Thanos vs. WW, Aquaman and Cyborg

Originally posted by Silent Master
Yes it does, here is the proof.

Now, why did you lie?

That's not a lie. Do you know what a lie is?
Whats a lie?

Originally posted by h1a8
That's not a lie. Do you know what a lie is?
Whats a lie?

An intentionally false statement. Oh, I see. while it was obviously a false statement, you're trying to get out of it by saying that it wasn't intentional.

In that case, I'll accept you saying that it wasn't a lie, you were just wrong. But, you have to actually say that you were wrong.

Go ahead.

Originally posted by Silent Master
An intentionally false statement. Oh, I see. while it was obviously a false statement, you're trying to get out of it by saying that it wasn't intentional.

In that case, I'll accept you saying that it wasn't a lie, you were just wrong. But, you have to actually say that you were wrong.

Go ahead.

I didn't see your attempt to explain why my logic is flawed when I posted "you never explained..."
So therefore it wasn't a lie.

So. You weren't lying, you were just wrong?

Originally posted by Silent Master
So. You weren't lying, you were just wrong?

If "I explained to you why your logic is flawed." means" I explained to you why I think your logic is flawed." then I told made a false statement.

You didnt successfully SHOW why my logic is flawed.

So. You weren't lying, you were just wrong?

Originally posted by Silent Master
So. You weren't lying, you were just wrong?

Bad word choice. I was not wrong. If the stipulations I gave are met then I made a false statement.

Originally posted by h1a8
Bad word choice. I was not wrong. If the stipulations I gave are met then I made a false statement.

If your statement was false, that means you were wrong.

So. You weren't lying, you were just wrong?

Originally posted by Silent Master
If your statement was false, that means you were wrong.

So. You weren't lying, you were just wrong?

No it doesn't.
As it depends on the semantics of the statement "I explained to you why your logic is flawed."

Yes you attempted to show it.

Everyone that reads this thread will be able to see that I've provided more than enough proof that you were wrong, I was just giving you a chance to salvage some credibility.

Back to the main topic, why the double standard in regards to what counts as proof?

Why is it your debating style is to ask loaded question begging questions, knowing no one will answer them. Wouldn't it a less waste of time arguing directly?

Stop begging the question and asking loaded questions. You are just wasting your time.

You have to first prove there is a double standard, not assume it.

Given your double standards, it's a valid question.

So, why the double standard in regards to what counts as proof?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Given your double standards, it's a valid question.

So, why the double standard in regards to what counts as proof?

Good luck

So, why the double standard in regards to what counts as proof?

H1 just basically waving the white flag there now. 😂

Originally posted by Nibedicus
H1 just basically waving the white flag there now. 😂

Pretty much. I just disagree with Silent.

Anyway WW can beat Thanos solo here.

Originally posted by Nibedicus
H1 just basically waving the white flag there now. 😂

Yep.

Concession accepted from the troll H1. He’s a joke of a man.

Originally posted by h1a8
We agree to disagree.
WW has a probable chance of going for the head, juggler, or limb.

Now your assuming he has a jugular?

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Now your assuming he has a jugular?

Yup. How else will blood get to his brain?