Originally posted by SquallX
Why do people bring this crap up?!Snyder was more fateful to the original concept of Superman than most writers.
Have we forgotten Golden Supe’s wasn’t the boyscott we now see? It was at the beginning of the Post Crisis era that Supe’s has come to been known as this ultra goody goody.
The creators of Superman original concept never wrote him how we now thinks Supe’s was.
Sorry, but why does this matter?
It doesn't matter how Superman's original creators wrote him. They created the character, but their ideas on him as a well-intentioned blue collar thug beating up wife-beaters as very little bearing on Superman now.
Deadpool as created by Liefeld was a generic Deathstroke rip-off, yet his fans would be justifiably angry if he was adapted as such.
Originally posted by NemeBro
Sorry, but why does this matter?It doesn't matter how Superman's original creators wrote him. They created the character, but their ideas on him as a well-intentioned blue collar thug beating up wife-beaters as very little bearing on Superman now.
Deadpool as created by Liefeld was a generic Deathstroke rip-off, yet his fans would be justifiably angry if he was adapted as such.
I was making a point of him being mad about Superman killing Zod. He also failed to realize, Superman has killed multiple times in the Post Crisis era, he nitpicks what he wants, and shut off what he doesn’t like.
Originally posted by SquallX
I was making a point of him being mad about Superman killing Zod. He also failed to realize, Superman has killed multiple times in the Post Crisis era, he nitpicks what he wants, and shut off what he doesn’t like.
Not one person brought up Superman killing Zod. Not a single time. Not once. At all. Zod was only mentioned once in this thread before now, and how he died had nothing to do with it.
So what are you actually talking about?
It is disingenuous to bring up stories that are over sixty years old that are no longer relevant to what Superman means now and haven't been for decades to stifle criticism of a film that did a disservice to said character.
Originally posted by SquallX
I was making a point of him being mad about Superman killing Zod. He also failed to realize, Superman has killed multiple times in the Post Crisis era, he nitpicks what he wants, and shut off what he doesn’t like.
That criticism was always retarded (and would be massively hypocritical coming from any MCU fans), but I dont remember anyone on KMC complaining about it.
Originally posted by NemeBro
Not one person brought up Superman killing Zod. Not a single time. Not once. At all. Zod was only mentioned once in this thread before now, and how he died had nothing to do with it.So what are you actually talking about?
It is disingenuous to bring up stories that are over sixty years old that are no longer relevant to what Superman means now and haven't been for decades to stifle criticism of a film that did a disservice to said character.
It’s because he brought up the heart of Superman or something missing. I guess it’s because Superman wasn’t saving everyone left and right at the same time fighting off Zod and his minions.
That’s why I brought up the fact that Post Crisis Superman has killed multiple times. But it seems for some fans, they’re only mad when Clark kill anything human looking, everything else it’s fine.
Originally posted by SquallXThat doesn't even come close to what I said. Did you finish school?
I was making a point of him being mad about Superman killing Zod. He also failed to realize, Superman has killed multiple times in the Post Crisis era, he nitpicks what he wants, and shut off what he doesn’t like.
Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Sure thing my buddy. But first, quote me naming Zod.
You didn’t need to name Zod. You alluded to him by saying the whole missing what makes Superman Superman.
And we know when someone uses those line, their mostly mad that people died, the destruction of the World, and the neck snapping of Zod.