Originally posted by Robtard
I'd have to know the specifics and context, as not everything is either black or white so to speak in reality, no matter how hard you try with your tactics.eg if Buttigeig took $1,000.00 from the anti-Abortion lobby, I'd think that's shit, but he'd not lose my vote on that alone, as $1,000.00 effectively buys zero political pull. I'd also want to know why he did.
Same question to you. Go.
Robtard is alive.. HES ALIVE!
Originally posted by SurturAlready answered that question. Specifics and context is needed.
You didn't answer me though lol. I want a number. So $1,000 to Pete Butt wouldn't cause u to not vote for him, but you wouldn't agree with it.Provide me the number now that would make u not vote for him.
Can you answer your own question now, since you seemingly think it's a simple answer.
But the question seems irrelevant, because any politician taking corporate hand-outs isn't just taking normal people pocket change amounts. They're probably in the hundreds of thousands and millions. So if they're taking corporate hands-outs at all, they're a no-go, because ultimately that's who they are representing. Not we the people.
Originally posted by Patient_Leech
But the question seems irrelevant, because any politician taking corporate hand-outs isn't just taking normal people pocket change amounts. They're probably in the hundreds of thousands and millions. So if they're taking corporate hands-outs at all, they're a no-go, because ultimately that's who they are representing. Not we the people.
Indeed, a person with a fundraising push that brings in 5.000.000 isn't likely to know, or even be able to screen, an individual amount of $50.
Originally posted by Patient_Leech
But the question seems irrelevant, because any politician taking corporate hand-outs isn't just taking normal people pocket change amounts. They're probably in the hundreds of thousands and millions. So if they're taking corporate hands-outs at all, they're a no-go, because ultimately that's who they are representing. Not we the people.
Shady donations are a no go no matter what, yes.
Originally posted by Surtur
Lol you can't even answer the question, troll.
Keep lying, but I did answer you directly it's on the previous page, specifics and context is needed.
eg 2: Now if Buttigeig knowingly took even a dollar from a group like NAMBLA (pedophiles), he'd lose my vote.
Are you going to dodge answering your own question again?
Originally posted by Robtard
Keep lying, but I did answer you directly it's on the previous page, specifics and context is needed.eg 2: Now if Buttigeig knowingly took even a dollar from a group like NAMBLA (pedophiles), he'd lose my vote.
Are you going to dodge answering your own question again?
You literally gave a specific example of getting $1000 bucks and said it wouldn't make u not vote, I asked what the number in that scenario would need to be in order to change that.
What is the number?
We're moving on if your next response doesn't contain a figure. Up to you.
Originally posted by Patient_Leech
Yeah, I like how in Surt's equalized morality world there's no difference between a guy who murdered one person out of self defence and a guy who premeditated the murder of thousands. Morality flatland!
It's more like some little weasel saying "this guy murdered a family of four, but at least he didn't kill as many as Ted Bundy".
Originally posted by Patient_Leech
Yeah, I like how in Surt's equalized morality world there's no difference between a guy who murdered one person out of self defence and a guy who premeditated the murder of thousands. Morality flatland!
It's impossible to murder someone in self-defense, at least in the US. I don't know what sh!tbag country you're thinking of.
Originally posted by Surtur
You literally gave a specific example of getting $1000 bucks and said it wouldn't make u not vote, I asked what the number in that scenario would need to be in order to change that.What is the number?
We're moving on if your next response doesn't contain a figure. Up to you.
Another dodge...
Protip: Don't ask a question that you're uncomfortable answering yourself. Just poor tactics.
Originally posted by Patient_Leech
Yeah, I like how in Surt's equalized morality world there's no difference between a guy who murdered one person out of self defence and a guy who premeditated the murder of thousands. Morality flatland!
I think you meant "killed" in self defense, but yes.
They will use your typo to ignore the meat of your comment.