Thanos and Black Order vs. DC Trinity

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Tbf Hulk was about the size of Surturs eyebrow.

IMs punches had nowhere near the effect that Hulks did.

Josh you were comparing IM with Superman and have suddenly switched to comparing Hulk with Superman.

IM couldnt even take Cull Obsidian. So no, its not the same thing.

Yes, I am, since both fought Thanos and were having similar results.

Ergo, that means that the MK50 suit can pack a punch as strong as Hulk's or nearly as strong.

I honestly don't get it why you guys underestimate the MK50 suit so much.

The MK3 suit was destroying tanks for fun.

The Hulkbuster armor was going toe to toe with Hulk!

If the MK50 suit was inferior to this older models, then why on hell would Tony, the smartest brain in the MCU, pick a weaker model?

Ohh, how much I love fallacies.

Since when does punching strenght/force has to do with laser combat? Because in no moment did Tony punch or even attempted to punch Cull Obsedian.

Originally posted by WolvesofBabylon
Well apparently to Josh Ironman hit Cull Obsidian with the same amount of power that Hulk hit the Leviathan with. So either Cull is a beast or Josh is clueless and cant admit to saying something ridiculous.

Or, you haven't watched Infinity War and are here for your mere apreciation to Superman.

Watch the movie, you'll realize that Tony never punched Cull and was for some reason resorting to only his blasters.

PIS? Parhaps.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Going by his logic Cull is more durable than Thanos. Is that what you're saying, Josh?

What does durability has to do with punching strength? Go ahead and enlight us.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander

The Hulkbuster armor was going toe to toe with Hulk!

If the MK50 suit was inferior to this older models, then why on hell would Tony, the smartest brain in the MCU, pick a weaker model?

[/B]

Urm because the MK50 is more compact and more versatile.

But to reverse your logic What would be the point in keeping Hulkbuster armour around if the MK50 was stronger?

You cant scale his armours like that because each one is different. In IM3 his armour is knocked to pieces by a car. Or was it a bus or train? Cant remember and really dont want to rewatch that film.

Anyway kindly post he scenes with timestamps where you believe Iron Mans punches had the exact same effect as Hulks. Because none of us recall that.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Urm because the MK50 is more compact and more versatile.

But to reverse your logic What would be the point in keeping Hulkbuster armour around if the MK50 was stronger?

You cant scale his armours like that because each one is different. In IM3 his armour is knocked to pieces by a car. Or was it a bus or train? Cant remember and really dont want to rewatch that film.

Anyway kindly post he scenes with timestamps where you believe Iron Mans punches had the exact same effect as Hulks. Because none of us recall that.

When you are right, you are right👆

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Everyone is laughing at the fact that you can't understand a metaphor.

You have the IQ of an ape 😂

Everyone here is laughing at you, not a single person agrees with you on this thread. You are a flipping retard.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Or, you haven't watched Infinity War and are here for your mere apreciation to Superman.

Watch the movie, you'll realize that Tony never punched Cull and was for some reason resorting to only his blasters.

PIS? Parhaps.

What does durability has to do with punching strength? Go ahead and enlight us.

When they first meet Cull charges and goes to hit Tony with his hammer and Tony blocks it with his shield and then Tony uppercuts Cull with little to no effect then hits him with his blasters.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Urm because the MK50 is more compact and more versatile.

But to reverse your logic What would be the point in keeping Hulkbuster armour around if the MK50 was stronger?

You cant scale his armours like that because each one is different. In IM3 his armour is knocked to pieces by a car. Or was it a bus or train? Cant remember and really dont want to rewatch that film.

Anyway kindly post he scenes with timestamps where you believe Iron Mans punches had the exact same effect as Hulks. Because none of us recall that.

Because he felt like? Because he keeps all his models arround as seen in IM3.

The MK42 from IM3 was a prototype. The MK50 isn't a prototype.

The fact that IM's punches made Thanos bleed means they were having a better effect than Hulk's.

Besides, I don't believe the Thanos' cut was due to a blunt impact, but maybe because Tony hit him with an edge of the suit.

