Coronavirus

Originally posted by Insane Titan
again another lie , I said either way.

So again this proof without lying this time if you’re capable.

Use that all you want as your excuse as that date has never changed over time even back in Early august the figures of deaths/reactions were lower.

What’s your excuse now ?

Not a lie, you did claim numbers where being hidden, but you know, cos reasons

HYG again, from your own site:

"Usage of the vaccines has increased over the course of the campaigns and as such, so has reporting of fatal events with a temporal association with vaccination. However, this does not indicate a link between vaccination and the fatalities reported. Review of individual reports and patterns of reporting does not suggest the vaccines played a role in these deaths." -snip

Originally posted by Insane Titan
keep ignoring if it makes you feel safe , are the reactions wrong too ?

Who cares , the only people that care about left or right are weak people eh lib nazi.

Maybe you should find a site that's more inline with your biases? Cos that one clearly states that a direct link to those low deaths and vaccinations is inconclusive. Their words, not mine.

I've already stated multiple times that there's going to be a small percentage of the population that is going to have allergic or adverse reactions to any vaccine. In your fuming "true centrist" rage, you keep missing it.

The Earth is not overpopulated.

It's just humans are terrible for the environment.

Originally posted by Klaw
The Earth is not overpopulated.

It's just humans are terrible for the environment.

^In an extremely rare moment, Klaw said something else that is correct.

The planet could easily support more people and be clean, we'd just have to get to an original Star Trek-like mentality where no ones greedy and everyone is working for each other. Not going to happen.

Originally posted by Robtard
^In an extremely rare moment, Klaw said something else that is correct.

The planet could easily support more people and be clean, we'd just have to get to an original Star Trek-like mentality where no ones greedy and everyone is working for each other. Not going to happen.

Originally posted by Robtard
Not a lie, you did claim numbers where being hidden, but you know, cos reasons

HYG again, from your own site:

"Usage of the vaccines has increased over the course of the campaigns and as such, so has reporting of fatal events with a temporal association with vaccination. [b]However, this does not indicate a link between vaccination and the fatalities reported. Review of individual reports and patterns of reporting does not suggest the vaccines played a role in these deaths." -snip [/B]

You’re too dumb to realise that banner I showed you was a earlier account with lower figures. So why do the figures keep going up. Please tell me your excuse this time.

Originally posted by Robtard
Maybe you should find a site that's more inline with your biases? Cos that one clearly states that a direct link to those low deaths and vaccinations is inconclusive. Their words, not mine.

I've already stated multiple times that there's going to be a small percentage of the population that is going to have allergic or adverse reactions to any vaccine. In your fuming "true centrist" rage, you keep missing it.

You said no deaths or reactions when it shows otherwise regardless of the numbers.

You keep labelling me as a centrist as if that bothers me in any way or is true. I judge things Instance by instance/case by case one way or the other/left or right. Unlike you that is rigid to a political stance with no deviation out of fear and lack of awareness of getting labelled anything other than left.

Simple question have people died from any of the vaccines , simple yes or no.

Originally posted by Insane Titan
again another lie , I never they was hidden that’s a second lie, first you said I said they was higher. If you’re gonna lie at least be consistent.

You’re too dumb to realise that banner I showed you was a earlier account with lower figures. So why do the figures keep going up. Please tell me your excuse this time.

Here you go, that's you claiming the real numbers, which you believe are higher will be kept hidden:

Originally posted by Insane Titan
The true figures on any of it will never be revealed either way sadly to say.

Do some more flips now

Originally posted by Insane Titan
also you keep saying my bias, what bias ?

You said no deaths or reactions when it shows otherwise regardless of the numbers.

You keep labelling me as a centrist as if that bothers me in any way or is true. I judge things Instance by instance/case by case one way or the other/left or right. Unlike you that is rigid to a political stance with no deviation out of fear and lack of awareness of getting labelled anything other than left.

Simple question have people died from any of the vaccines , simple yes or no.

That would be your desperate bias into needing to believe that a vaccine is more dangerous than the virus it's meant to combat, when the science simply does not support your silly conclusion.

More strawman nonsense, I've always said there's going to be a percentage of the population that will react negatively to any vaccine, it's just a very small number.

I said it again just yesterday in this quote, to Deano, so please keep lying and attacking arguments you invented, it's funny:

Originally posted by Robtard

But there is a very small percentage of the population that will have allergic or adverse reactions to any given vaccine.

Whatever you need to tell your "centrist" self, I really don't care, you're the one who brought Left/Right politics into the convo, not me, dumdum.

Why do deaths from the vaccine suddenly matter to these anti-vax retards who claim 2/100 deaths from Covid is not even worth concerning ourselves with ?

