Originally posted by SurturNot going to disagree it wasn't the best starter article, because the reports on that story vary. He did murder her after she left him, that is clear, some social media said she was scared to leave him and scared pf him. Which given what happened is possible, the usual buzz words are used, contolling, isolation from friends etc. He was clearly a nut.
It also linked to a lie. Just do better next time, if the incel threat is so bad no need to lie 👆
Originally posted by SurturI'd have to look it all up again, which i did the day it was pointed out the story might be exaggerated to fit the anti incel narrative better. Truth is clearly was barking, you don't murder someone who dumps you as a teen do you, tbh, most teens chop and change relatively quickly. The fact he felt he owned her is the point we should be taking away. This is one of the overarching things in the Incel crap, they want traditional 1950's roles... This ownership is overarching and part of the objectification.
"Some social media". Like who? Not randos, right?
Though early online discussion claimed Devins was killed by an online stalker, Oneida County District Attorney Scott McNamara revealed that prosecutors believe Devins was murdered by an individual she had met online, who to some degree had a real-world relationship with her. Synopsis from the wiki.
Still sounds a lot like an Incel got lucky Surt.