NRA Sues San Francisco After Lawmakers Declare It A Terrorist Organization

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
A quarter of abortion clinics have closed in the US due to state and local anti-abortion legislation since 2010

TRAP laws (targeted regulation of abortion providers) have been used locally for decades to close down or prevent the opening of abortion clinics by implementing overly burdensome regulations.

Some states implemented that abortions could only be provided at ambulatory surgical centers. Then when Planned Parenthood tried to move into those centers the states changed their zoning laws again specifically to prevent them from doing so

If their locations were purely about targeting black people and not about conservative/republican vs progressive/democrat then why does Memphis rate so low on the reproductive freedoms index despite being 63% black yet Los Angeles rates at the top despite being only 10% black?

The "protecting black life" organization feels like they've already addressed your point because they've used a specific control to determine where these surgical facilities get placed:

Where black and/or Latino minorities make the majority of the population or represent 1.5x higher than the white population. In LA, the areas where these surgical facilities are located quite easily meet the criteria set by the "protecting black life" using census and address data.

However, you do bring up another point: Atlanta George is well known to be a very black city: ~52% black. Yet not a single PP surgical facility is located there. In the entire state.

https://www.plannedparenthood.org/health-center/georgia/atlanta/30316/east-atlanta-health-center-4286-90330/abortion

What you bring up is correct however, it is possible for both of us to be right without either of us taking away from what the other pointed out.

Conservatives likely have blocked surgical abortion centers from being setup in Georgia. However, if they were allowed, they would definitely target black people and Latinos.

It's 79% targeted towards black people and Latinos. Almost 80%. That means 8 out of 10 PP surgical centers are in areas that are mostly black, Latino, or both.

How is that not systematic targeting of black people and Latinos? By the raw numbers, there are more "white majority" cities with more poor white people than either black or Latino. There are more poor white metropolitan areas than there are black and by quite a comfortable number.

Side-note: white and Latino Socio-economic mobility continues to far-outpace black SEM. When controlling for factors such as employment consistency, education, criminal history, and marriage, SEM parity is nearly reached. The best take away advice, if you are a young black man or young black woman, is:

1. Stay away from crime.
2. Stay away from drugs.
3. Maintain consistent employment history (do not job hop)
4. Do not have babies until you get married.
5. Get married.
6. Finish high school and acquire post-secondary education by any means possible.

If you do this, there is almost no difference compared to your white peers when comparing the same variables.

Also, because of the opportunities that exist for black people that do not exist for white people, I am willing to bet that if all those items are checked off, a black person will see better SEM than a white person, on average.

How do we know all of this? Second generation Asians. 😐 The children of Asian immigrants are better in almost every single category compared to any other race demographic. Health, education, income, etc.

Originally posted by SquallX
One thing you’ll witness about far left liberals, they talk all these shits, but they don’t follow through.

They talk of racism on the other side, but magically forgets about their own racism.

They talk about climate change, yet they still drive cars, still turn on their ac’s, heaters, still fly in planes.

The far left liberals are the worse of the worse. Nothing but hypocrites.

I agree.

I say it a lot: conservatives are in your face with their climate change denial or at least denying the weight of human involvement in climate change.

They are in your face with their xenophobic racism (but it is not necessarily racism as many are more than happy to bring highly educated, skilled workers, non-criminals into the US through the legal immigration process - race has nothing to do with it for many of them).

They are in your face about their mostly archaic sexism about gender roles.

They are usually overt. You know what you're getting. It's there in the open.

Contrasted with leftists and progressives where everything is subversive, hidden, and covertly evil. It's far worse and sinister. If I sit down with a conservative and talk politics, I can reason with them. Conservative libertarians, Muslims, Christians: almost always, they can be reasoned with. Not so for my fellow liberals. I cannot reason with them if you get them going.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
No proof of that giant black genocide conspiracy other than a white woman born in the 1800s had shitty opinions about black people.

👍

Well, except for the absurdly racist reality about abortion, who is targeted about 80% of the time with abortions (including marketing campaigns), etc.

Since 2014, more black babies were aborted than were born in NYC and that gap keeps widening. Hooray for racist progressives and Democrats who are doing very well to keep their black voters under control, poor, and voting for them.

"Why would they want to control the population if they want their votes?" Districts. They will not change for many decades. They are guaranteed votes. They don't want the population spilling over into their gentrified neighborhoods, though. It's a passive genocide.

Every chance I get, I tell young black people to get an education, be consistent and reliable with work, and stay away from crime. AND...get married and make tons of babies after settling into their career. Tons. It's the same advice I give white people, as well.

I should get on having tons of kids...

Originally posted by dadudemon
I agree.

I say it a lot: conservatives are in your face with their climate change denial or at least denying the weight of human involvement in climate change.

