Mueller Tomorrow

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Trump never obstructed justice😂

He tried to, by ordering others. Attempting a crime is still a crime, why Mueller stated Trump could be indicted when he's not longer POTUS 👆

^Cling to it like you're Rose and the titanic has just sank and you've got nothing between you and the icy water but a piece of wood

Originally posted by Robtard
^

Yep, it's Friday

Yep you correctly identified what day it is. See? Democrats got something right this week 🙂

^

rn

*yawn* Same 'ol Rob.

Originally posted by Robtard
He tried to, by ordering others. Attempting a crime is still a crime, why Mueller stated Trump could be indicted when he's not longer POTUS 👆

I'm sure

Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my presidency. I’m f----d

Originally posted by Robtard
He tried to, by ordering others. Attempting a crime is still a crime, why Mueller stated Trump could be indicted when he's not longer POTUS 👆

Yeah it's just a shame that to come to that conclusion it took 2 years of false accusations and an investigation that proved no collusion to get to obstruction.

And since everyone here clearly is most concerned with Russia messing with our elections we need to find out more about how the other candidate utilized russian information to create this dilemma with the president (ha all know that isn't where democrats really want to go with the investigation.)

Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my presidency. I’m f----d
is something an innocent person would say.

You should include the rest of the discussion and not another clip that doesn't truly reflect the sentiment of that statement.

"Collusion" isn't a crime. Trump/campaign did collude when they welcomed the Russian help and then lied about doing it.

Originally posted by Robtard
"Collusion" isn't a crime. Trump/campaign did collude when they welcomed the Russian help and then lied about doing it.

Right, so the literal conspiracy theory was debunked then.

Are you talking about the piss tapes? I didn't think it was true at first, then Trump did something very odd and had people look into whether the tapes existed or not.

Why look for something if you know it can't exist in the first place?

Of course claims were "they were working with Putin". Those were the conspiracy theories. Which were proven false.

Where were these claims specifically proven false? Source it.

Considering Mueller was very specific that Russia interfered, it was to benefit Trump and they're currently interfering/will do so again in 2020. Mueller dispelled the "Russian interference is a hoax" Trumper talking point.

Lol you really wanna sit there and play this game? No thanks.

It was argued for years Trump was working with the russians, he was putins puppet, etc.

Do better, maybe someone else will take your clumsy bait.

This entire discussion's back and forth (on KMC and anywhere else) is so goddamned frustrating, specifically the absolute certainty people on both sides of the argument speak with regarding which illegal activities did or did not take place. Here's what we know:

Trump wasn't charged for collusion or conspiracy because

1) Mueller did not have enough evidence to make a credible case against Trump for conspiracy or collusion, which is a big reason why the several instances of obstructing justice is such a big goddamned deal right now

2) Mueller still would not have tried to prosecute Trump even if he did have a shitload of evidence, because he's made it very clear he stuck to the OLC's opinion* that a sitting president should not and cannot be indicted, but believes Trump could face charges once he's out of office. He left impeachment and legal consequences completely up to Congress.

I believe Mueller very deliberately chose to refer to the OLC's ruling as an opinion, and it fits with his statement that he fears this will be the new normal in how we deal with presidents suspected of corruption.

^ totally wrong

1. Mueller didnt charge hhim because there was no evidence of collusion.

2. Mueller stated in his redo that the OLC guidline did not determine why he didnt charge the president with anything.

3. Trump didnt use any executive privelage, on any matter, he turned over 1.2 million documents, over 500 witnesses, hundreds of subpoenas, and many other things and he came up with nothing.

4. Mueller didnt even run the investigation, its clear he ws the figure head, Weissman ran the investigation.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol you really wanna sit there and play this game? No thanks.

It was argued for years Trump was working with the russians, he was putins puppet, etc.

Do better, maybe someone else will take your clumsy bait.

Your claim was they 'were proven false', I asked you to support that. You didn't.

Yeah, that's the kind of shit I was talking about.

Originally posted by Eternal Idol
Yeah, that's the kind of shit I was talking about.

To me, Mueller pretty much spelled out that there's enough evidence that Trump committed crimes of which he can be charged of. If there wasn't, he wouldn't have said "I can't exonerate him" nor the "he can be indicted once he out of office".

If neither were the case, why bother saying it.

It's also blatantly obvious Trump knew Russia was helping him and he welcomed it, aside from Mueller saying it, we have Trump's behavior towards Putin/Russia before and after the election. Asking them to hack his rival, throwing America under the Bush multiple times in order so Putin can save face. Now is this a crime? I'm not sure, but it happened.

Originally posted by Robtard
He tried to, by ordering others. Attempting a crime is still a crime, why Mueller stated Trump could be indicted when he's not longer POTUS 👆

Incorrect, he was totally within his rights to fire Mueller. Its not a crime to fire your employee.

Perhaps you should get a pocket constituion and read it at bed time.