Eternal Idol
Lono, "The Dog"
Originally posted by Emperordmb
My problem is that implicitly we're supposed to take children such as her and the Parkland students seriously in politics... but we're not allowed to criticize them because they're just kids. It seems more like she's being used as a propaganda tool and shield from criticism.
Or, they are invested in finding a solution and are using the amount of attention they're receiving in the moment to push for change. That doesn't mean they're right about everything, but the most important parts of their messages either cite research data from experts, or point to successful models.
The typical dismissals are pathetic.
For example:
Parkland survivors: "[We should ban these types of weapons. They're prohibited from civilian use in Australia and these other countries, and they have very few, if any, mass shootings.]"
Murican A: "No! 2nd Amendment! Some bullshit about protection against criminals and a tyrannical government!"
Murican B: "Well, maybe, but that'll never work here. Our cultures are far too different, so we shouldn't try it at all."
Murican C: "I like guns! Guns are cool! I like guns and I feel really cool when I have a gun!"
Murican D: "Even if you take away guns, people will just find other shit to kill each other with. By the way, wasn't there a knife attack a couple of months ago?"
................
Greta Thunberg: "[My generation and future generations are f*cked unless we heed the warnings from the scientific community and make major changes to our way of living and our means of production.]"
Murican A: "She's a puppet of the left! She's spreading propaganda and fear-mongering!"
Murican B: "Well, maybe, but I'll be dead by then, so I don't care."
Murican C: " I like meat! Meat is good! I like meat and I feel really good when I eat meat!"
Murican D: "That sounds inconvenient, so I'd rather not. By the way, where are her parents? Shouldn't she be in school?"