DOS Doomsdaty vs Unworthy Thor

Started by DarkSaint853 pages

In previous threads, Carv tried to apply Savage's feats to WWH.

Rationale being, WWH is the greatest strongest Hulk ever as per dialogue. So take Savage's greatest feats, and.....go forth.

Thing is, WWH suffered things that Savage didn't. For example, when they transmuted him back to Grey Hulk with a targeted virus and nearly cut his head off....Savage shrugged off being turned into a mouse, iirc.

In short, you couldn't just extrapolate from Savage etc and draw a line upwards.

@Galan...

Nope, that's not what happened. I literally brought up fts from Planet Hulk and was told that I can not use those fts WWH.

Forum rule:

From now on, people using "WWH" as a term to describe Hulk, will have the Hulk in their thread restricted to using feats from the arc.

Thanks for playing Carv.

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
Thor is the weakest character Marvel has to offer.

Hulk one-shots him most of the time. When he doesn't, it's because he's playing with his food.

You'd need Rune King Thor to beat the weakest version of Doomsday.

👆 I have never been so proud of you

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
In previous threads, Carv tried to apply Savage's feats to WWH.

Rationale being, WWH is the greatest strongest Hulk ever as per dialogue. So take Savage's greatest feats, and.....go forth.

Thing is, WWH suffered things that Savage didn't. For example, when they transmuted him back to Grey Hulk with a targeted virus and nearly cut his head off....Savage shrugged off being turned into a mouse, iirc.

In short, you couldn't just extrapolate from Savage etc and draw a line upwards.


Yeah but I think what he's saying is that using that same rational, DD in the Annual out preformed DOS DD so it shouldn't be used.

Why is it more and more people are trying to make their own rules?

It’s the same character. No retcon to say otherwise. Can’t pick and choose what comic issues to debate. No different then people saying ignore the issues that retconned scarlet witches power scope.

Originally posted by -K-M-
Why is it more and more people are trying to make their own rules?

It’s the same character. No retcon to say otherwise. Can’t pick and choose what comic issues to debate. No different then people saying ignore the issues that retconned scarlet witches power scope.


Wait are you against people discussing/debating specific versions of characters?

Because it was not stipulated in the opening post that was the intent. Simple

Originally posted by -K-M-
Because it was not stipulated in the opening post that was the intent. Simple

You mean here? It does say "DOS DD"...

Originally posted by darthgoober
You mean here? It does say "DOS DD"...

Which as mentioned the annual is DOS as well

Originally posted by -K-M-
Which as mentioned the annual is DOS as well

Yes... and WWH is supposed to be stronger and more powerful than Savage Hulk. Saint is saying that since Savage sometimes out preformed WWH then Savage's feats shouldn't be used for WWH, so Carver is saying that the same logic should be used for DOS DD since DD in the Annual out preformed DD is the actual DOS arc. Unless I'm misunderstanding the situation that is, I just kinda jumped in here.

Did DoS DD get outperformed by Annual DD?

I was referring specifically to energy attacks.

Again your making up your own rules. We have rules already assigned for Hulk. Hulks various personalities as noted by Banner are different incarnations of Hulk. Which as you know mindset is a big component for him drawing into his rage and some can draw into more. Look at Iron Man all his suits are not created equal. Most of the time his gadgets don’t always cross over to the “new suit”

Doomsday in the DOS storyline and the annual are the same. There is no additional circumstances to seperate them. They even had a minor retcon in rebirth making that showing in DOS more impressive for Superman and Doomsday. Do we ignore that too? It’s directly related to the DOS story

So the madder the Hulk gets, the stronger he gets.

WWH was the angriest Hulk of all time.

IOW, direct corollary means that he should be the strongest Hulk of all time.

But I bet I can show feats from Hulks PRIOR to WWH (obv not touching WBH lol) that are better.

DoS Doomsday? He was weakened from having been imprisoned for 150,000 years without sunlight, and having been defeated by the Radiant. Yet, DoS DD just walked through a combined JLA energy attack whilst laughing.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Forum rule:

Thanks for playing Carv.

Of course KMC would do this to Hulk (Marvel character) while not restricting this rule across the board. Funny!!!

Alright this looks like it might become a drawn out thing and Hulk's not in this thread so give me just a minute and I'll respond in the discussion thread.

Seriously don't go off topic with the versions of character, DD annual feats included. Thor has axe and hammers

hmm.. i thought there was an idea here in the forums that DoS may not have been quite his Annual levels due to being trapped underground.

That's mainly conjecture, there's no proof that Doomsday was weakened.

Originally posted by darthgoober
Yeah but I think what he's saying is that using that same rational, DD in the Annual out preformed DOS DD so it shouldn't be used.

What nonsense. A random GL trapped Doomsday in that annual and Doomsday had to get stronger and distract the GL to get free.

Doomsday ****ing stomped yellow ring Guy Gardner like an insect when the yellow ring was touted as more powerful than GL ring.