Coronavirus

Started by Robtard504 pages

Originally posted by Surtur
But they will do what I want: which is look the other way and not ban folk when you and your pals future threads get derailed

Just watch how nobody gets banned over it 🙂

As noted, you've been derailing my threads for years and you've not been banned. So you're pretend winning again and it's silly, though sad/humorous to watch.

Originally posted by -Pr-
I actually don't agree with him, because like I said, I don't know intent.

IYou got my answer. If it's not good enough for you, that's not my problem.

I mean, you could say my intent was to respond to you and indirectly attack Rob. That is what he is saying. But I responded to you before even reading his response.

Even if I didn't it is an indirect attack. So you can agree it is not a direct attack? How does intent factor in? If I was directly attacking him I would have quoted his post. If my *intent* was to attack Rob it was still indirectly lol.

So I'm confused.

Originally posted by -Pr-
I actually don't agree with him, because like I said, I don't know intent.

IYou got my answer. If it's not good enough for you, that's not my problem.

World War PR

Originally posted by Robtard
As noted, you've been derailing my threads for years and you've not been banned. So you're pretend winning again and it's silly, though sad/humorous to watch.

You mean he derailed your bait threads.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack

World War PR

I don't get it, it's similar mod excuses but now they are...I dunno, cyclops?

Originally posted by Surtur
I mean, you could say my intent was to respond to you and indirectly attack Rob. That is what he is saying. But I responded to you before even reading his response.

Even if I didn't it is an indirect attack. So you can agree it is not a direct attack? How does intent factor in? If I was directly attacking him I would have quoted his post. If my *intent* was to attack Rob it was still indirectly lol.

So I'm confused.

I don't know enough to know that it was an attack on him, so I disagree with him.

What part of that isn't clear?

Originally posted by Surtur
I don't get it, it's similar mod excuses but now they are...I dunno, cyclops?

Reasons and excuses aren't the same thing.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
How man I mad, butthurt man?

I would say 22 posts calling people "butthurt" today alone mad. Creating, on average, 3 new threads a day crying about other people mad. That is how mad you are.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
You mean he derailed your bait threads.

I mean he tries to derail most every thread I make. It's fine, it's kinda an expected thing after all these years.

Originally posted by -Pr-
I don't know enough to know that it was an attack on him, so I disagree with him.

What part of that isn't clear?

Reasons and excuses aren't the same thing.

I guess the issue is you try to put in an escape clause with this "I don't know enough".

Either it was a *direct* attack or it wasn't. Even if me and Rob were immortals beefing for 1,000 years it would still not be a direct attack.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
I would say 22 posts calling people "butthurt" today alone mad. Creating, on average, 3 new threads a day crying about other people mad. That is how mad you are.

False

Originally posted by Surtur
I guess the issue is you try to put in an escape clause with this "I don't know enough".

Either it was a *direct* attack or it wasn't. Even if me and Rob were immortals beefing for 1,000 years it would still not be a direct attack.

No, I'm just telling you I don't know enough. Why would I even need an escape clause? It's not like I answer to any of you.

Okay, and?

Originally posted by -Pr-
No, I'm just telling you I don't know enough. Why would I even need an escape clause? It's not like I answer to any of you.

Okay, and?

See you keep acting like you need some massive understanding...

Originally posted by -Pr-
No, I'm just telling you I don't know enough. Why would I even need an escape clause? It's not like I answer to any of you.

Okay, and?

Who do you answer to besides your lover Badabing?

Originally posted by Surtur
See you keep acting like you need some massive understanding...

He's already said he doesn't agree with me, is your penis so tiny you need to still play your silly games.

Originally posted by Robtard
He's already said he doesn't agree with me, is your penis so tiny you need to still play your silly games.

He didn't actually say you lied tho

Originally posted by Robtard
He's already said he doesn't agree with me, is your penis so tiny you need to still play your silly games.

Shut up Dotard

Originally posted by Surtur
I don't get it, it's similar mod excuses but now they are...I dunno, cyclops?

its an inside joke

Originally posted by Surtur
He didn't actually say you lied tho

Cos I didn't lie. You playing your stupid "I didn't attack you but if I did it wasn't direct so I win!" games over and over is just that. Stupid games.

How's your back today btw?

Originally posted by Robtard
Cos I didn't lie. You playing your stupid "I didn't attack you but if I did it wasn't direct so I win!" games over and over is just that. Stupid games.

How's your back today btw?

Lol but...you did. You said I directly attacked you.

This did not happen.

Originally posted by Robtard
Cos I didn't lie. You playing your stupid "I didn't attack you but if I did it wasn't direct so I win!" games over and over is just that. Stupid games.

How's your back today btw?

In case PR did know, this is an attack on Surturs physical health because Surtur has bad back problems.

Basically, he's trying to skate right around you with this one trying to act like hes an innocent angel.