Originally posted by Darth ThorI just said if you accepted the stips I would thrash you. If you are too cowardly to accept when the film came out today I just exposed you.
You literally started this thread saying anyone except D.Thor. Ive completely broken you. Exposed you for the forum clown that you are.
Originally posted by steverules_2
Fiege himself has said Scarlet Witch could’ve beaten Thanos one on onehttps://www.cbr.com/kevin-feige-scarlet-witch-defeat-thanos-avengers/
It's obvious the directors/writers felt that way too, the scene where she levitated Thanos and is slowly destroying him was to illustrate that point, why Thanos risked destroying part of his army to save himself and ordered the aerial bombardment.
But that was always going to happen, Thanos being saved by his ship since Strange already saw all the futures in IW.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I just said if you accepted the stips I would thrash you. If you are too cowardly to accept when the film came out today I just exposed you.
What stips? And why do you get to decide. You ran like a chicken shit when I suggested not me, but let Nib decide, neutrally.
Youre making a fool out of yourself as per usual. Carry on forum clown.
Originally posted by Robtard
It's obvious the directors/writers felt that way too
Only a retard and butthurt Fanboy would think otherwise 👆
Originally posted by Darth ThorThis is your last shot. The two fight in character against each other with nib as the judge. If no Superman fan will accept I will accept Froths challenge.
What stips? And why do you get to decide. You ran like a chicken shit when I suggested not me, but let Nib decide, neutrally.Youre making a fool out of yourself as per usual. Carry on forum clown.
Only a retard and butthurt Fanboy would think otherwise 👆
You will not accept because you are scared.
I go by the facts. We see Thanos prevail. You can pretend he lost but he did not. It matters what you do on game day.
Originally posted by quanchi112
This is your last shot. The two fight in character against each other with nib as the judge. If no Superman fan will accept I will accept Froths challenge.
Ive already messaged Nib to ask if he will be the one and only judge. Just waiting for his reply.
What are your stips?
I suggest an opening from each of us, 1 rebuttal each, then a conclusion (none of these need to fit into 1 post. We can use several posts if thats whats needed). Its DCEU Superman vs MCU Thanos. Thanos has his sword and armour but not Infinity Stones.
Originally posted by Darth ThorThe characters fight in character based on their tendencies and behavior. No unnecessary shit talking in the actual battlezone. Do not make me regret giving you this chance.
Ive already messaged Nib to ask if he will be the one and only judge. Just waiting for his reply.What are your stips?
I suggest an opening from each of us, 1 rebuttal each, then a conclusion (none of these need to fit into 1 post. We can use several posts if thats whats needed). Its DCEU Superman vs MCU Thanos. Thanos has his sword and armour but not Infinity Stones.
Originally posted by quanchi112
The characters fight in character based on their tendencies and behavior. No unnecessary shit talking in the actual battlezone. Do not make me regret giving you this chance.
In character but its a peak performance in character. I.e. feats they have displayed are useable. Power scaling also useable. But thats part of the argumentation.
Of course no shit talking.
And if you pull out of this one thats it. Wont be taking on challenges from you again.
Originally posted by Darth ThorAnything done is usable but if you want to argue Superman tries to kill his opponent right out of the gate that is simply untrue. If stips can be reached and a judge agreed on why would I? I want to debate against Superman the most overrated pos out there.
In character but its a peak performance in character. I.e. feats they have displayed are useable. Power scaling also useable. But thats part of the argumentation.Of course no shit talking.
And if you pull out of this one thats it. Wont be taking on challenges from you again.
Originally posted by NibedicusIn the past I had a judge admit after he rendered his opinion it made no difference what I said he already believed the other character to be stronger thus his opinion was not based on the arguments presented. It was based on his own preconceived notions of the character. Judge this based on the stipulations and arguments presented. I do trust you will. Most do not.
Hi guys. Sorry for the late reply. Very honored that you'd ask. Sure thing, I'll judge. Personally, I'd prefer a 3 judge system tbh. After all, this is my first time judging and I'm worried I'd mess it up. 😛Just let me know when.
