Appeals Court Grants Trump Administration right to snub sanctuary cities

Started by Surtur4 pages

Originally posted by Emperordmb
"States rights" does not mean the federal government has absolutely no jurisdiction whatsoever. The idea is moreso what powers should justifiably be held by the federal government, and which ones aren't specific enough to the federal government such that they should be devolved to the states so each individual citizen has a more impactful vote over the laws they live under.

Something like border security is inherently a federal issue.

Bingo, this is just as idiotic as the morons who pretend republicans are against any kind of government regulation at all, ever...for the rest of the time.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
🙄

No, I meant exactly what I said. People who come here illegally are breaking the law, dude. If you disagree, then please show me where it's written in the Constitution that people who come here illegally have a right to stay.

Funny you accuse me of not respecting states' rights when leftists like you say that red states have to abide by federal law and allow women to get abortions. Why is it ok for the federal government to intervene in states' business on that issue but not when it comes to deporting illegal aliens?

You'd have a valid point if I ever said those things....but...

So much for rightists being about the individual and having individual responsibility rather than espousing collectivism.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
"States rights" does not mean the federal government has absolutely no jurisdiction whatsoever. The idea is moreso what powers should justifiably be held by the federal government, and which ones aren't specific enough to the federal government such that they should be devolved to the states so each individual citizen has a more impactful vote over the laws they live under.

Something like border security is inherently a federal issue.

And yet states and even individual municipalities have rights to enact legislation on how they treat immigrants. And several federal judges have already ruled the federal government's actions as unconstitutional.

You know I've noticed some on the left wanna be able to sue gun companies over gun deaths.

And these same people, no doubt, would be willing to allow americans in sanctuary cities to sue those cities if an act of violence by an illegal befalls them in those cities. I'm sure of it, I know they'd be consistent on this. And if an illegal murders someone, that persons family can sue the sanctuary city. As I said: I know they'll be consistent here.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
And yet states and even individual municipalities have rights to enact legislation on how they treat immigrants. And several federal judges have already ruled the federal government's actions as unconstitutional.

And here we go again 😉

They can still do their own thing, just not with federal dollars.
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
And yet states and even individual municipalities have rights to enact legislation on how they treat immigrants. And several federal judges have already ruled the federal government's actions as unconstitutional.

First of all, they're not immigrants. They're illegal aliens. I know you leftists love to deceitfully use the term "immigrants" when referring to IA's to make the argument that conservatives "hate immigrants" but you won't get away with that shit with me without me calling you out on it. Immigrants are people who wait in line and go thru a legal process to become citizens (and conservatives for the most part welcome them w/open arms regardless of their skin color). They are not scum who sneak across our borders and make it unfair to those who wait in line and try to do it legally.

Several judges have ruled that way, eh? So what? "Some" means not all of them. I don't give a shit what "some" obviously activist judges say. The law is still the law and illegal aliens have no right to be here.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
First of all, they're not immigrants. They're illegal aliens. I know you leftists love to deceitfully use the term "immigrants" when referring to IA's to make the argument that conservatives "hate immigrants" but you won't get away with that shit with me without me calling you out on it. Immigrants are people who wait in line and go thru a legal process to become citizens (and conservatives for the most part welcome them w/open arms regardless of their skin color). They are not scum who sneak across our borders and make it unfair to those who wait in line and try to do it legally.

Several judges have ruled that way, eh? So what? "Some" means not all of them. I don't give a shit what "some" obviously [b]activist judges say. The law is still the law and illegal aliens have no right to be here. [/B]

Of course you don't care about judges or the law or the constitutional framework that prevents too much executive power to one branch of the legislature.

Until it's a democrat in charge. Then you'll care.

Be honest: you'd give two donkey shits about this if a democrat was president. It's concern trolling, and hey: fair play 👆

“The federal government only super-cedes states rights when dems have power. Other than that, states have no rights.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
“The federal government only super-cedes states rights when dems have power. Other than that, states have no rights.

"Bingo." 👆

Originally posted by Surtur
Be honest: you'd give two donkey shits about this if a democrat was president. It's concern trolling, and hey: fair play 👆

That sums it up pretty much. Supposedly, from what I've heard, Obama deported more IA's than Trump has yet to do yet I never heard any lefties crying about "muh states' rights" back then. The double standards of the left couldn't be any more obvious.

Not only did Obama deport more than Trump, he claimed he deported only the truly serious criminals. Think about that for a second. Leftists have issues cuz Trump is deporting not just serious criminals, Obama was supposedly only doing that and STILL got rid of more.

So that's a shitload of dangerous illegal criminals lol.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
And yet states and even individual municipalities have rights to enact legislation on how they treat immigrants. And several federal judges have already ruled the federal government's actions as unconstitutional.

I thought we were talking about Illegals, not legal immigrants?

When they have no argument they conflate illegals and legals.

Originally posted by Surtur
Be honest: you'd give two donkey shits about this if a democrat was president. It's concern trolling, and hey: fair play 👆

You're right. That's exactly what you're doing. Good self awareness.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
You're right. That's exactly what you're doing. Good self awareness.

*yawn* Stop pretending like you give a shit about the constitution. Just be honest and say this is about Trump.

So Obama already got rid of most of the dangerous criminal ones?

You should be thanking him.

Say it with me now

"Thanks, Obama"

I wish we could celebrate that brah, but you ever hear of this phrase:

repeat offender

Tennessee Man Accused of Killing Infant Has Been Deported 5 Times, ICE says

Was deported multiple times under Obama.

Thanks, I guess?

Originally posted by Surtur
When they have no argument they conflate illegals and legals.

👆