Originally posted by quanchi112
Dc bias reeks its ugly head. Deep down they know it would kill him.
You do realise you are responding to a guy who agreed on page 1 that Supes might just solo this fight right?
Originally posted by ShadowFyre
Yall don't think Thanos sword would cut Supes? After what it did to Caps shield? Ridiculous
Not saying it couldnt. Just questioning it. And not been convinced by Joshs argument.
You seem to think its a given because after multiple direct blows from it cut Caps shield.
So I have to ask, whats the best durability feat of Caps shield?
Originally posted by Darth Thor
You do realise you are responding to a guy who agreed on page 1 that Supes might just solo this fight right?Not saying it couldnt. Just questioning it. And not been convinced by Joshs argument.
You seem to think its a given because after multiple direct blows from it cut Caps shield.
So I have to ask, whats the best durability feat of Caps shield?
I have presented valid reasoning.
Thanos Sword》》》》WW's
Superman's skin = or 《 DD's.
Originally posted by Darth ThorYes, he is not reasonable at all I get it.
You do realise you are responding to a guy who agreed on page 1 that Supes might just solo this fight right?Not saying it couldnt. Just questioning it. And not been convinced by Joshs argument.
You seem to think its a given because after multiple direct blows from it cut Caps shield.
So I have to ask, whats the best durability feat of Caps shield?
Do you believe stormbreaker could kill Superman?
Originally posted by quanchi112
Do you believe stormbreaker could kill Superman?
I havent even given an opinion on Thanos sword cutting him or not. Again, I have questioned the notion, and not heard any reasonable justifications in response.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
I have presented valid reasoning.Thanos Sword》》》》WW's
Superman's skin = or 《 DD's.
facepalm
Except this is about Thanos Sword vs Supermans skin and has nothing to do with Wonder Woman and Doomsday.
So your logic is moot IMO.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Well you are too dumb to see the difference between comics and movies. Kindly leave. Details matter, idiot.No, he tossed her aside and already casually reacted and threw her aside. With her all out cheapshotting him he still wins with one arm.
He is more skilled, stronger, and more durable than she is.
After combat starts who cares? Should he not use the tools he has amassed? Do you realize how combat works?
Thanos already won. It is inevitable. A loser is someone who cannot beat a pissed off human. A loser is someone who needed another man to save his mommy. A loser is someone who needs the same guy that kicked your ass to reclaim your childhood home because the bank repossessed it. A loser who is someone whose face does not even show up in a cameo. A loser is someone who cries when you kill your fathers murderer who wanted to commit genocide. Need I go on?
Thanos won. Let it go.
Make me, pussy.
With the stone. He was getting overpowered before that.
Feats say otherwise. Carol no sold his attack and he looked scared.
The combat started with his fleet attacking them. And Thanos still managed to find a way to lose despite that surprise attack.
A loser is someone who dies twice in the same movie and has all of his plans foiled. Or someone who writes paragraphs defending that character.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Or the characters are just fast enough to block/dodge them. Not necessarily that the are slow, but that the heroes implicitly fast (no slow motion effects are applied to enhance it).Also, bullets can't be seen because they don't emit light and therefore aren't that visible. Special ammo, like tracing bullets can be seen and that doesn't make them slower.
Lol wut.
A bullets speed indeed wouldn't be changed in your scenario, but that isn't the same as the energy blasts from Iron Man just being as fast(or faster) than bullets because...there is no legit reason provided. You just talk about special effects.
Those fast enough to react to a repulsor blast are just that: fast enough to react to a repulsor blast. If you want that feat to mean something you need to come show how fast those blasts actually are. You can't just assume they are as fast as bullets because why would you?
Originally posted by Darth ThorSo you will dodge the question because it shows you are not being honest. Look if you want to pretend it might not to create a false narrative in wake of our battlezone at least have the guts to be honest about it.
I havent even given an opinion on Thanos sword cutting him or not. Again, I have questioned the notion, and not heard any reasonable justifications in response.facepalm
Except this is about Thanos Sword vs Supermans skin and has nothing to do with Wonder Woman and Doomsday.
So your logic is moot IMO.
So you ignore power scaling and dodge questions. If you do not have the integrity to answer questions or logically look at this issue please stop insulting the intelligence of those that do.
No, it is not but the fact you will not even answer speaks volumes about your integrity.
