Originally posted by Robtard
Biden was wrong for saying that, but he wasn't inciting or telling other to do violence. He was talking about himself.Obama is not talking about violence.
Waters is not talking about violence.
In Biden's defense, that's what you did back in the day. He's an old man. So is Trump. I know that doesn't justify what they said but I do think it would be close-minded to not understand that both Trump and Biden come from different generations.
It's also why I 99% support Buzz Aldrin punching that harassing dude right in the face when he ran up on Buzz yelling at him. That 1% of me holds out because I cannot support violence meeting non-violence - it's not the Jesus-Way.
Originally posted by TempAccount
Oh, I see. Stay at home dad? Wife is the bread-winner? No wonder he's a cuck.
They both work and they both do well for themselves. I joke that Robtard is rich but if we are to be honest, they actually are quite well off.
I do well for myself but I cannot afford to live where they live and raise kids. 😐
Get mad at him all you want, but he's successful enough to give back to the community and still have enough to play.
Originally posted by cdtm
Someone actually recorded one of the shootings. I sure wouldn't try and do that, even at a distance, that's a tremendous, stupid risk.
Dangerous. But if the shooter had any reason left, he may have wanted it to be recorded. And I think it is important that someone capture what happened. It could help greatly in the investigation. And we could see how this stuff plays out and better address first response and for bystanders to best know how to react to reduce loss of life.
Originally posted by Robtard
@broly and surtYou're trying to equalize something that isn't specifically inciting violence with something that explicitly is:
"Knock the crap out of him, would you? I promise you, I will pay your legal fees." -Trump
This is weasel behavior, you can't blame Trump's rhetoric and then say rhetoric about him being a nazi and destroying the country and all this vile shit said about him doesn't inspire things like..him being sent poison.
Originally posted by dadudemon
In Biden's defense, that's what you did back in the day. He's an old man. So is Trump. I know that doesn't justify what they said but I do think it would be close-minded to not understand that both Trump and Biden come from different generations.It's also why I 99% support Buzz Aldrin punching that harassing dude right in the face when he ran up on Buzz yelling at him. That 1% of me holds out because I cannot support violence meeting non-violence - it's not the Jesus-Way.
I never said I don't understand why Biden would say it. But it was wrong of him, considering of who he is; the position he's in.
Originally posted by Surtur
This is weasel behavior, you can't blame Trump's rhetoric and then say rhetoric about him being a nazi and destroying the country and all this vile shit said about him doesn't inspire things like..him being sent poison.
You dodging the point with something else is more akin to shit-weasel behavior. Anyhow, I'll answer in good faith despite this.
As far as Trump being sent poison, it very well could be that, it could also be Trump's hateful rhetoric stirring up some loon who hates him, we'd have to know more about the sender and his/her motives. eg like The MAGAbomber, we know he specifically targeted people and institutions Trump repeatedly labeled as "enemies", he had pictures and signs all over his crappy van indicating this, he's come out and said as much, that he became addicted to the hate at Trump's rallies and speeches.
Originally posted by Robtard
You dodging the point with something else is more akin to shit-weasel behavior. Anyhow, I'll answer in good faith despite this.As far as Trump being sent poison, it very well could be that, it could also be Trump's hateful rhetoric stirring up some loon who hates him, we'd have to know more about the sender and his/her motives. eg like The MAGAbomber, we know he specifically targeted people and institutions Trump repeatedly labeled as "enemies", he had pictures and signs all over his crappy van indicating this, he's come out and said as much, that he became addicted to the hate at Trump's rallies and speeches.
So we have reporters doing articles for major media companies saying anyone who still supports Trump is racist. That's not exactly nice rhetoric.
What if, god forbid, someone took offense to that and sent that person poison? Would you also say their own rhetoric possibly played a role?
*citations needed*
You're also equalization what appears to be rando opinion writer with the POTUS. Trump's words carry far more weigh given his position.
eg Remember when all you people who would become Trumpers freaked out when Obama said "he could have been my son", that was benign and you took it as inciting a race war.
You don't get to keep doing that, brushing anything anyone else does off because Trump is the president. We can't be told the media is super important and then ignore when they spew this shit. Here is an example from the daily beast:
https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-is-a-racist-if-you-still-support-him-so-are-you
And before you even go there, here is the authors twitter page:
https://twitter.com/goldietaylor
Nearly 150k followers. Not in the millions like some others have, but it's pretty large compared to most twitter users.
Side note, some dems are fundraising off these shootings. Classy.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democratic-party-fundraises-off-mass-shootings
Originally posted by Surtur
You don't get to keep doing that, brushing anything anyone else does off because Trump is the president. We can't be told the media is super important and then ignore when they spew this shit. Here is an example from the daily beast:https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-is-a-racist-if-you-still-support-him-so-are-you
And before you even go there, here is the authors twitter page:
https://twitter.com/goldietaylor
Nearly 150k followers. Not in the millions like some others have, but it's pretty large compared to most twitter users.
That's an opinion piece from a writer and she's absolutely correct with her "Trump is a racist" comment. IMO, her comment about Trumpers was a bit to broad stroked.
You're still trying to equalize the weight her words carry with the weight of the POTUS', which is as always a silly tactic.
Anyhow, America has a White Supremacy problem, which is leading to domestic terrorism more and more, there's no denying that, this thread is about that.
Originally posted by Robtard
No, it doesn't, agreed there. But when it's a 0.01% in comparison, trying to equalize is silly (as noted).Anyhow, America really needs to start treating White Supremacist in the same level as we do Islamic extremist. They're showing they're not going to stop.
Well no we need to do better cuz there was a period of time people in power wouldn't even call radical islamic terrorism...radical islamic terrorism.
They have no issue naming white supremacist terrorism though. So good I guess, coincidentally they learned the lesson when it came to the evil whites.
Originally posted by Surtur
Well no we need to do better cuz there was a period of time people in power wouldn't even call radical islamic terrorism...radical islamic terrorism.They have no issue naming white supremacist terrorism though. So good I guess, coincidentally they learned the lesson when it came to the evil whites.
👆
Originally posted by Surtur
Well no we need to do better cuz there was a period of time people in power wouldn't even call radical islamic terrorism...radical islamic terrorism.They have no issue naming white supremacist terrorism though. So good I guess, coincidentally they learned the lesson when it came to the evil whites.
You're focusing on labels while ignoring the Obama admin's record on targeting Islamic Extremism. eg his admin is the one that finally took out Osama.
But if you don't want to call these White Supremacist "terrorist", then don't; I don't care.