Originally posted by Darth Thor
1) No, we literally saw Valkyrie training Hulk. We literally saw Hulk wielding weapons he had never seen him prior to Ragnarok. These are all facts.2) im asking what your point is. Go back and read.
3) Youve yet to prove Caps strength or durability are equal to Thors. He certainly didnt possess Thors combat speed, agility, lightning control, or flight capabilities. You are just speculating.
4) Yes I judge whose better at armed combat by who can disarm Thanos.
I think its pretty clear whose biased here. Hint: the guy who can not give feats to back up his arguments.
1) Yeah. That doesn't make him a great fighter, just a better fighter.
2)Which unarmed Thanos?
3)We had Worthy Cap on screen for less than a minute. You expect him to replicate hours of Thor feats in less than a minute?
Both Thor's durability and strenght got lost when Odin deprived Thor from his powers. Therefore, they are part of his powerset, ergo, Cap being worthy enables this.
I know you are pissed that Thor ain't long top gun in the MCU, just stop trying to erase entire movies in your hatred.
4) No, the better fighter is that who stands the longest in the ring. Again, you should reconsider your judgement.
Originally posted by FrothByte
Nearly all the threads that go past 2 pages are almost always because of either Josh, Quan or H1 repeating what they say... and the rest of us trying to convince them otherwise.
Almost all the threads that go more than two pages concern either Thor's-verse or Superman's-verse.
Fanboyism in this forum is trully hideous.
Originally posted by quanchi112Always going for the low hanging fruit, my friend.
Has self awareness finally attacked your brain.
Originally posted by FrothByteYeah, it was fun when we had more variety here.
Nearly all the threads that go past 2 pages are almost always because of either Josh, Quan or H1 repeating what they say... and the rest of us trying to convince them otherwise.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Did I say so? Where? I said King Thor to make reference to Endgame version of Thor, nothing else.Also, I find it hilarious that you guys believe that being King Thor implies having the Odinforce, when in reality they are independent.
Why not just say Endgame Thor or Fat Thor?
Even Endgame Thor has 3 versions.
1) Ripped with Stormbreaker.
2) Fat Thor with Stormbreaker.
3) Fat Thor with Mjolnir and Stormbreaker.
He faced Thanos in all 3 of those states.
Infinity War (ripped the whole film) had:
1) Thor with no weapon
2) Thor with Stormbreaker
He kind of faced Thanos in both states.
Thor in between Ragnarok and Infinity War was ripped but with no weapon, and seemingly faced Thanos. However its unclear if he unleashed his full lightning on him inside of a spaceship carrying his people.
In All of the above Thor was King of the Asgardians. So no where in the movies is King Thor a title suggested to represent some peak incarnation of Thor.