NRA Sues San Francisco After Lawmakers Declare It A Terrorist Organization

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Who's "we"?

You and your imaginary friends?

You're losing the plot.

Allow me to play doubles advocate here for a moment. For all intensive purposes I think you are wrong. In an age where false morals are a diamond dozen, true virtues are a blessing in the skies. We often put our false morality on a petal stool like a bunch of pre-Madonnas, but you all seem to be taking something very valuable for granite. So I ask of you to mustard up all the strength you can because it is a doggy dog world out there. Although there is some merit to what you are saying it seems like you have a huge ship on your shoulder. In your argument you seem to throw everything in but the kids Nsync, and even though you are having a feel day with this I am here to bring you back into reality. I have a sick sense when it comes to these types of things. It is almost spooky, because I cannot turn a blonde eye to these glaring flaws in your rhetoric. I have zero taller ants when it comes to people spouting out hate in the name of moral righteousness. You just need to remember what comes around is all around, and when supply and command fails you will be the first to go.

Make my words, when you get down to brass stacks it doesn't take rocket appliances to get two birds stoned at once. It's clear who makes the pants in this relationship, and sometimes you just have to swallow your prize and accept the facts. You might have to come to this conclusion through denial and error but I swear on my mother's mating name that when you put the petal to the medal you will pass with flying carpets like it’s a peach of cake.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Don't be so damn dense. I think everyone understands when he says 'we' he's either referring to all the people who're reading you two's back and forth replies with each other or he's referring to himself and you as the 'we'. You insulting him by accusing him of having "imaginary friends" isn't helping your argument at all. But, like a typical leftist, you resort to insults when you're losing the argument as lefties always do.

Here comes the other fruitloop gibbering utter pish. Birds of a feather and all that.

I love the sock army support from Fly coming in. He is now trying a second account in the GDF beyond his lone ranger one. Funny stuff.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Allow me to play doubles advocate here for a moment. For all intensive purposes I think you are wrong. In an age where false morals are a diamond dozen, true virtues are a blessing in the skies. We often put our false morality on a petal stool like a bunch of pre-Madonnas, but you all seem to be taking something very valuable for granite. So I ask of you to mustard up all the strength you can because it is a doggy dog world out there. Although there is some merit to what you are saying it seems like you have a huge ship on your shoulder. In your argument you seem to throw everything in but the kids Nsync, and even though you are having a feel day with this I am here to bring you back into reality. I have a sick sense when it comes to these types of things. It is almost spooky, because I cannot turn a blonde eye to these glaring flaws in your rhetoric. I have zero taller ants when it comes to people spouting out hate in the name of moral righteousness. You just need to remember what comes around is all around, and when supply and command fails you will be the first to go.

Make my words, when you get down to brass stacks it doesn't take rocket appliances to get two birds stoned at once. It's clear who makes the pants in this relationship, and sometimes you just have to swallow your prize and accept the facts. You might have to come to this conclusion through denial and error but I swear on my mother's mating name that when you put the petal to the medal you will pass with flying carpets like it’s a peach of cake.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Allow me to play doubles advocate here for a moment. For all intensive purposes I think you are wrong. In an age where false morals are a diamond dozen, true virtues are a blessing in the skies. We often put our false morality on a petal stool like a bunch of pre-Madonnas, but you all seem to be taking something very valuable for granite. So I ask of you to mustard up all the strength you can because it is a doggy dog world out there. Although there is some merit to what you are saying it seems like you have a huge ship on your shoulder. In your argument you seem to throw everything in but the kids Nsync, and even though you are having a feel day with this I am here to bring you back into reality. I have a sick sense when it comes to these types of things. It is almost spooky, because I cannot turn a blonde eye to these glaring flaws in your rhetoric. I have zero taller ants when it comes to people spouting out hate in the name of moral righteousness. You just need to remember what comes around is all around, and when supply and command fails you will be the first to go.