Pressure under a small area》》》 bigger force.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Because he felt like? Because he keeps all his models arround as seen in IM3.

The MK42 from IM3 was a prototype. The MK50 isn't a prototype.

The fact that IM's punches made Thanos bleed means they were having a better effect than Hulk's.

Besides, I don't believe the Thanos' cut was due to a blunt impact, but maybe because Tony hit him with an edge of the suit.

Pressure under a small area》》》 bigger force.

I bet you don’t even know what you’re talking about, chicken brain.

You’re wrong in this topic.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Everyone here is laughing at you, not a single person agrees with you on this thread. You are a flipping retard.

You've presented 0 evidence for your argument, you're losing.

Originally posted by WolvesofBabylon
When they first meet Cull charges and goes to hit Tony with his hammer and Tony blocks it with his shield and then Tony uppercuts Cull with little to no effect then hits him with his blasters.

YouTube video

please time stamp it.

Originally posted by Eon Blue
I bet you don’t even know what you’re talking about, chicken brain.

You’re wrong in this topic.

Shut up, ignorant suck.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Everyone is laughing at the fact that you can't understand a metaphor.

You have the IQ of an ape 😂

Says the guy who couldn't understand what "$20 says " means😂

You are an utter buffoon!!!!😂😂

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
YouTube video

please time stamp it.

YouTube video

This video shows it?

Originally posted by WolvesofBabylon
YouTube video

This video shows it?

Well, that was weird, the other video didn't had that scene.

Okay, I think it's pretty obvious, either way, please spot the diference between Iron Man's direct punch to Thanos and Iron Man's upper cut to Cull.

Here is the video. Minute 0:43.

osSJhXruEzU&t=47s

^clownshoes issues pitiful retort.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Well, that was weird, the other video didn't had that scene.

Okay, I think it's pretty obvious, either way, please spot the diference between Iron Man's direct punch to Thanos and Iron Man's upper cut to Cull.

Here is the video. Minute 0:43.

osSJhXruEzU&t=47s

Well the punch vs Cull was a strsight up Punch and the one with Thanos was an aided punch.

If I go with your logic though you admit that fighters dont throw there hardest punch every time so its possible Hulk didnt throw his hardest punches vs Thanos?

And again watch Supermans fights his punches create shockwaves and send people flying. Ironman has shown Zero feats of that level. OMG he knocked Thanos head sideways. Captain America did the same thing

Originally posted by WolvesofBabylon
Well the punch vs Cull was a strsight up Punch and the one with Thanos was an aided punch.

If I go with your logic though you admit that fighters dont throw there hardest punch every time so its possible Hulk didnt throw his hardest punches vs Thanos?

And again watch Supermans fights his punches create shockwaves and send people flying. Ironman has shown Zero feats of that level. OMG he knocked Thanos head sideways. Captain America did the same thing

Exactly, they are different attacks. Clearly Tony was going all out and used some sort of propulsor to increase the force of impact.

Clearly, you can't say that Cull was impacted with the same strength.

Except Cap didn't even manage to piss Thanos... Iron Man clearly butthurted the Titan.

^pitiful arguement filled with lies

Josh needs to give up already and eat more of his Momma’s food.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Because he felt like? Because he keeps all his models arround as seen in IM3.

The MK42 from IM3 was a prototype. The MK50 isn't a prototype.

The fact that IM's punches made Thanos bleed means they were having a better effect than Hulk's.

Besides, I don't believe the Thanos' cut was due to a blunt impact, but maybe because Tony hit him with an edge of the suit.

Pressure under a small area》》》 bigger force.

He was using the prototype. Hence by your logic all his previous armours were physically weaker. So dont start making excuses, the second your own logic you expect us all to accept as fact, doesnt work in your favour.

So tell me Josh why wasnt IM in the Hulkbuster armour for the entirety of AOU? Clearly it was far too big and impractical for regular use. But clearly far far stronger than the armour he uses 99% of the time.

Btw You still havent posted the Hulk vs Thanos and IM vs Thanos videos and time stamped where they displayed the same striking power. Given no one else sees that, the least you could do is visually back up your claim.