ANTIFA terrorists attack and bludgeon Journalist

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
So your claiming he pulled a half assed Jussie Smollet?

No, I made no such claim. i said there were rumors, but I didn't know.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Just went back over all your posts on previous page, you at no point stated the source for your rumors that the Proud boys were the real attackers.

Originally posted by Robtard
Calm the hell down. Surt posted a vid that defo shows some people covered up attacking NGO. Why you coouldn't just do it. Well, I think I know why.

IOW, you're not going to cite your source?

It should be noted this specific Antifa group still has active pages on twitter and facebook. Apparently 3 antifa members were arrested at the protest for assault(not the assault of Ngo) and on Facebook they are asking for donations in order to get people bailed out of jail.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Just went back over all your posts on previous page, you at no point stated the source for your rumors that the Proud boys were the real attackers.

We were talking about me supposedly defending the attack. Which is a lie.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Where exactly did you say it?

BTW, Cite the source for these rumors.

Originally posted by Robtard
Calm the hell down. Surt posted a vid that defo shows some people covered up attacking NGO. Why you couldn't just do it. Well, I think I know why.

Cite the source for the rumors you claim to have heard.

FFS. Another person who doesn't understand what the word "rumor" means, it means a story which is doubtful, uncertain and/or unverified.

So, where exactly did you here this rumor or story which is doubtful, uncertain and/or unverified?

Originally posted by Robtard
^ Time-Waster-Troll

Cite the source of the rumor or story which is doubtful, uncertain and/or unverified.

You don't have to source a rumor, cos it's a rumor.

I'm not asking you to prove the rumor true, I'm asking for the source of the rumor.

Never made the claim you did. Good try though?

Where specifically did you hear the rumor?

Originally posted by Putinbot1
it's pretty much what's expected, people like the proud boys are being stood up to. Lot's of far-right types are giving it large. As is there way and as is also their way they don't realise if you continue to be provocative people will be provoked. The silent majority don't like the far right. Sorry for the guy, but unrestrained free speech has consequences, was he being provocative?

Originally posted by mike brown
what did he do specifically that justifies violence?

Originally posted by Putinbot1
You're a "liberal" like Tim Pool am I right.

Also... the person through cement mixed into a milkshake at him... a milkshake... kinda the symbol of the types of left-wingers (#notall) who think assaulting political opponents are okay. On top of this Andy says it was Antifa.

So there's one of three options

>Either Andy got lucky that the person threw a milkshake at him so he could blame Antifa, lucky coincidence.
>Andy and this dude conspired to seriously injure him and put him in a hospital so he could blame the left. Dude bled from his brain to frame Antifa
>Antifa attacked Andy... like we've seen from them before...

HMMMMMMMM WHICH OF THESE THREE IS THE MOST PLAUSIBLE I WONDER?! DER!