Originally posted by RobtardHow’s is it? You claimed no deaths. Where do you think the reactions and the deaths that have the same symptoms as the deaths come from. My beliefs have zero today with it , I go on facts and data, unlike who sworn to a political ideology and stance where as I have non left or right. You’ve shown your hand many a time.
Now the starwmen bashing comes out because you're own site counters your beliefs.
Originally posted by Robtardwhat conspiracy you idiot ? Did I say anything about a conspiracy , because if I did let’s see your proof il wait while you try to lie again like a child. I said people had died from the vac with countless adverse reactions.
Your own site says it's inconclusive...But as already noted and you magically glossed over it, even if we accept that less than 600 people have died from a direct link to the Pfizer, the statistics of morality to covid blow away your conspiracy fueled nonsense. Get madder now.
So again post my big conspiracy , il wait.
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Oh they've been doing all those other things too, rest assured.But they've recently stepped-up their timetable of mass depopulation by using covid "vaccines". They kill much quicker than those other methods which could take decades.
Oh, and you left out chem trails, btw.
Just did a fact check.
Current world population: 7.753 billion (2020)
Theoretical maximum sustainable population: Many scientists think Earth has a maximum carrying capacity of 9 billion to 10 billion people. One such scientist, the eminent Harvard University sociobiologist Edward O. Wilson, bases his estimate on calculations of the Earth's available resources.Oct 11, 2011
Theoretical ideal population: 1.5 to 2 billion people
The optimum population of Earth – enough to guarantee the minimal physical ingredients of a decent life to everyone – was 1.5 to 2 billion people rather than the 7 billion who are alive today or the 9 billion expected in 2050, said Ehrlich in an interview with the Guardian.Apr 26, 2012
And suddenly this conspiracy theory sounds more credible.
Originally posted by Insane Titan
How’s is it? You claimed no deaths. Where do you think the reactions and the deaths that have the same symptoms as the deaths come from. My beliefs have zero today with it , I go on facts and data, unlike who sworn to a political ideology and stance where as I have non left or right. You’ve shown your hand many a time.
Cos I questioned where the "confirmed deaths" where on your site and it's inconclusive.
Oh, you're a "centrist", makes total sense now.
Originally posted by Insane Titan
what conspiracy you idiot ? Did I say anything about a conspiracy , because if I did let’s see your proof il wait while you try to lie again like a child. I said people had died from the vac with countless adverse reactions.So again post my big conspiracy , il wait.
Where you mentioned how the number of reactions/deaths is much higher and you now this, but it will never come out. /That
Keep stewing over this tidbit:
"Usage of the vaccines has increased over the course of the campaigns and as such, so has reporting of fatal events with a temporal association with vaccination. However, this does not indicate a link between vaccination and the fatalities reported. Review of individual reports and patterns of reporting does not suggest the vaccines played a role in these deaths." -snip
Originally posted by Robtardhow is it inconclusive it gives numbers if death by each vac with only a fraction estimated reported.
Cos I questioned where the "confirmed deaths" where on your site and it's inconclusive.Oh, you're a "centrist", makes total sense now.
Bwhahaha you’re tragic. Don’t tell me you have to be left or you’re wrong eh lib nazi.
Originally posted by Insane Titan
how is it inconclusive it gives numbers if death by each vac with only a fraction estimated reported.Bwhahaha you’re tragic. Don’t tell me you have to be left or you’re wrong eh lib nazi.
Because your site literally questions any direct links to the deaths and vaccination... Keep ignoring that.
Just noting you're a "centrist' and it totally fits.
Originally posted by Robtardagain another lie , I said either way.
Where you mentioned how the number of reactions/deaths is much higher and you now this, but it will never come out. /ThatKeep stewing over this tidbit:
"Usage of the vaccines has increased over the course of the campaigns and as such, so has reporting of fatal events with a temporal association with vaccination. [b]However, this does not indicate a link between vaccination and the fatalities reported. Review of individual reports and patterns of reporting does not suggest the vaccines played a role in these deaths.
" -snip [/B]
So again this proof without lying this time if you’re capable.
Use that all you want as your excuse as that date has never changed over time even back in Early august the figures of deaths/reactions were lower.
What’s your excuse now ?
Originally posted by Robtardkeep ignoring if it makes you feel safe , are the reactions wrong too ?
Because your site literally questions any direct links to the deaths and vaccination... Keep ignoring that.Just noting you're a "centrist' and it totally fits.
Who cares , the only people that care about left or right are weak people eh lib nazi.