Thanos vs. WW, Aquaman and Cyborg

Originally posted by Silent Master
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rebutting
b: to expose the falsity of : REFUTE
_______________________

Now that we've dealt with your silly attempt at semantics. Why the double standard in regards to Captain America and Wonder Woman

No double standard.

Originally posted by h1a8
No double standard.

Then where is the example of Wonder Woman performing the exact tactic you claimed?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Then where is the example of Wonder Woman performing the exact tactic you claimed?

Not every action needs a scene to prove a character will choose to do that action.

There is no universal rule. If you can articulate to an acceptable degree that Cap will choose to tackle someone to the ground without a scene to show it then it proves his case.

The problem is you can't properly articulate that.

That’s your rule you idiot

Originally posted by h1a8
Not every action needs a scene to prove a character will choose to do that action.

There is no universal rule. If you can articulate to an acceptable degree that Cap will choose to tackle someone to the ground without a scene to show it then it proves his case.

The problem is you can't properly articulate that.

Only, you didn't articulate to an acceptable degree how Wonder Woman cutting people's heads off would be in character. Yet, according to you no specific feat was needed. So this attempt at an excuse also fails.

So, why the double standard?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Only, you didn't articulate to an acceptable degree how Wonder Woman cutting people's heads off would be in character. Yet, according to you no specific feat was needed. So this attempt at an excuse also fails.

So, why the double standard?

WW slicing off limbs and willing to kill gives her the character to attempt to behead. If you disagree then we just agree to disagree.

Originally posted by h1a8
WW slicing off limbs and willing to kill gives her the character to attempt to behead. If you disagree then we just agree to disagree.

I already explained why your logic is faulty, pretending to not remember is trolling.

Back to the topic, why the double standard?

Originally posted by Silent Master
I already explained why your logic is faulty, pretending to not remember is trolling.

Back to the topic, why the double standard?

lies. you never explained why my logic is faulty.

Originally posted by h1a8
lies. you never explained why my logic is faulty.

Further proof that h1 is a liar

Originally posted by Silent Master
First, she cut off one limb, not limbs. If you have to exaggerate to try and make your point stronger. it's not much of a point. 2nd you can't combine two separate feats to claim something is in-character.

Here is an example to illustrate your faulty logic, WW has hit people. WW has killed. therefore it's in-character for her to punch Batman's head off in a forum fight.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Further proof that h1 is a liar

If a character is very intelligent (not stupid) and views a powerful enemy as a statue and want's to kill them then it's clearly in character for WW to think about cutting Thanos head off.

That doesn't mean she will think of it in the fight though. She might decide to kill Thanos by stabbing him.

But like I said, we can agree to disagree. By me attempting to articulate this reason means I'm not using a double standard. Doesn't matter if I convince you or not.

Why did you lie?

Originally posted by h1a8
lies. you never explained why my logic is faulty.

Originally posted by Silent Master
First, she cut off one limb, not limbs. If you have to exaggerate to try and make your point stronger. it's not much of a point. 2nd you can't combine two separate feats to claim something is in-character.

Here is an example to illustrate your faulty logic, WW has hit people. WW has killed. therefore it's in-character for her to punch Batman's head off in a forum fight.

Originally posted by h1a8
If a character is very intelligent (not stupid) and views a powerful enemy as a statue and want's to kill them then it's clearly in character for WW to think about cutting Thanos head off.

That doesn't mean she will think of it in the fight though. She might decide to kill Thanos by stabbing him.

But like I said, we can agree to disagree. By me attempting to articulate this reason means I'm not using a double standard. Doesn't matter if I convince you or not.

So I have always agreed with this part, I feel like we nerf characters hard when we only let them fight the way the writers did. We are not progressing a story.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Why did you lie?

We agree to disagree.
WW has a probable chance of going for the head, juggler, or limb.

Originally posted by h1a8
We agree to disagree.
WW has a probable chance of going for the head, juggler, or limb.

No, that was clearly an example you lying.

So, why did you lie?

Originally posted by Silent Master
No, that was clearly an example you lying.

So, why did you lie?

You are begging the question.

Originally posted by h1a8
You are begging the question.

No, I proved you lied and then asked why.

Originally posted by Silent Master
No, I proved you lied and then asked why.

False statement.

Originally posted by h1a8
lies. you never explained why my logic is faulty.

Yes I did, here is the proof.

Originally posted by Silent Master
First, she cut off one limb, not limbs. If you have to exaggerate to try and make your point stronger. it's not much of a point. 2nd you can't combine two separate feats to claim something is in-character.

Here is an example to illustrate your faulty logic, WW has hit people. WW has killed. therefore it's in-character for her to punch Batman's head off in a forum fight.

Now, why did you lie?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Yes I did, here is the proof.

Now, why did you lie?

That doesn't show me lying

Yes it does, here is the proof.

Originally posted by h1a8
lies. you never explained why my logic is faulty.

Originally posted by Silent Master
First, she cut off one limb, not limbs. If you have to exaggerate to try and make your point stronger. it's not much of a point. 2nd you can't combine two separate feats to claim something is in-character.

Here is an example to illustrate your faulty logic, WW has hit people. WW has killed. therefore it's in-character for her to punch Batman's head off in a forum fight.

Now, why did you lie?