They are in your face with their xenophobic racism (but it is not necessarily racism as many are more than happy to bring highly educated, skilled workers, non-criminals into the US through the legal immigration process - race has nothing to do with it for many of them).

They are in your face about their mostly archaic sexism about gender roles.

They are usually overt. You know what you're getting. It's there in the open.

Contrasted with leftists and progressives where everything is subversive, hidden, and covertly evil. It's far worse and sinister. If I sit down with a conservative and talk politics, I can reason with them. Conservative libertarians, Muslims, Christians: almost always, they can be reasoned with. Not so for my fellow liberals. I cannot reason with them if you get them going.

1. That's because the so-called "evidence" for man-made climate is almost non-existent; or at least the effect that man has on actual climate change is very insignificant. It is not "denial" lol. This reminds me of how some atheists and even some so-called "Christians" (usually catholics and their false prophet pope) say creationists "deny" evolution. Denying it would mean there is overwhelming evidence to support it yet there is literally NONE. You don't deny something that hasn't been proven, you choose not to believe in it. Yeah, I'm sure you and others will now say there is overwhelming scientific evidence for both but there truly isn't, especially darwinian evolution bs. Only microevolution is a proven fact and that really isn't evolution. People can deny gravity (which would be very dangerous to do) but no one denies evolutionism. Many people to choose to not believe in it though (yes, I am one of them).

2.LOL Conservatives as a whole are not "xenophobic racists." I thought you were above making typical left-wing arguments like that. Guess I was wrong. Wanting strong borders and people to come here legally is not being racist.

3. There is nothing "archaic" about traditional gender roles. Absolutely nothing. It is only you and other leftists' opinions that they are outdated.

4. Modern day so-called "liberals" are not really liberals, at least not in the classical sense. They are radical leftist so-called "progressive" (they're actually regressives, imo) pieces of shit. I thought you claimed you were a centrist. 😕

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
1. That's because the so-called "evidence" for man-made climate is almost non-existent; or at least the effect that man has on actual climate change is very insignificant. It is not "denial" lol. This reminds me of how some atheists and even some so-called "Christians" (usually catholics and their false prophet pope) say creationists "deny" evolution. Denying it would mean there is overwhelming evidence to support it yet there is literally NONE. You don't deny something that hasn't been proven, you choose not to believe in it. Yeah, I'm sure you and others will now say there is overwhelming scientific evidence for both but there truly isn't, especially darwinian evolution bs. Only microevolution is a proven fact and that really isn't evolution. People can deny gravity (which would be very dangerous to do) but no one denies evolutionism. Many people to choose to not believe in it though (yes, I am one of them).

👆

Evolution is a major-religion.

And like any major-religion, it will never be ridden of, and it's followers will insist it's true - even if you argue logic and facts with them.

Evolution is basically Scientology's prettier and more popular cousin.

Both are science-fiction-based religions.

And Charles Darwin is basically a charlatan and the supreme prophet of that religion.

(Praise be upon him)

Originally posted by dadudemon
I agree.

I say it a lot: conservatives are in your face with their climate change denial or at least denying the weight of human involvement in climate change.

They are in your face with their xenophobic racism (but it is not necessarily racism as many are more than happy to bring highly educated, skilled workers, non-criminals into the US through the legal immigration process - race has nothing to do with it for many of them).

They are in your face about their mostly archaic sexism about gender roles.

They are usually overt. You know what you're getting. It's there in the open.

Contrasted with leftists and progressives where everything is subversive, hidden, and covertly evil. It's far worse and sinister. If I sit down with a conservative and talk politics, I can reason with them. Conservative libertarians, Muslims, Christians: almost always, they can be reasoned with. Not so for my fellow liberals. I cannot reason with them if you get them going.

I would like to address some of your points

1. I can’t speak on climate change because I don’t know much about it. I’ve read a few papers here and there, but I’ll admit, in the end, I don’t care for it much.

2. Being Xenophonic is not always a bad thing, especially in this climate. Every whites should in a way feel scared because everything they do, someone is out there screaming in their face calling them all type of names. From being nazi’s racist, homophobes. It’s projected in the near future, Whites will no longer be the majority in this country.

3. Gender roles is not always a bad thing. It’s only now with third waves feminisms that gender roles are seen as bad. Worse yet, when a woman chooses to be a stay home mom, other feminist calls them traitors to the female group. Denying them their right to choose.

2 and 3 where the ones I wanted to talk about, with 1 being me not knowing and not caring enough.

Originally posted by CaveDude33211
👆

Evolution is a major-religion.

And like any major-religion, it will never be ridden of, and it's followers will insist it's true - even if you argue logic and facts with them.

Evolution is basically Scientology's prettier and more popular cousin.

Both are science-fiction-based religions.

And Charles Darwin is basically a charlatan and the supreme prophet of that religion.

