Trump campaign employs racist beauty queen.

Originally posted by TempAccount

Ditto for the black-on-black crime tweet.

"Don't talk about this problem because this other problem isn't solved yet" is a fallacy of relative privation, or an appeal to worse problems fallacy. That one problem affects you and might be worse does not imply that another problem doesn't merit being addressed.

If you disagree with this, you're a retard. 👆

Originally posted by Adam_PoE

You do know there is some truth to that right?

Just because someone says something and you don’t like it, does not make you a racist.

Originally posted by NemeBro
She said "But black on black crime" in an attempt to shut down discussion about police brutality on blacks, so on top of being a racist, she's also a retard, and anyone who agrees with her reasoning is also a retard tbh.

"Don't talk about this problem because this other problem isn't solved yet" is a fallacy of relative privation, or an appeal to worse problems fallacy. That one problem affects you and might be worse does not imply that another problem doesn't merit being addressed.

If you disagree with this, you're a retard. 👆

I disagree with it. Police brutality in this day stems not from racism as whole, the number of racist police are minute. It stems from blacks unable to yes, take responsibility for their mistake.

A cop stops you, do you start acting like an idiot, or do you carry yourself like an adult?

Before the civil rights movements, less than 15 percent of blacks children made up the one parent household, now its 70 percent. And blacks only make up 13% of the overall population.

Blacks indeed needs to stop whining and start taking responsibilities for their mistakes. Until then, the cycle won’t change.

Originally posted by NemeBro
She said "But black on black crime" in an attempt to shut down discussion about police brutality on blacks, so on top of being a racist, she's also a retard, and anyone who agrees with her reasoning is also a retard tbh.

"Don't talk about this problem because this other problem isn't solved yet" is a fallacy of relative privation, or an appeal to worse problems fallacy. That one problem affects you and might be worse does not imply that another problem doesn't merit being addressed.

If you disagree with this, you're a retard. 👆

Originally posted by NemeBro
She said "But black on black crime" in an attempt to shut down discussion about police brutality on blacks, so on top of being a racist, she's also a retard, and anyone who agrees with her reasoning is also a retard tbh.

"Don't talk about this problem because this other problem isn't solved yet" is a fallacy of relative privation, or an appeal to worse problems fallacy. That one problem affects you and might be worse does not imply that another problem doesn't merit being addressed.

If you disagree with this, you're a retard. 👆

When's it ever discussed on the left, though?

That's a problem with politics in general. Everyone always says "Hey. We have a problem. And it's THOSE GUYS."

When do you ever really hear "We also have another problem. We need to clean up our act."

As in self criticism, or saying anything that requires more then getting angry, but may require some actual work and self improvement? (No, people getting upset about privilege doesn't count, because a leftist feeling bad about being privileged doesn't motivate any lifestyle changes outside of a crocodile tear at the gated community he lives in.)

Originally posted by NemeBro
She said "But black on black crime" in an attempt to shut down discussion about police brutality on blacks, so on top of being a racist, she's also a retard, and anyone who agrees with her reasoning is also a retard tbh.

"Don't talk about this problem because this other problem isn't solved yet" is a fallacy of relative privation, or an appeal to worse problems fallacy. That one problem affects you and might be worse does not imply that another problem doesn't merit being addressed.

If you disagree with this, you're a retard. 👆

I read the entire thread, not a single valid explanation so far has been given for how she is racist.

Anyone wanna try to take a crack what others in this thread have utterly and completely failed at?

Originally posted by TempAccount
Like I said, I don't know what context she said it in, but if she used it as a red herring to get out of addressing police brutality, then yeah she's clueless.

It's definitely "whataboutism" but so? The point was to highlight hypocrisy. When democrats deflected from Ilhan Omars anti-semitism by going "what about Steve King?" was that them participating in anti-semitism? Does a Republican anti-semite somehow cancel out a Democrat anti-semite? Is that how this works?

