Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Please D.Thor. Stop it, will you? You know the forum's rules, you can't give attributes to characters without the basis of evidence.There is no indicator that Superman's skin is more durable than DD's and ergo, no evidence to suggest that Diana couldn't amputate Superman's limbs.
Diana's sword, although magical, has no special attributes besides glowing, nor any feats to suggest it is more powerful than Thanos' IS.
1) The fact that her sword glows means any comparisons to Thanos's sword are not completely reliable.
2) The fact that Superman was infected by Kryptonite means any comparisons between Superman and Doomsday reaction to the Nuke are not completely reliable.
3) The fact that the Nuke was mostly heat and radiation makes any comparisons to getting struck by Thanos's sword unreliable.
4) For the record, Diana's sword and shield do have some decent feats, and neither have been shown to be breakable so far. And neither has Superman's skin through pure brute force (sans Kryptonite).
Originally posted by Darth Thor
1) The fact that her sword glows means any comparisons to Thanos's sword are not completely reliable.2) The fact that Superman was infected by Kryptonite means any comparisons between Superman and Doomsday reaction to the Nuke are not completely reliable.
3) The fact that the Nuke was mostly heat and radiation makes any comparisons to getting struck by Thanos's sword unreliable.
4) For the record, Diana's sword and shield do have some decent feats, and neither have been shown to be breakable so far. And neither has Superman's skin through pure brute force (sans Kryptonite).
1) Since when something that glows means it can cut better? Based on feats Thanos' sword》 WWs
2) That still doesn't show that Superman's skin is tougher than DDs
3) DD was cut.
4) Not as much as Thanos' sword.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
1) Since when something that glows means it can cut better? Based on feats Thanos' sword》 WWs2) That still doesn't show that Superman's skin is tougher than DDs
3) DD was cut.
4) Not as much as Thanos' sword.
1) Does Thanos sword emit heat? No? Moot comparison then.
2) Moot point. This is about Thanos sword vs Supermans skin. Its like me saying Iron Mans kick cut Thanos, and Supermans punches have wayyy better feats than Iron Mans kick, therefore Superman one shots Thanos 😬
Are you beginning to see how ridiculous your argument is yet?
3) Moot point. See above
4) Really? Has Thanos sword taken a small nuke energy blast like the one emitted from Doomsday? Because Wonder Womans Shield And Supermans skin has.
See how ridiculous this is getting?
Originally posted by Darth Thor
1) Does Thanos sword emit heat? No? Moot comparison then.2) Moot point. This is about Thanos sword vs Supermans skin. Its like me saying Iron Mans kick cut Thanos, and Supermans punches have wayyy better feats than Iron Mans kick, therefore Superman one shots Thanos 😬
Are you beginning to see how ridiculous your argument is yet?
3) Moot point. See above
4) Really? Has Thanos sword taken a small nuke energy blast like the one emitted from Doomsday? Because Wonder Womans Shield And Supermans skin has.
See how ridiculous this is getting?
1) What does heat have to do in here!? What are you even talking about!?
2)😂 The amount of lame assertions you can produce is astonishing. The fact that Mk 50 suit, which is actually an insanely strong suit scratched Thanos doesn't mean a punch from Superman is one-shotting him!
I know you tend to say stupidites when Thor is concerned. Have you turned a Superman fanboy now too?
Besides, what does Thanos' skin have to do in anything here? We are debating the fact that Superman won't endure a blow from Thanos' IS, not otherwise!
Stop strawmanning boy.
3) Prove Superman's skin>>> DD, or swallow your fallacies
4) Thanos was taking alien explosions in the back, repelling IM's blasters and enduring Thor's lightning.
😂
I'm going to use Thor against you. Are you saying that DD's radiation waves>>>> Thor's direct lightning strikes?
Let's use your fanboyism against you. Because if that's the case, then Thor has 0 chance of facing Superman, and OHH BOY that means we are going to have to reopen some threads.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
1) What does heat have to do in here!? What are you even talking about!?2)😂 The amount of lame assertions you can produce is astonishing. The fact that Mk 50 suit, which is actually an insanely strong suit [B]scratched
Thanos doesn't mean a punch from Superman is one-shotting him!I know you tend to say stupidites when Thor is concerned. Have you turned a Superman fanboy now too?
Besides, what does Thanos' skin have to do in anything here? We are debating the fact that Superman won't endure a blow from Thanos' IS, not otherwise!
Stop strawmanning boy.
3) Prove Superman's skin>>> DD, or swallow your fallacies
4) Thanos was taking alien explosions in the back, repelling IM's blasters and enduring Thor's lightning.
😂
I'm going to use Thor against you. Are you saying that DD's radiation waves>>>> Thor's direct lightning strikes?
