Black Panther: Wakanda Forever

Started by 0mega Spawn15 pages
Originally posted by 0mega Spawn
. His plans were to use said sleepers to empower those disenfranchised. I don’t see how anyone could consider that villainous. What he wanted was understandable. How he went about doing so wasn’t.
Originally posted by 0mega Spawn
. What in the **** are you talking about

It's not difficult to grasp.

You claimed that the Thanos situation is different because the items he had at his disposal could have allowed him to save everyone by creating infinite resources but he is a villain because he chose instead to kill half the universe so they don't destroy themselves by overpopulation and using up the existing resources.

Killmonger could have used the Wakanda tech he acquired to "empower the disenfranchised" without killing people around the world. He chose to kill people to do it.

Thus he made the exact same moral choice as Thanos. Who you agree is a villain.

Originally posted by 0mega Spawn

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
It's not difficult to grasp.

You claimed that the Thanos situation is different because the items he had at his disposal could have allowed him to save everyone by creating infinite resources but he is a villain because he chose instead to kill half the universe so they don't destroy themselves by overpopulation and using up the existing resources.

Killmonger could have used the Wakanda tech he acquired to "empower the disenfranchised" without killing people around the world. He chose to kill people to do it.

Thus he made the exact same moral choice as Thanos. Who you agree is a villain.

You must not live on earth. The powers that be are not simply going to allow that. Whereas thanos using magical stones, nothing anyone could do about it.

Now you're relying on conjecture and stuff that didn't even happen to support your argument.

They both made the same moral choice. Accept it.

Killmonger is absolutely a villain. You can't say any different. He had revolutionary ideals that could have changed the world, but he also wanted to punish that world and a loooooot of innocents. He. Was. A. Villain.

Omega Spawn, not to be blunt, but.......

Do you support BLM, The Hebrew Israelites, or the NOI?

Killmonger was definitely a villain. Just because he was a sympathetic villain doesn’t make him any less of a villain.

Originally posted by BackFire
Killmonger was definitely a villain. Just because he was a sympathetic villain doesn’t make him any less of a villain.

spot on

Originally posted by BackFire
Killmonger was definitely a villain. Just because he was a sympathetic villain doesn’t make him any less of a villain.
. Then many historical figures willing to kill for equality and freedom are “villains” ,no?

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Now you're relying on conjecture and stuff that didn't even happen to support your argument.

They both made the same moral choice. Accept it.

. Stuff that didn’t happen? Lol. You just compared thanos having literal omnipotence to killmonger willingness to empower people with weapons and tech. BP decided to open his borders and buying some buildings will not come to fruition the way you think it would for the simple fact that song and dance has in fact happen before

Uwotm8?

Will KMC accept a recast of T'Challa

Nobody should. It's not only disrespectful to his legacy, it just doesn't make sense when a canon replacement in Shuri has been there for years already.

Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
Will [b]KMC accept a recast of T'Challa [/B]

Dying offscreen sucks. Maybe if he stayed dead after Infinity War.

Being recast sucks, too.

...

No good ideas for this one. Shuri is not good enough to replace her brother in MCU.

They recast Banner, Rhodey, Howard Stark, Thanos, Red Skull and Fandral.

They can recast BP

All of those were for creative differences, money disputes or scheduling conflicts. Not because someone died.

And none of them had a literal stand in already available.

I think giving Shuri the reigns for BP2 and seeing how it goes is the best option for them. If it goes well and the movie/character does well then that’ll be that. If not they can always recast T’Challa for BP3 and will have bought themselves a lot of time. By then people will probably be less sensitive to the idea as BP3 probably won’t be out for like 7 years.

Taking this film always has many big butt because I have always heard about this film.

Originally posted by KingD19
All of those were for creative differences, money disputes or scheduling conflicts. Not because someone died.

So?!