Faora vs Wonder Woman

Started by Silent Master33 pages

So you're saying.

Movie A: characters one and two appear to be evenly matched and their feats indicate class 10 strength.

Movie D: character one has feats that suggest class 80 strength

Therefore character two from the first movie is now retroactively class 80?

Originally posted by Silent Master
So you're saying.

Movie A: characters one and two appear to be evenly matched and their feats indicate class 10 strength.

Movie D: character one has feats that suggest class 80 strength

Therefore character two from the first movie is now retroactively class 80?


My example was about being stronger, not evenly matched.

But to answer your question without nitpicking. Since your example gives a contradiction (fiction inconsistency),
Character two is only retroactively class 80 if character one is assumed to be. This is assuming character one did not receive any amp.

But Character two is not class 80 if character one isn't assumed to be (average is argued instead).

So it boils down to how one treats fiction inconsistency.

You're aware that that's not how the rules on this forum work, right? This is just more of you making up rules as you go along so that your favorite character wins.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You're aware that that's not how the rules on this forum work, right? This is just more of you making up rules as you go along so that your favorite character wins.

So how does it go here or what is your take?
Character two proves stronger or as strong as character one (who is class 10) in movie A. Character one has a class 80 feat in movie D.

Is character one now class 80?
If so then is character two still stronger or as strong as character one?

Originally posted by FrothByte
Nope. Please quote yourself where you actually specified what moves WW did to show that she was more skilled. Or better yet, just list them down now. Surely even a simpleton like you could do something this simple.
Why would I put any more effort into a dense troll like yourself. You ignireevudence and just spam.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Why would I put any more effort into a dense troll like yourself. You ignireevudence and just spam.

Because when you make a claim, you actually need to back yourself up with proof. Not just repeating your opinion. Now, what h2h feats does WW that makes her better than Faora?

Originally posted by FrothByte
Because when you make a claim, you actually need to back yourself up with proof. Not just repeating your opinion. Now, what h2h feats does WW that makes her better than Faora?
I post evidence you say it is not evidence. Pass. You are too obstinate to have a debate with.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I post evidence you say it is not evidence. Pass. You are too obstinate to have a debate with.

Yes, you post a video in which I ask you to clarify what it's proving. Then you run away and refuse to answer. Pussy.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Yes, you post a video in which I ask you to clarify what it's proving. Then you run away and refuse to answer. Pussy.
I have. Not going into more detail because I saw you ignore detailed responses in the battlezone you refused to participate in you coward.

Originally posted by h1a8
So how does it go here or what is your take?
Character two proves stronger or as strong as character one (who is class 10) in movie A. Character one has a class 80 feat in movie D.

Is character one now class 80?
If so then is character two still stronger or as strong as character one?

You know that characters don't share feats. if you want to prove Faora can do something, you have to show her doing it.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I have. Not going into more detail because I saw you ignore detailed responses in the battlezone you refused to participate in you coward.

No you didn't. If you did it would be easy for you to just quote yourself. Go ahead, I can wait.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You know that characters don't share feats. if you want to prove Faora can do something, you have to show her doing it.

So you want to troll and not tell us your take on the situation I gave?

Again what’s your take to the situation I gave?

Your entire argument is based on sharing feats, which you know isn't valid.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Your entire argument is based on sharing feats, which you know isn't valid.

What is your take on that situation?

Originally posted by h1a8
What is your take on that situation?

My take is your argument doesn't work because it relies on sharing feats, which isn't valid. a fact that you're aware of.

Originally posted by Silent Master
My take is your argument doesn't work because it relies on sharing feats, which isn't valid. a fact that you're aware of.

Last chance.
What is your take on THAT SITUATION?

Originally posted by h1a8
Last chance.
What is your take on THAT SITUATION?

My take on the situation is that your argument isn't valid for the reasons already given.

Originally posted by Silent Master
My take on the situation is that your argument isn't valid for the reasons already given.

Trolling confirmed. Debate is over.
You dont want to discuss things in all seriousness and ignore questions then thats fine.

Originally posted by h1a8
Trolling confirmed. Debate is over.
You dont want to discuss things in all seriousness and ignore questions then thats fine.

Pointing out where your argument failed is discussing things in all seriousness. Be honest for once in your life.

Originally posted by FrothByte
No you didn't. If you did it would be easy for you to just quote yourself. Go ahead, I can wait.
No, you just pretended she did not show any skill so it is pointless. You ignored her own dialogue from your own clip.