Let's use your fanboyism against you. Because if that's the case, then Thor has 0 chance of facing Superman, and OHH BOY that means we are going to have to reopen some threads. [/B]
None of that is true, idiot
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
1) What does heat have to do in here!? What are you even talking about!?2)😂 The amount of lame assertions you can produce is astonishing. The fact that Mk 50 suit, which is actually an insanely strong suit [B]scratched
Thanos doesn't mean a punch from Superman is one-shotting him!I know you tend to say stupidites when Thor is concerned. Have you turned a Superman fanboy now too?
Besides, what does Thanos' skin have to do in anything here? We are debating the fact that Superman won't endure a blow from Thanos' IS, not otherwise!
Stop strawmanning boy.
3) Prove Superman's skin>>> DD, or swallow your fallacies
4) Thanos was taking alien explosions in the back, repelling IM's blasters and enduring Thor's lightning.
😂
I'm going to use Thor against you. Are you saying that DD's radiation waves>>>> Thor's direct lightning strikes?
Let's use your fanboyism against you. Because if that's the case, then Thor has 0 chance of facing Superman, and OHH BOY that means we are going to have to reopen some threads. [/B]
1) Point is you are comparing apples to oranges. You need to start making more relevant and cohesive arguments. But then If you did that, you wouldnt be claiming Thanos cutting Superman as a definitive statement.
2) I was actually showing you what an apples to oranges comparison looks like. But if you want to go there, of course Superman can scratch harder than Iron Mans foot. Heck IW Iron Man couldnt even take Cull.
Not a fanboy. Just being Objective. You should try it sometime.
3) Again moot point. When will you comprehend we are discussing Thanos sword cutting Superman, and not Doomsday vs Superman. You should take the Doomsday getting cut argument to the Doomsday vs Thanos thread.
4) Talking about Thanos Sword here, so no idea what taking Alien shots in the back is supposed to prove.
Hmm good question though, because Thanos sword took IMs repulsors amped by Thors Lightning. Point is though that WWs sword and shield have also been shown as unbreakable.
Moreover Wonder Womans sword wouldnt need the same feats, given it heats up upon cutting, making it a completely different attack. And for the millionth time equating Doomsday and Supermans durability is an Apples to Oranges comparison. As in its completely irrelevant.
Or perhaps im not a fanboy and just being Objective. You should try it sometime.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
1) Point is you are comparing apples to oranges. You need to start making more relevant and cohesive arguments. But then If you did that, you wouldnt be claiming Thanos cutting Superman as a definitive statement.2) I was actually showing you what an apples to oranges comparison looks like. But if you want to go there, of course Superman can scratch harder than Iron Mans foot. Heck IW Iron Man couldnt even take Cull.
Not a fanboy. Just being Objective. You should try it sometime.
3) Again moot point. When will you comprehend we are discussing Thanos sword cutting Superman, and not Doomsday vs Superman. You should take the Doomsday getting cut argument to the Doomsday vs Thanos thread.
4) Talking about Thanos Sword here, so no idea what taking Alien shots in the back is supposed to prove.
Hmm good question though, because Thanos sword took IMs repulsors amped by Thors Lightning. Point is though that WWs sword and shield have also been shown as unbreakable.
Moreover Wonder Womans sword wouldnt need the same feats, given it heats up upon cutting, making it a completely different attack. And for the millionth time equating Doomsday and Supermans durability is an Apples to Oranges comparison. As in its completely irrelevant.Or perhaps im not a fanboy and just being Objective. You should try it sometime.
1. WW's sword glowing doesn't automatically make it above Thanos' sword.
I'm not the one trying to prove that Superman's.skin is tougher than DD's. Burden of proof is on you.
2. Come on. You seriously underestimate the Mk50 suit. You forget that the much younger Mk6 suit was handling Thor!
On the other hand, what makes you so positive that a similar punch from the Mk50 suit won't make Superman bleed too?
3. So you concede WW's sword can cut Superman?
4. And where did you get that WW's sword heats when cutting? Is the thing some sort of lightsaber or what?
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
All I'm saying is that the fact that Marvel barely uses Slow Mo doesn't mean his characters are slower than DC's.Take WW for instance, we clearly see slow motion scenes of her blocking bullets, whereas we don't get slow motion scenes of guys like Thor, Hela, Captain America or other high skill fighters who constantly block, dodge and avoid way faster and more powerful attacks like beams of energy, etc.
So, I concede that Thanos is slower, but I won't concede that he will be rendered useless by Superman. If Superman lowers his guard, as he usually does, he will be defeated.
They are faster than a bullet, I can be certain of that.
Saying Thanos is faster than a bullet is based on pure fantasy. I'm not sure where you get the idea that the repulsor blasts(that we can clearly see on screen when fired) are faster than bullets.
Meanwhile Superman has a fight with another speedster at super speed while everyone around them is frozen. There will be no "he loses his guard" because there will be no need to guard. It will be over before Thanos realizes it. You're not grasping the speed difference here. Thanos will not have time to react. Especially when your best feat is that he barely reacted to a repulsor blast.
Superman could just take the sword and decapitate everyone with it. It'll be quick and painless.