Faora vs Wonder Woman

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
No that’s actually screen feats unless you haven’t actually watched Justice League

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
No that’s actually screen feats unless you haven’t actually watched Justice League

Characters have highs and lows (even flash). If a character has variable showings then u just can't take the characters best showing and state that he was operating at the same level in another instance.

But that's moot. Let's say Superman was moving as fast as flash (he was a little slower). Prove that Faora, in those two particular blitzes, moved slower than Flash has.

At 0:16 she blitzes instantly in bursts. Each bursts is like an instant teleport with 0 time elapsed.
YouTube video

Originally posted by h1a8
"regardless of feats" is not a complete sentence. It is meaningless without the entire thought.

No, it really isn't as the whole sentence was "to be peers in speed to Superman regardless of feats". If she is a peer in speed regardless of feats, that means feats don't matter

If you're done dodging, how about answering my question.

Originally posted by Silent Master
No, it really isn't as the whole sentence was "to be peers in speed to Superman regardless of feats". If she is a peer in speed regardless of feats, that means feats don't matter

If you're done dodging, how about answering my question.

Is Thanos stronger than Hulk regardless of any future feats Hulk gets (assuming no amp)? In other words, if Hulk gets a way better feat in the future without receiving any amps then will Thanos still be stronger?

Stop dodging and answer my question.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, you have you ignore all showings using complex movements demonstrating skill. Pointless. You are a troll.

Nope. Please quote yourself where you actually specified what moves WW did to show that she was more skilled. Or better yet, just list them down now. Surely even a simpleton like you could do something this simple.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Stop dodging and answer my question.

Your question is trolling when I just explained to you

Originally posted by h1a8
Is Thanos stronger than Hulk regardless of any future feats Hulk gets (assuming no amp)? In other words, if Hulk gets a way better feat in the future without receiving any amps then will Thanos still be stronger?

Originally posted by h1a8
Your question is trolling when I just explained to you

Do feats matter?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Do feats matter?

Does any future feats for a character matter in establishing where he stands in relation to another character in a forum fight if it has been established in fiction how that character compares to the other character in direct confrontation, assuming no future amps?

The answer to that question is no.
The answer to the general "Do feats matter" is "It depends ".

For example, answer the following:

Is Thanos stronger than Hulk regardless of any future feats Hulk gets (assuming no amp)? In other words, if Hulk gets a way better feat in the future without receiving any amps then will Thanos still be stronger?

Either feats matter or they don't.

Which is it?

Edit: Once that is answered we can move on to any nuance that might be involved.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Either feats matter or they don't.

Which is it?

Edit: Once that is answered we can move on to any nuance that might be involved.

Does any future feats for a character matter in establishing where he stands in relation to another character in a forum fight if it has been established in fiction how that character compares to the other character in direct confrontation, assuming no future amps?

The answer to that question is no.
The answer to the general "Do feats matter" is "It depends ".

For example, answer the following:

Is Thanos stronger than Hulk regardless of any future feats Hulk gets (assuming no amp)? In other words, if Hulk gets a way better feat in the future without receiving any amps then will Thanos still be stronger?

As I said, we can get into the nuances involved after we set a foundation for the conversation.

Do feats matter?

Originally posted by Silent Master
As I said, we can get into the nuances involved after we set a foundation for the conversation.

Do feats matter?

Now you are trolling.

Trying to debate in good faith isn't trolling.

Now, we can get into the nuances involved after we set a foundation for the conversation. Do feats matter?

You are trolling at this point. No need to debate any further.

Trying to debate in good faith isn't trolling.

Now, we can get into the nuances involved after we set a foundation for the conversation. Do feats matter?

Person 1: Does feats matter?
Person 2: It depends.
Person 1: Again, Does feats matter?

I don't know how that's not trolling.

To move this along, I'll play your little game.

Give examples of when feats matter and when they don't.

Originally posted by h1a8
Now you are trolling.

SM trolls occasionally, you troll most of the time with bullshit logic you know is bullshit.

Originally posted by Silent Master
To move this along, I'll play your little game.

Give examples of when feats matter and when they don't.

Later strength feats that occur after it has been established, through direct confrontation, character A being stronger than character B dont matter when determining whether character A is stronger than character B when no amp of any kind has occurred.

For example, Thanos is stronger than Hulk. If Hulk lifts a mountain in the next film without receiving any type of amp then Thanos is still stronger than Hulk. Therefore the feat where Hulk lifted a mountain doesn't matter towards determining whether Thanos is stronger than Hulk.

Where it does matter?
When two characters who never engaged in combat or a test of strength then their feats matter when determining who is stronger.