Make my words, when you get down to brass stacks it doesn't take rocket appliances to get two birds stoned at once. It's clear who makes the pants in this relationship, and sometimes you just have to swallow your prize and accept the facts. You might have to come to this conclusion through denial and error but I swear on my mother's mating name that when you put the petal to the medal you will pass with flying carpets like it’s a peach of cake.

Originally posted by NemeBro
SquallX is really coming apart at the seams here.

When women are being used as a political tool, then thrown out after their no longer of used, only to return and do the same thing once election rear his head, then come back and talk to me.

Till then, **** off.

So not a single instance of terrorism done in the name of the NRA...I figure if anyone here had an example they would have mentioned it by now so yeah I'm calling bullshit.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
I am just repeating verbatim what Trump said to four women of color who are also public servants. You did not consider it racist when he said it, so why is it racist now?

Funny how that works.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Here's the cities scored in that report.

The demographics of some of those cities

Lowest scoring
Richmond Virginia. 50.3% black
Phoenix Arizona. 6.9% black
Oklahoma city. 15% black
Nashville Tennessee. 27%
Louisville KY. 23%
Las Vegas NV. 11%
Hartford CT 38%

Highest scoring
New York city 25%
San Francisco 5%
Chicago 32%
Philadelphia 42%
Seattle 7%
Washington 47%
Austin TX 8%
Boston 25%

Doesn't really seem to be much correlation between skin colour and abortion provision.

I wonder if there's more to it

Well, there goes that silly theory they were pushing. Not that it really had legs to begin with. Thanks for the info.

Originally posted by Robtard
Funny how that works.

So was Adam being racist by telling him to go back to Haiti or not?

Originally posted by Surtur
So was Adam telling him to go back to Haiti racist or not?

Do you not understand what "repeating verbatim" means. Adam copied Trump's words.

Now why do you think they're racist now?

Actually here is what Trump said:

"Why don’t they go back and help fix the totally broken and crime infested places from which they came. Then come back and show us how...."

When San Francisco sinks into the ocean the NRA is going to regret the legal bills.

Originally posted by Surtur
Actually here is what Trump said:

[b]"Why don’t they go back and help fix the totally broken and crime infested places from which they came. Then come back and show us how...." [/B]

And:

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
If you do not like it, then why do you not go back to Haiti, and help fix the totally broken and crime-infested place from which your parents came?

So why is it racist when Adam uses the "Go back.." sentiment, mimicking Trump for a point, but it's not racist when Trump and his cult do?

Originally posted by Robtard
And:

So why is it racist when Adam uses the "Go back.." sentiment, mimicking Trump for a point, but it's not racist when Trump and his cult do?

I never said it was racist I asked you if you think what Adam said was racist. The reason is I'm pretty sure you said it was racist when Trump did it, but I could be wrong.

God answered this. He said be 'sons of the light.'

For the record I don't think what Adam said is racist and yes it is inconsistent for those who said Trump doing it isn't racist to say Adam doing it is racist.

However, that goes both ways. It's also inconsistent for anyone who believes Trump was racist for doing it to not think what Adam did is racist. And "I said something racist to own the cons" would not negate the racism.

Since what day are so many people in the world not raciest?

Originally posted by Surtur
For the record I don't think what Adam said is racist and yes it is inconsistent for those who said Trump doing it isn't racist to say Adam doing it is racist.

However, that goes both ways. It's also inconsistent for anyone who believes Trump was racist for doing it to not think what Adam did is racist. And "I said something racist to own the cons" would not negate the racism.

It is not inconsistent to hold SquallX to his own standard.

Originally posted by Surtur
For the record I don't think what Adam said is racist and yes it is inconsistent for those who said Trump doing it isn't racist to say Adam doing it is racist.

However, that goes both ways. It's also inconsistent for anyone who believes Trump was racist for doing it to not think what Adam did is racist. And "I said something racist to own the cons" would not negate the racism.

Adam wasn't saying it because he felt that way. He repeated Trump's words to see something, it was blatantly obvious to most.