ANTIFA terrorists attack and bludgeon Journalist

Originally posted by dadudemon
Close but actually not even close.

It's gaslighting when the facts don't add up in the gaslighting narrative. Especially when the gaslighting clearly doesn't match video evidence (posted in this thread) and FBI's rigorous analysis.

Also, it's from a liberal viewpoint, not a rightist viewpoint.

Looks like you were wrong on all accounts and should stop falling for obviously retarded gaslighting.

Disagreed. We have examples of gaslighting and false flags that were not seen as "idiotic" when the Rightist were doing it.

But I've not seen the video of Andy Ngo being attacked, which is what we're talking about, not the general violence that happened between the Proud Boys and these "antifa" masked people. Do you have a link to it? That would defo clear up the rumors.

Originally posted by Surtur
Conservative teen smirks at Native American man: non-stop coverage for days from CNN

Leftists beat down a gay asian reporter who happens to be conservative: 30 seconds of coverage of the story done right before going to a break

Is there a video of this? Cos that would easily clear up the rumors that he got beat up by the Proud Boys for being Asian and gay.

Originally posted by Silent Master
He's just looking for any excuse to support Antifas terrorism.

Good job smearing me, I said the "antifa" people were violent.

Besides, it's your hero Trump who's said in the past "good people on both sides".

Yes and you seem to support their violence, unless of course I missed where you stated they were in the wrong. if so, feel free to repost the quote and I'll apologize.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Yes and you seem to support their violence, unless of course I missed where you stated they were in the wrong. if so, feel free to repost the quote and I'll apologize.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
triggered by neutrality re violence.

^
Approves of violence, if it's against those he disagrees with.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Yes and you seem to support their violence, unless of course I missed where you stated they were in the wrong. if so, feel free to repost the quote and I'll apologize.

I've said** multiple times that I find all the violence regardless of which side starts it at rallies and such to be wrong and you know this, so it seems like you're just trying to smear me and get me in one of your well known Time-Waster-Troll routines. What do we say to the Time-Waster-Troll. Not today.

**said it in the Charlottesville thread and you were there defending the White Supremacist via equalization and whatabout tactics because you're orange hero was being attacked

Originally posted by Silent Master
^
Approves of violence, if it's against those he disagrees with.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Been to court for it too 👆

Sometimes violence is needed. eg What if you see a rape happening and the only way to stop it is to literally beat the rapist down. You get violent and there's nothing wrong with it in the given situation

Originally posted by Robtard
Sometimes violence is needed. eg What if you see a rape happening and the only way to stop it is to literally beat the rapist down. You get violent and there's nothing wrong with it in the given situation

Originally posted by Silent Master
^
Approves of violence, if it's against those he disagrees with.

Did Donald Trump Encourage Violence at His Rallies? True.

You've had no problem when it's your orange leader doing it...

Originally posted by Robtard
Did Donald Trump Encourage Violence at His Rallies? True.

You've had no problem when it's your orange leader doing it...

Only, I don't support Trump nor do I think calls for violence or actual violence are ok(like you seem to). But nice try.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
I don't disagree. Tbh, I'll expand racist fascists propagating hate, and their enablers are asking for kicking in my opinion.

The reason this is disturbing is because you've repeatedly shown you can't correctly identify racists and fascists.

And when you say you've been to court over violence why do I get the feeling it wasn't because you were valiantly defending someone getting raped?

Originally posted by Surtur
The reason this is disturbing is because you've repeatedly shown you can't correctly identify racists and fascists.

And when you say you've been to court over violence why do I get the feeling it wasn't because you were valiantly defending someone getting raped?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Only, I don't support Trump nor do I think calls for violence or actual violence are ok(like you seem to). But nice try.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
I disagree and would say the same of you. Or instead you prefer not to identify them correctly.

So what specifically landed you in court?

Originally posted by Putinbot1
You're a "liberal" like Tim Pool am I right.

Well yeah he is like Tim Pool in that he is labeled a Trumper and alt right for daring to criticize the left. Oh and another thing he has in common with Tim is that he seems to trigger you.

Originally posted by Surtur
So what specifically landed you in court?

Originally posted by Putinbot1
You're a "liberal" like Tim Pool am I right.

Also not a Trump supporter like Pool. *wink* *wink*