Mitch McConnell is Sitting on 2 Gun Regulation Bills that Have Bi-Partisan Support

Originally posted by Robtard
There's nothing wrong with waiting 30d ays for a gun in the general sense.

It could potentially stop that rare would-be mass murderer from doing their thing as they could come to their senses between those 30 days.

That might be true in some cases, some instances. In other instances, it will just push illegally obtained firearms into more easily obtainable illegal manners. More surreptitiously obtained arms.

Prohibitions don't work. They only work for criminals to monetize crime. \

And, still, others with mental health issues will stew and become worse. Having more time to devise and think of better ways to kill people is not a good idea.

Also, and lastly, most of these shooters use guns that don't belong to them or are guns obtained illegally. Meaning, more regulations will not stop this fewer than 1% of our annual homicides.

Originally posted by Surtur
I'm in his head, remember when he followed me around for weeks begging me to talk to him? Good times.

If You go in there...put on a Hazmat suit.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Fbi>you. Exposed.

Good thing Quanchi tucks. TUCKS HARD!

Originally posted by Surtur
*shrug* So someone whose life is potentially in danger might have to wait 30 days. If you're cool with that okay.

Yes, I am 100% okay with someone who feels their life is currently in danger having to wait 20 days to obtain a firearm.

Because they should report that to the police or use less-lethal options until then.

The Police Can't Protect Everyone. Not Everyone can afford to Live in Gated Communities with Armed Security.

You are an Elitist Hypocrite Dadu.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]If You go in there...put on a Hazmat suit.

Good thing Quanchi tucks. TUCKS HARD! [/B]

*Kettle Pot Black Gif Here*

Originally posted by dadudemon
Yes, I am 100% okay with someone who feels their life is currently in danger having to wait 20 days to obtain a firearm.

Because they should report that to the police or use less-lethal options until then.

The CPD is corrupt as f*ck. The politicians in this city legit got mad at a dude who wore a wire to expose corrupt alderman. That bothered them more than the corruption itself.

Maybe where you live the police would come through better, but it's not everybody's reality man.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]*Kettle Pot Black Gif Here* [/B]

Originally posted by Surtur
The CPD is corrupt as f*ck. The politicians in this city legit got mad at a dude who wore a wire to expose corrupt alderman. That bothered them more than the corruption itself.

Maybe where you live the police would come through better, but it's not everybody's reality man.

If Only Quan would take his Own Advice.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]If Only Quan would take his Own Advice. [/B]

Originally posted by dadudemon
Yes, I am 100% okay with someone who feels their life is currently in danger having to wait 20 days to obtain a firearm.

Because they should report that to the police or use less-lethal options until then.

I absolutely don't have a problem with the bills and 30 days supposed to be the outside range of waiting. That said there are a lot of rural areas where getting police protection isn't really an option.

My family has land way up and out in Montana and I can promise you without a gun to protect yourself someone could kill/eat you bury/poop you (out) and no one would even know until the mail was overflowing.

It shows how large the US is in regards to how urban areas function vs rural and why not all policies work for all states effectively.

What if someone can prove they are in actual danger? Should there be a way to fast track it? Come on guys. I'm imagining someone living in one of the worst neighborhoods in Chicago being in danger and having to wait 30 days.

When I say danger I don't mean just living in a bad area. Little kids have been murdered by drug dealers over stuff their parents did. They will target families.

@surt

You're obviously using yourself as the example here. You've survived your whole life in your shithole part of Chicago without a gun, do you actually think waiting for a gun 30days from even today will mean life or death?

Originally posted by Robtard
@surt

You're obviously using yourself as the example here. You've survived your whole life in your shithole part of Chicago without a gun, do you actually think waiting for a gun 30days from even today will mean life or death?

I'm legitimately curious if he genuinely feels his life is in that much danger any given day and that owning a gun right now would make a difference.

Originally posted by Robtard
I'm legitimately curious if he genuinely feels his life is in that much danger any given day and that owning a gun right now would make a difference.

How many mass shootings do you think would be stopped by adding a 20 day waiting period?

Originally posted by Silent Master
How many mass shootings do you think would be stopped by adding a 20 day waiting period?

Potentially, more than half.

But that's just a distraction. The real issue of the bill is the universal background checks.