought it was generally accepted that any feats a character preformed prior to the arc in question should still be valid for that character, barring special circumstances or w/e(such as explicit amps/powerups and whatnot)... Especially in Doomsday's case where he just keeps getting more and more powerful via evolution. So the feats from his Annual should still be valid for DoS DD because they took place thousands of years prior to DoS, but the feats he preformed later on during H/P would not.
I thought we only use fts from DOS. Kinda like how when WWH is used, we only use showings from that chapter?
...But if you tried to pull some of your silly Hulk hijinks (Hulkjinks?) previously, I could see people calling shenanigans and telling you to stfu. /shrug