Originally posted by Surtur
If that happened we'd hear tons of crying and whataboutism about nazis and stuff.
How will they complain if they are dead from being wiped out by a militia, though?
"But that's fascism!"
Just wait a bit longer for it to escalate. Then it will happen. Unless something drastic occurs to stop this from escalating, it will get worse and worse until martial law is declared and people start getting shot dead in the streets.
Originally posted by Surtur
I believe in some states courts ruled it was okay to make the klan uncover their faces, right?Do you disagree with those decisions?
Some states do have anti-masks laws and some apply only in certain situations (eg if you're trying to intimidate) I disagree with those too as it's overall subjective, what if you're walking the down the street wearing a full face motorcycle helmet cos you like it and someone feels threatened?
As much as I dislike the KKK cos they're just a facet of the Alt-Right, they should have the freedom to dress up and do their hateful cosplay; which includes covering their faces.
Originally posted by Putinbot1that's not an answer, it's a deflection. I could answer it, but there are too many possible answers. He didn't initiate violence. He didn't file a false police report. He didn't show up wearing black face. He didn't solicit sex from a minor. Etc
Like I said, what didn't he do?
How about instead of deflecting you just tell me what it is that he did that justified assault?
Originally posted by Robtard
Some states do have anti-masks laws and some apply only in certain situations (eg if you're trying to intimidate) I disagree with those too as it's overall subjective, what if you're walking the down the street wearing a full face motorcycle helmet cos you like it and someone feels threatened?As much as I dislike the KKK cos they're just a facet of the Alt-Right, they should have the freedom to dress up and do their hateful cosplay; which includes covering their faces.
The problem is the KKK weren't just dressing up to do cosplay, they were getting violent and murderous and hiding behind masks to escape any consequences for their actions.
I'd have no problem with the laws being specific and having to do with not allowing masks at demonstrations.
Originally posted by mike brownIt's a good answer, I wasn't there and neither were you, so specifics will elude us, However, if you are a known right-wing journalist and agitator, it might not be wise to be with the far-right facing against Antifascists. So what didn't he do?
that's not an answer, it's a deflection. I could answer it, but there are too many possible answers. He didn't initiate violence. He didn't file a false police report. He didn't show up wearing black face. He didn't solicit sex from a minor. EtcHow about instead of deflecting you just tell me why it is the violence was justified?