Originally posted by SurturSo now you've moved on from 'attacked' to 'directly attacked'. That's a good enough admission of your guilt for me.
I see Rob lying, obviously lying. Do you disagree he lied? Do you agree with him that I directly attacked him?I'll never call you out again if you just say he lied. There is evidence so it's no biggie.
🙂
Originally posted by Robtard
So now you've moved on from 'attacked' to 'directly attacked'. That's a good enough admission of your guilt for me.
You said I directly attacked you.
It was a lie.
I'm not saying I was indirectly attacking you, but even if I was that is not a direct attack.
Your lie can be noted by the mods and we can all move on. Or they can gaslight and then it never ends.
Originally posted by Robtard
I don't need more admission of guilt from you, it's been satisfied. Game away though.
Another lie.
This one needs to be noted too by moderators 👆
See I'm nice I'm not even saying ban you. All that needs to be done is to acknowledge you are lying. And since there is clear evidence you are this should not be difficult 🙂
EDIT: And without any weasel moves. No "Rob lied but others do too". Just "Rob lied".
Originally posted by Robtard
You're doing that weird Surt-thing again where you demand people answer a certain way or else. Always worth a giggle.
I kinda agree I should not demand they do it, that is wrong!
I'll just say they lose all authority if they don't.
It's like when a parent tells a child no dessert if they do not finish their vegetables.
The mods are free to forgo dessert if they want 👆
Originally posted by Surtur
I see Rob lying, obviously lying. Do you disagree he lied? Do you agree with him that I directly attacked him?I'll never call you out again if you just say he lied. There is evidence so it's no biggie.
🙂
He says you attacked him. You say you didn't directly attack him. Why should I believe either of you, exactly? I'm not psychic.
You have a pattern of going after people, so even if Rob is wrong, he has reason to believe he was right, doesn't he?
Originally posted by -Pr-
He says you attacked him. You say you didn't directly attack him. Why should I believe either of you, exactly? I'm not psychic.You have a pattern of going after people, so even if Rob is wrong, he has reason to believe he was right, doesn't he?
I responded to *your* post and he claimed it was a *direct* attack on him.
Either you agree or you do not. The posts are here for you to view.
If you can't even just call out a lie then stop asking people not to behave a certain way 👆
Originally posted by Surtur
I kinda agree I should not demand they do it, that is wrong!I'll just say they lose all authority if they don't.
It's like when a parent tells a child no dessert if they do not finish their vegetables.
The mods are free to forgo dessert if they want 👆
Surt, you're also in no position to dictate who has or hasn't lost authority.
Originally posted by Surtur
But I did.If mods can't even point out an obvious truth they are no longer mods.
Or at least not qualified to be mods.
You said it, sure, but no one is going to do what you want. So no, you're not really dictating, you're more ranting like a crazy homeless man on the corner about the clouds.
Originally posted by Robtard
You said it, sure, but no one is going to do what you want. So no, you're not really dictating, you're more ranting like a crazy homeless man on the corner about the clouds.
But they will do what I want: which is look the other way and not ban folk when you and your pals future threads get derailed
Just watch how nobody gets banned over it 🙂
Originally posted by Surtur
I responded to *your* post and he claimed it was a *direct* attack on him.Either you agree or you do not. The posts are here for you to view.
If you can't even just call out a lie then stop asking people not to behave a certain way 👆
I actually don't agree with him, because like I said, I don't know intent.
IYou got my answer. If it's not good enough for you, that's not my problem.