Originally posted by quanchi112
In the past I had a judge admit after he rendered his opinion it made no difference what I said he already believed the other character to be stronger thus his opinion was not based on the arguments presented. It was based on his own preconceived notions of the character. Judge this based on the stipulations and arguments presented. I do trust you will. Most do not.
Thanks for the trust, man. I'll do all I can to make sure the trust is well placed. 🙂
Hm. Should I be going into this with an "empty head" mindset? That way, I will be 100% basing my verdict on information, arguments and evidence presented in the BZ and not anything outside (essentially treat me like I've never seen the films).
The advantage of that is that both parties will be entering with the same level of burden of proof and interpretations can be scrutinized from the proof provided.
Disadvantage is that there is a higher burden to the proof meaning that arguments must be presented via media available on the internet or via self-uploading the proof online. Might also use up a lot of room on the replies.
Anyway, we can discuss guidelines when you guys agree on the date/stips.
Still wish there was more than 1 judge, though. O_O solo judging is quite a bit of pressure as this is my first time judging a BZ.
I'll come back to this thread as you guys update on the details.
Originally posted by NibedicusOk, at this point it might just be you but if there is anyone else we agree to I will let you know. Stips are at this point both characters based off their own tendencies and behavior trying to defeat their opponent in character. Thanos has his battle armor, his helmet and dual edged sword. Superman is in his own suit.
Thanks for the trust, man. I'll do all I can to make sure the trust is well placed. 🙂Hm. Should I be going into this with an "empty head" mindset? That way, I will be 100% basing my verdict on information, arguments and evidence presented in the BZ and not anything outside (essentially treat me like I've never seen the films).
The advantage of that is that both parties will be entering with the same level of burden of proof and interpretations can be scrutinized from the proof provided.
Disadvantage is that there is a higher burden to the proof meaning that arguments must be presented via media available on the internet or via self-uploading the proof online. Might also use up a lot of room on the replies.
Anyway, we can discuss guidelines when you guys agree on the date/stips.
Still wish there was more than 1 judge, though. O_O solo judging is quite a bit of pressure as this is my first time judging a BZ.
I'll come back to this thread as you guys update on the details.
We have to wait on all the YouTube clips from endgame.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Ok, at this point it might just be you but if there is anyone else we agree to I will let you know. Stips are at this point both characters based off their own tendencies and behavior trying to defeat their opponent [B]in character. Thanos has his battle armor, his helmet and dual edged sword. Superman is in his own suit.We have to wait on all the YouTube clips from endgame. [/B]
In character but to the best of their abilities In Character. In other words feats/actions they have displayed can be used. Both characters at their peak (but no Infinity Gauntlet).
Out of character would be things we can imagine they would do with their power sets but they have never actually displayed. This isnt a power set debate. Its a DCEU Superman vs MCU Thanos debate.
Agreed?
Originally posted by Darth ThorIf you believe Superman tries to kill his opponent in character out of the gate good luck proving that. We do not take over the character and debate based off powerset completely hijacking the character themselves. So you can use feats all you want but not ignoring the totality of fights and only focusing on brief moments of them. You are free to try whatever angle you want but no powerset debating. I only debate in character not anything else. I have been consistent over the years in arguing based off the tendencies of the characters.
In character but to the best of their abilities In Character. In other words feats/actions they have displayed can be used. Both characters at their peak (but no Infinity Gauntlet).Out of character would be things we can imagine they would do with their power sets but they have never actually displayed. This isnt a power set debate. Its a DCEU Superman vs MCU Thanos debate.
Agreed?
Originally posted by quanchi112
If you believe Superman tries to kill his opponent in character out of the gate good luck proving that. We do not take over the character and debate based off powerset completely hijacking the character themselves. So you can use feats all you want but not ignoring the totality of fights and only focusing on brief moments of them. You are free to try whatever angle you want but no powerset debating. I only debate in character not anything else. I have been consistent over the years in arguing based off the tendencies of the characters.
Okay I dont get from this if you agreed or not?
Fighting their best but not out of character. Yes or no?