(Praise be upon him)

Yes, it is basically a state-funded highly protected religion. It's not part of real science. I have no problem with people believing in it but we shouldn't all have to pay for it with our taxes. If people want to teach it then they should start their own private school and teach it there.

Originally posted by SquallX
Nice one you moronic ****. I love the fact that your only answer is to go back to Haiti. Truly the words of a white liberal racist.

My parents came to this Country to give my little sister and myself a better life. A life I am proud off. A life I have done the best to help the families I have back in Haiti. I am not so dense that I believe I can make a difference in Haiti with all the bad shits that takes place, but I help my family.

I love the fact you omit one of the reasons Haiti’s so **** up was because of the Clinton’s shady deals.

I chose to become a citizen of this country, I have bled for this country, I have lost brothers defending this country, far more than your racist ass can claim.

In the end, this immigrant have done far more for this country than your racist ass will ever accomplish.

I am just repeating verbatim what Trump said to four women of color who are also public servants. You did not consider it racist when he said it, so why is it racist now?

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Here's the cities scored in that report.

The demographics of some of those cities

Lowest scoring
Richmond Virginia. 50.3% black
Phoenix Arizona. 6.9% black
Oklahoma city. 15% black
Nashville Tennessee. 27%
Louisville KY. 23%
Las Vegas NV. 11%
Hartford CT 38%

Highest scoring
New York city 25%
San Francisco 5%
Chicago 32%
Philadelphia 42%
Seattle 7%
Washington 47%
Austin TX 8%
Boston 25%

Doesn't really seem to be much correlation between skin colour and abortion provision.

I wonder if there's more to it

Damn, roasted.

Who did he roast?

His mama? 😂 🤣 😂 😆 😆

Originally posted by SquallX
I would like to address some of your points

1. I can’t speak on climate change because I don’t know much about it. I’ve read a few papers here and there, but I’ll admit, in the end, I don’t care for it much.

2. Being Xenophonic is not always a bad thing, especially in this climate. Every whites should in a way feel scared because everything they do, someone is out there screaming in their face calling them all type of names. From being nazi’s racist, homophobes. It’s projected in the near future, Whites will no longer be the majority in this country.

3. Gender roles is not always a bad thing. It’s only now with third waves feminisms that gender roles are seen as bad. Worse yet, when a woman chooses to be a stay home mom, other feminist calls them traitors to the female group. Denying them their right to choose.

2 and 3 where the ones I wanted to talk about, with 1 being me not knowing and not caring enough.

1. Climate change does have a factually provable and demonstrable anthropocentric element to it. However, it is often exaggerated or overblown, propaganda is used to shame and brown-beat people into doing unnecessary and even unsafe/stupid things, and there's a whole lotta money to be made with this type of fear-mongering. So leftists use it, hypocritically, dishonestly, and inappropriately to push their agenda. I'm anti-pollution and pro-long-term sustainability.

2. My parenthetical clarification should frame the truth of the position they take. Despite EthnoLester's weird and warped interpretation of my point, I'm only characterizing the xenophobic trait often thrown at conservatives.

3. I do not disagree. And I have been very consistent on my position since the 2000s on KMC: women should have the choice to get to work or not. The man should not: he should work to provide for all his family needs. I do not agree with the concept of "stay at home dad" and I think perfectly healthy stay at home dads are shameful (this leaves wiggle room for less-abled dads who are doing a damn good job taking care of their family and household while their abled wives work: that's still the American dream).

5. This point is much more important than 2 and 3 because it skips 4 and goes straight to 5 and now you looked to check and are mad at me. El oh el.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
I am just repeating verbatim what Trump said to four women of color who are also public servants. You did not consider it racist when he said it, so why is it racist now?

Maybe you should either stop
A. Stop lying
B. Or start reading and understanding what your reading

Stop stop lying or or stop or start reading and understanding what your reading aye?

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Stop stop lying or or stop or start reading and understanding what [B]your reading aye? [/B]

And here comes the grammar police of the internet. But I do love the fact your unable to refuse the points though.

But then again, why am I surprise. White liberals.

I didn't even read your previous points.

Couldn't really counter the one I responded to given that it's unintelligible garbage.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
I didn't even read your previous points.

Couldn't really counter the one I responded to given that it's unintelligible garbage.

We know that’s pure bullshit. You’re like every far left on this site, your can’t refute something, so you go for grammar.

Good job with that.

SquallX is really coming apart at the seams here.

Who's "we"?

You and your imaginary friends?

You're losing the plot.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Who's "we"?

You and your imaginary friends?

You're losing the plot.

Don't be so damn dense. I think everyone understands when he says 'we' he's either referring to all the people who're reading you two's back and forth replies with each other or he's referring to himself and you as the 'we'. You insulting him by accusing him of having "imaginary friends" isn't helping your argument at all. But, like a typical leftist, you resort to insults when you're losing the argument as lefties always do.