Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Stormbreaker》》》》 sword.Else Thor wouldn't have bothered getting it.
Your fanboyism is astonishingly high.
Yeah but an Asgardian sword backed by Asgardian level strength is > Iron Man.
Youre not doing yourself any favours by accusing anyone taking the other stance here of being a Fanboy.
Try letting your argument win instead of resorting to insults.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
Yeah but an Asgardian sword backed by Asgardian level strength is > Iron Man.
Why though? What exactly are you basing this on? Tony's tech and weapons are well beyond any conventional Earth stuff. And, based on the fact that he could draw blood when Drax, Nebula, Strange, Hulk, Star-Lord (three of which used bladed weapons against him at different points) and others couldn't, that shows that his tech and weapons are better than a lot of alien and esoteric stuff as well. Hell, according to Joe Russo, Thanos' skin is "almost impenetrable".
So, on what basis are you making that claim? And I ask this, because I have seen you guys use Stormbreaker cutting Thanos as a good feat for Stormbreaker in other threads, because of all the things that failed to damage him, but now Iron Man making him bleed is being used in the opposite manner.
And even beyond that, outright impaling someone >>>>> creating a small scratch that released a single drop of blood. So, even if you assume the Asgardian blade + strength is better, the amount of visible damage it caused is also significantly greater.
^ Well bear in mind I am responding to Josh who is claiming Thanos is more durable than Kurse because Kurse apparently got impaled by a Normal Sword. Im merely showing it wasnt quite that normal a strike.
Im also pointing out that neither Thanos or Kurse are completely impenetrable. But yes granted I went over the top claiming Loki in that situation was definitely > IW Iron Man.
Also I dont recall me personally making that claim about Stormbreaker.
Well, I recall multiple people using that line of argument in favour of Stormbreaker against some DC characters not all that long ago. I could probably dig up the thread if someone really demands it. And there is nothing wrong with that. It -is- a good feat for the weapon.
Because my point is more that, considering everything we see Thanos tank across those two films (including blunt force, piercing, energy and explosive attacks), the fact that only two people managed to actually draw blood is a feat for those two. Not a slight against Thanos.
And I also have no issues with people claiming higher end Asgardians or Asgardian-tier characters, wielding more powerful weapons > Iron Man. But within limits. Like I would say, for example, Valkyrie with her Endgame spear is most likely above Tony in that regard, seeing as she sliced through a Leviathan's armor plating like it was made from cardboard at one point during the final battle.
Anyway, how did the thread even get this far? Neither of these two are as durable as Thanos or Kurse.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
Yeah but an Asgardian sword backed by Asgardian level strength is > Iron Man.Youre not doing yourself any favours by accusing anyone taking the other stance here of being a Fanboy.
Try letting your argument win instead of resorting to insults.
Based on what!? The Mk 50 suit has better feats than Loki! Unless you begin backing your words, you are just giving your opinion.
Originally posted by FrothByte
This thread has been completely derailed by Josh's strawmanning. A bunch of pages in and I've barely seen anyone actually comment on who they think wins the match.
Derailing!? I'm not the one bringing baseless claims and repeating nonsenses.
Bahahaha, says the guy who can't prove a simple sword》》》》》one of marvel's most powerful weapon. Don't worry, no one expected you to do so, because it's plainly stupid.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
^ Going by On Screen Feats, Thor dodging Hulks hits and swatting him across the arena is wayyy more physically impressive than anything Worthy Cap managed so im going with Ragnarok Thor.
😂
King Thor》》》》》》》》》Ragnarok Thor.
Sorry fellow.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Derailing!? I'm not the one bringing baseless claims and repeating nonsenses.Bahahaha, says the guy who can't prove a simple sword》》》》》one of marvel's most powerful weapon. Don't worry, no one expected you to do so, because it's plainly stupid.
😂
King Thor》》》》》》》》》Ragnarok Thor.
Sorry fellow.
When did I ever claim that a simple sword is greater than SB?
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Loki was outbested in EVERY WAY by Thanos. Based on feats, MK50 suit》》》》Loki.
Loki fought Thanos? When? I only remember Thanos blocking a strike off his with an Infinity Gem. And given he was already close up, Thanos could easily grab and choke him.
But we are taking about offensive feats here.
So Again What feats are you talking about?
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
King Thor》》》》》》》》》Ragnarok Thor.Sorry fellow.
He was King Thor at the end of Ragnorak.
Also this has what to do with Worthy Cap?
Originally posted by Darth Thor
Loki fought Thanos? When? I only remember Thanos blocking a strike off his with an Infinity Gem. And given he was already close up, Thanos could easily grab and choke him.But we are taking about offensive feats here.
So Again What feats are you talking about?
He was King Thor at the end of Ragnorak.
Also this has what to do with Worthy Cap?
Loki was terrified of him. That was evident.
Yeah, Loki, one of the fastest and most deceptive villains failed to overcome Thanos' reflexes.
Mk 50 suit managed to bleed the Mad Titan.