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Why do deaths from the vaccine suddenly matter to these anti-vax retards who claim 2/100 deaths from Covid is not even worth concerning ourselves with ?

This is a good point.

Originally posted by Insane Titan
again another lie , I said either way.

So again this proof without lying this time if you’re capable.

Use that all you want as your excuse as that date has never changed over time even back in Early august the figures of deaths/reactions were lower.

What’s your excuse now ?

8.9M cases and 140K deaths since May 2020.

It's highest peak deaths were in April 2020 (with peaks around 1,000 per day) and January 2021 (with peaks of around 1,400 per day)

These just so happened to be the times when lockdowns were starting to become more leniant. The lowest rates of deaths were August 2020 and May 2021 (around 10 deaths per day) when lockdowns and vaccinations were in full force. You can see the graph on google: https://www.google.com/search?q=deaths+due+to+covid+uk+2021&rlz=1CADKLE_enGB977&oq=deaths+due+to+covid+uk+2021&aqs=chrome..69i57j0i22i30j0i390l2.14816j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

Just shut the **** up.

Originally posted by Insane Titan
lie all you want it makes little difference to me. You flat out lying about what’s stated plain as day as adverse reaction on the government website just to try and score point based on your political stance shows how weak minded you are.

Hey, dipshit, "adverse events" are anything one experiences after receiving a particular treatment. In other words, they are physical experience that are correlated with, but not necessarily caused by the treatment. One can take acetaminophen and have a heart attack, and it does not follow from this that the acetaminophen caused the heart attack. It is an adverse event, and it is documented, so that it can be investigated, and eliminated as a factor. It is not a side-effect of the medicine.

Notice how Robtard keeps saying "react negatively" to the vaccine.

Funny way of avoiding saying some have died.

Originally posted by Robtard
Here you go, that's you claiming the real numbers, which you believe are higher will be kept hidden:

Do some more flips now

Originally posted by Robtard
That would be your desperate bias into needing to believe that a vaccine is more dangerous than the virus it's meant to combat, when the science simply does not support your silly conclusion.

More strawman nonsense, I've always said there's going to be a percentage of the population that will react negatively to any vaccine, it's just a very small number.

I said it again just yesterday in this quote, to Deano, so please keep lying and attacking arguments you invented, it's funny:

Whatever you need to tell your "centrist" self, I really don't care, you're the one who brought Left/Right politics into the convo, not me, dumdum.

Yeah I brought it in because it’s your go to based on anybodies point you don’t agree as proven on any topic. Because you lack any common sense due to you beliefs isn’t my fault.

Originally posted by Klaw
Notice how Robtard keeps saying "react negatively" to the vaccine.

Funny way of avoiding saying some have died.

Because it's inconclusive, as the website says, you doofus.

On a personal level, there are likely some direct deaths from the worst of those reaction, likely due to some other preexisting factor, but it's going to be an astronomically small number of deaths compared to how many people have been vaccinated and extremely smaller than the number who have died from covid. It's a numbers game, vaccinations are safer than getting covid without.

You're another of these types who got vaccinated because you didn't want to risk your own health, but cast doubt of the vaccination for other people. Truly deplorable.

Originally posted by Blakemore
https://github.com/CSSEGISandData/COVID-19 this is a scientific study of the consequences of the virus.

8.9M cases and 140K deaths since May 2020.

It's highest peak deaths were in April 2020 (with peaks around 1,000 per day) and January 2021 (with peaks of around 1,400 per day)

These just so happened to be the times when lockdowns were starting to become more leniant. The lowest rates of deaths were August 2020 and May 2021 (around 10 deaths per day) when lockdowns and vaccinations were in full force. You can see the graph on google: https://www.google.com/search?q=deaths+due+to+covid+uk+2021&rlz=1CADKLE_enGB977&oq=deaths+due+to+covid+uk+2021&aqs=chrome..69i57j0i22i30j0i390l2.14816j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

Just shut the **** up.

Lmao, you think they study over rides official gov figures yet you all ignore the Isreal study on natural immunity.

Run your mouth all you want son, it makes no difference to me.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Hey, dipshit, "adverse events" are anything one experiences after receiving a particular treatment. In other words, they are physical experience that are correlated with, but not necessarily caused by the treatment. One can take acetaminophen and have a heart attack, and it does not follow from this that the acetaminophen caused the heart attack. It is an adverse event, and it is documented, so that it can be investigated, and eliminated as a factor. It is not a side-effect of the medicine.

Originally posted by Insane Titan
again I’m waiting for me saying the numbers are higher and hidden. You lying every time doesn’t make it so.

It's implied right in your quote, you weren't saying the hidden numbers are actually lower for the claimed adverse reactions and deaths, as that would bugger your whole argument. Keep spinning doh.