Originally posted by h1a8
That's moving the goalpost.
All I have to show is Superman has the capability or the necessary power to cause that amount of damage.
Correct. And till this moment you have provided zero proof that he can cause that amount of damage. You gave your theories yet never backed it up with proof.
Originally posted by FrothByte
Correct. And till this moment you have provided zero proof that he can cause that amount of damage. You gave your theories yet never backed it up with proof.
That's like asking to prove that Superman can lift a car.
Now you are trolling the thread.
Originally posted by h1a8
I don't have to provide proof that Superman can damage an area that small. It's common sense.That's like asking to prove that Superman can lift a car.
Now you are trolling the thread.
Sorry dude, but that's how the mvf works. You make a claim, you back it up with proof. Without proof, you've got nothing but pure opinions.
Originally posted by FrothByte
Sorry dude, but that's how the mvf works. You make a claim, you back it up with proof. Without proof, you've got nothing but pure opinions.
Asking someone to back up common sense things is a form of trolling. This is a reasonable debate. Anything that becomes unreasonable means sad attempts to Troll.
Proving that Superman can destroy that very small square area is like asking us to prove whether Superman can lift 100 tons.
Originally posted by h1a8
Asking someone to back up common sense things is a form of trolling. This is a reasonable debate. Anything that becomes unreasonable means sad attempts to Troll.Proving that Superman can destroy that very small square area is like asking us to prove whether Superman can lift 100 tons.
It's not common sense if Superman never had a feat to prove he could do it. If he did, it would be easy for you to provide it.
Originally posted by FrothByte
It's not common sense if Superman never had a feat to prove he could do it. If he did, it would be easy for you to provide it.
Having to argue common sense things means the debate is a waste of time (trolling going on).
If you don't believe that Superman can damage that small square area we saw in the first scene (before the domino effect from the cutscenes) then you are not worth debating with
Originally posted by h1a8
Having to argue common sense things means the debate is a waste of time (trolling going on).If you don't believe that Superman can damage that small square area we saw in the first scene (before the domino effect from the cutscenes) then you are not worth debating with
Claiming something is "common sense" when it clearly isn't is trolling of the highest order. Anyway, I'm done going around circles with you. Let me know when you're finally able to provide proof.