Either this kind of tactic is okay or it's not. It can't be racist or bigoted for one side, but not the other. It can't be okay when it comes to matters related to jews, but not with blacks. It can't be okay when someone on the left does it, but it's racism, etc. from folk on the right. There needs to be consistency(speaking of consistency, I thought the left didn't feel minorities could even be racist, or does that special rule just apply to the left leaning minorities?)

And she'd be clueless if she said blacks experience no police brutality or racism. As far as I can tell she tweeted out uncomfortable facts. So okay you've called her clueless, does that mean she is also being racist? If so, can you specifically highlight the racism here?

Oh and, if she had responded to someone discussing black on black violence with "what about all the white on white violence" or something like that, do you feel she'd be labeled racist by the left? Since whites are most likely to be on the receiving end of violence from other whites, just like blacks are most likely to be killing other blacks. It's just blacks commit murder at a higher rate than whites and in fact commit a majority of homicides in the country. Wait, is that fact racist too? Is the FBI racist for compiling that stat?

Originally posted by Surtur
It's definitely "whataboutism" but so? The point was to highlight hypocrisy. When democrats deflected from Ilhan Omars anti-semitism by going "what about Steve King?" was that them participating in anti-semitism? Does a Republican anti-semite somehow cancel out a Democrat anti-semite? Is that how this works?

Either this kind of tactic is okay or it's not. It can't be racist or bigoted for one side, but not the other. It can't be okay when it comes to matters related to jews, but not with blacks. It can't be okay when someone on the left does it, but it's racism, etc. from folk on the right. There needs to be consistency(speaking of consistency, I thought the left didn't feel minorities could even be racist, or does that special rule just apply to the left leaning minorities?)

And she'd be clueless if she said blacks experience no police brutality or racism. As far as I can tell she tweeted out uncomfortable facts. So okay you've called her clueless, does that mean she is also being racist? If so, can you specifically highlight the racism here?

Oh and, if she had responded to someone discussing black on black violence with "what about all the white on white violence" or something like that, do you feel she'd be labeled racist by the left? Since whites are most likely to be on the receiving end of violence from other whites, just like blacks are most likely to be killing other blacks. It's just blacks commit murder at a higher rate than whites and in fact commit a majority of homicides in the country. Wait, is that fact racist too? Is the FBI racist for compiling that stat?

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Rustled Jimmies.

^has no valid response

Originally posted by Surtur
^has no valid response

Originally posted by Putinbot1
seems valid, there is no need to be upset.

And yet you got super triggered over my response.

My bad, too many sentences?

Originally posted by NemeBro
She said "But black on black crime" in an attempt to shut down discussion about police brutality on blacks, so on top of being a racist, she's also a retard, and anyone who agrees with her reasoning is also a retard tbh.

No, she's right. Policy Brutality is more of a problem against white people, per capita. Proportionally represented, black people have less of a chance of police brutality.

The left has brainwashed us for so long that now even obvious facts are seen as racist by intelligent people like you. They are hidden and obfuscated so well that almost no one outside of criminology knows about these things. It's racist to even talk about them (this is literally what one of my professors said when introducing some of the topics).

Blacks harm blacks far more than anyone else. It's a landslide. Biggest homicide problem in American is black-on-black violence. Ignoring it is racist. Her pointing out that fact is not racist. Calling her racist and detracting from the issue is the actual racist position but you'd never know that because of the left making any discussions about this topic taboo.

Originally posted by NemeBro
"Don't talk about this problem because this other problem isn't solved yet" is a fallacy of relative privation, or an appeal to worse problems fallacy. That one problem affects you and might be worse does not imply that another problem doesn't merit being addressed.

If you disagree with this, you're a retard. 👆

I didn't see her do that in the cherry picked quotes. Also, it's pretty easy to say, "Address both or all."

