Superman vs Annihilators

Started by carver914 pages

@Broly, read all of my post and not some of it. I told you my purpose. 🙂

Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
[B]I GROW TIRED OF YOUR LIES, GAMMITE!!! [/B]

😂 😂 ... how is that a lie?

Originally posted by JBL
Had it been their boyfriend Superman, these lowballers would be jumping for joy. They mad because the biggest feats from Superman is when he's massively amped. WF caught the weakling punch with one finger when Superman was not amped. They shy away from that.

Thor and Hype do much better against a bunch of multiversal super gods:

https://imgur.com/a/1oIrZ2H

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
And it's also how he can pretend to have this 'insight'.

Carver: "I bet DS made fun of me in his post.....let me just check...oh look, I was right!!!! I am a prophetic genius!!!"

it’s just good to see how after all the years of me saying it everybody now see’s how fake and full of shit he is.

Originally posted by carver9
Show me it withstanding even one star. I'll wait.

Are you saying the writer had no intention of it being able to haul stars across galaxies?

Originally posted by TheHulkster
We've seen Gladiator bust a planet with one blow. Leg strength is greater than arm strength.

We've seen Gladiator and Hyperion exert enough force against each other to pulverize a planet. That's enormously greater force than needed to just move one.

Multiple blows. He soften the planet up.

Originally posted by h1a8
Are you saying the writer had no intention of it being able to haul stars across galaxies?

Or it could've been false speculation. Are you saying the writers lied when he said Gladiator son SAW Gladiator punch moons to dust and rip black holes in half? Are you saying that when Hulk destroyed a machine with brute strength that could take on the entire Celestial race, the writer didn't know what he was talking about? I'm trying to understand your (terrible) argument here.

Originally posted by h1a8
Multiple blows. He soften the planet up.

Superman along with other Supermen had multiple jumps and soften the planet up.

Originally posted by h1a8
Multiple blows. He soften the planet up.
one punch shown from multiple angles.

Originally posted by carver9
Superman along with other Supermen had multiple jumps and soften the planet up.
I don't know what feat you are referring to but we are talking about the chain feat which has nothing to do with a planet.

Originally posted by h1a8
Multiple blows. He soften the planet up.

All the Supermen that tried to jump off the planet. "This place is a trap made for him. Tested over and over again".

https://www.turboimagehost.com/p/51556806/SmartSelect_20200406-171826_Chrome.jpg.html

Thank me later.

Originally posted by h1a8
I don't know what feat you are referring to but we are talking about the chain feat which has nothing to do with a planet.

Gladiator ft is still better. Ripping black holes with his bare hands and resting suns.

Originally posted by carver9
All the Supermen that tried to jump off the planet. "This place is a trap made for him. Tested over and over again".

https://www.turboimagehost.com/p/51556806/SmartSelect_20200406-171826_Chrome.jpg.html

Thank me later.

You’re an idiot.

Originally posted by carver9
Or it could've been false speculation. Are you saying the writers lied when he said Gladiator son SAW Gladiator punch moons to dust and rip black holes in half? Are you saying that when Hulk destroyed a machine with brute strength that could take on the entire Celestial race, the writer didn't know what he was talking about? I'm trying to understand your (terrible) argument here.

Yes because it's impossible to tear something you can't grab (you can't grab a single atom). Even if a black hole was the size of a grapefruit (it's not) then you have to prove that it takes more than billions of stellar weights to do.

Originally posted by h1a8
Multiple blows. He soften the planet up.

Which would mean that it takes at least 51 jumps for Superman to destroy the planet.

Originally posted by h1a8
Yes because it's impossible to tear something you can't grab (you can't grab a single atom). Even if a black hole was the size of a grapefruit (it's not) then you have to prove that it takes more than billions of stellar weights to do.
This is comics, the impossible happens all the time, stop lowballing.

Originally posted by h1a8
Yes because it's impossible to tear something you can't grab (you can't grab a single atom). Even if a black hole was the size of a grapefruit (it's not) then you have to prove that it takes more than billions of stellar weights to do.
If you’re going down the route that something isn’t possible because of physics etc then no feat would be legit. Stop trying twist logic to suit your needs in a argument.

Originally posted by TheHulkster
Thor and Hype do much better against a bunch of multiversal super gods:

https://imgur.com/a/1oIrZ2H

WF was only ko’d from a punch that could have destroyed thousands of multiverses. He makes those super gods disappear with a wave of his hand.

Originally posted by TheHulkster
Which would mean that it takes at least 51 jumps for Superman to destroy the planet.
all of marvel and hulk at full strength have jumped millions of times and no planetary destruction.

A weakened running on empty Superman > than all of marvel earth. That’s what your point of all jumps are connected proves.

Originally posted by h1a8
Yes because it's impossible to tear something you can't grab (you can't grab a single atom). Even if a black hole was the size of a grapefruit (it's not) then you have to prove that it takes more than billions of stellar weights to do.

I want you to read these and UNDERSTAND it before replying to me. Tell me what you got from it.

https://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/14/146296/2856972-gladiator_star_strike.jpg
https://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/14/146296/2856973-gladiator_star_strike_contained_100_x_ftl.jpg

This...

https://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/14/146296/2857230-g6.jpg