Originally posted by PsychotronBy all means stick around and make an ass of yourself confusing the two.
Make me, pussy.With the stone. He was getting overpowered before that.
Feats say otherwise. Carol no sold his attack and he looked scared.
The combat started with his fleet attacking them. And Thanos still managed to find a way to lose despite that surprise attack.
A loser is someone who dies twice in the same movie and has all of his plans foiled. Or someone who writes paragraphs defending that character.
He had one arm and he rectified the situation. Tossed her power the stone away casually and then beat her with it.
Thanos looked stunned but quickly capitalized. Who cares? Superman got beat by Batman. His gf looked scared right before he was going to kill him. Superman was not able to defend himself or even plead for his own life.
All armies were engaging it is fair combat. Without carol showing up. They lose. Without strange assessing time travel they lose. Without the rat freeing Lang they lose. Without all the various heroes attacking Thanos and trying to doglike him they lose.
Thanos already won in Iw. He killed half the universe. The movie says he won multiple times. He beat the avengers asses. Tony was scared of him. Thor was depressed for five years and cried at the mention of his name. The universe was traumatized by him. A loser is someone who cannot save his own mother or needs the same man who did get his house back. No wonder you love the guy so lame they gave not even made plans to bring him back since the general audience has rejected your weak hero.
😂
Thanos is in the biggest box office film of all time your guys last film flopped. 😂 😂 😂
Originally posted by Darth Thor
You do realise you are responding to a guy who agreed on page 1 that Supes might just solo this fight right?Not saying it couldnt. Just questioning it. And not been convinced by Joshs argument.
You seem to think its a given because after multiple direct blows from it cut Caps shield.
So I have to ask, whats the best durability feat of Caps shield?
Just as good as any of Supermans feats aside from the Nuke. And it absorbs energy. I see your point, I just think Caps shield js more durable than Supermans foreskin
Originally posted by Surtur
Lol wut.A bullets speed indeed wouldn't be changed in your scenario, but that isn't the same as the energy blasts from Iron Man just being as fast(or faster) than bullets because...there is no legit reason provided. You just talk about special effects.
Those fast enough to react to a repulsor blast are just that: fast enough to react to a repulsor blast. If you want that feat to mean something you need to come show how fast those blasts actually are. You can't just assume they are as fast as bullets because why would you?
There's no legit reason provided that a bullet is faster than blaster bolts or lasers either.
You have no prove either that an inferior weapon like a pistol's ammo would be able to hit Thanos whilst this one was blocking superior weaponry.
Speculation on both sides, except I think it's more logical that the superior weapon is indeed superior.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
There's no legit reason provided that a bullet is faster than blaster bolts or lasers either.You have no prove either that an inferior weapon like a pistol's ammo would be able to hit Thanos whilst this one was blocking superior weaponry.
Speculation on both sides, except I think it's more logical that the superior weapon is indeed superior.
Blaster bolts aren't as fast as bullets lol.
The fact is you're using a reaction feat to something that we can't even know for sure what the speed is in order to counter someone with a vast amount of speed in comparison.
You're stretching this dude. Thanos isn't gonna be able to react. This is why it is irrelevant if his weapons can cut Superman.
I think I found this amazing feat Josh talks about:
It's at 2:35. If you watch, you'll notice Iron Man begins firing blasts, prior to the blast Thanos blocks he fires a blast that misses. The next blast Thanos blocks. So it's not like he didn't know it was coming. I don't get why this means he can react to Superman. Maybe Josh is thinking of another feat.
Originally posted by SurturWW hit him with her shield, lasso, and her head.
Blaster bolts aren't as fast as bullets lol.The fact is you're using a reaction feat to something that we can't even know for sure what the speed is in order to counter someone with a vast amount of speed in comparison.
You're stretching this dude. Thanos isn't gonna be able to react. This is why it is irrelevant if his weapons can cut Superman.
😂
Quit being dumb.
Originally posted by Surtur
Blaster bolts aren't as fast as bullets lol.The fact is you're using a reaction feat to something that we can't even know for sure what the speed is in order to counter someone with a vast amount of speed in comparison.
You're stretching this dude. Thanos isn't gonna be able to react. This is why it is irrelevant if his weapons can cut Superman.
Based on what are blaster bolts slower than bullets?