Edit - And I remember almost 20 years ago how it was leftist and progressive to talk about how oppressive Islam is of women, in general. It was "woke" to talk about anti-feminist hijabs and the like. Now, you're considered racist for not wanting women...to...be oppressed and treated like objects? WTF? How backwards can you get?

Originally posted by Surtur
And yet you got super triggered over my response.

My bad, too many sentences?

Probably too many multisyllable words for him lol.

You know, I do hate it when white people gives black people passes because of their skin color.

I also love the whole, they’ve been slaves in this country for 400 yrs, of course they need a pass. So damn condescending.

I think I need to start using the black card so I can get away with shit.

Originally posted by SquallX
You know, I do hate it when white people gives black people passes because of their skin color.

I also love the whole, they’ve been slaves in this country for 400 yrs, of course they need a pass. So damn condescending.

I think I need to start using the black card so I can get away with shit.

👆

Do it. Play up their white guilt just to troll them and watch them slowly cringe into implosion and they disappear into a black hole of white guilt from cringing so hard. Use their condescending* "wokeness" against them.

*If we are being honest, the correct term is racist, not condescension.

Originally posted by SquallX
You know, I do hate it when white people gives black people passes because of their skin color.

I also love the whole, they’ve been slaves in this country for 400 yrs, of course they need a pass. So damn condescending.

I think I need to start using the black card so I can get away with shit.

You need to act as deranged as possible, or it won't work.

YouTube video

And hey, once word gets out about how crazy militant you are, maybe you can make a job of it in the comic book industry:

As I reported earlier this week, Wong is one of Marvel Comics’ newest writers working with Greg Pak on Aero as well as working on a number of one shots that crossover with Marvel’s Future Fight mobile game. She appears to have landed the job at Marvel Comics after not only attacking Stan Lee, but after calling current Marvel Comics editor-in-chief C.B. Cebulski a racist.
Marvel Comics is no stranger to hiring creators like Wong. They recently employed Gabby Rivera, who wrote an America Chavez series for them. Rivera would indicate that she was “triggered af at the mere sigh/presence of white dudes.”
Marvel still employees Sana Amanat who previously tweeted, “That’s the future once we start inter-breeding. Brown will rule. Muhahahaha.” She would also tweet, “One day, we will all be brown. (And NO that does not mean I plan to spread shariah law).”
They also employee Saladin Ahmed who pressured Kellogg’s to change their cereal cover box art claiming it was racist. Ahmed has also called for the denial of service to certain individuals. Following Congressman Maxine Water’s call for people to publicly harass other people, Ahmed stated, “denying a person service because they are effectively a neo-Nazi operative is beautiful and moral. It’s not very complicated.”
Marvel also employees Ta-Nehisi Coates who wrote, “White America is a syndicate arrayed to protect its exclusive power to dominate and control our bodies.” He would also describe 9/11 firefighters and police trying to save people, “They were not human to me. Black, white, or whatever, they were menaces of nature; they were the fire, the comet, the storm, which could — with no justification — shatter my body.”
There definitely appears to be a trend at Marvel Comics given the comments of the people they have hired in recent years.
What do you make of Alyssa Wong’s alleged comments? Do you think Marvel will do anything about them?

Originally posted by Robtard
^
Ad hominem fallacy

Shut up, pawn prawn. You look like an old dusty rag.

All these threads Whirly makes are inane and uninformed.

Originally posted by Robtard
^
Ad hominem fallacy

Originally posted by dadudemon
👆

Do it. Play up their white guilt just to troll them and watch them slowly cringe into implosion and they disappear into a black hole of white guilt from cringing so hard. Use their condescending* "wokeness" against them.

*If we are being honest, the correct term is racist, not condescension.

As much as I would love to do it just once, I don’t think my Pride would allow it. Not only that, since I’m in the military, my battle buddies would think I’m a retard, laugh in my face then report me for being stupid.

Here’s another example of whites insulting blacks
YouTube video
**** her and her ideologies in regards to blacks.