Originally posted by dadudemon
And left-wing.Do you have a credible citation for your claim about "right-wing" because what we learned in college was they come from every part of society, all shapes and sizes, all backgrounds, with no differentiation. Obviously, the rich are far better at covering it up.
As I've said, Catholics and our problems are big news.
No one ever talks about pedofile's from other religions, except small outlets. Funny that.
Originally posted by Putinbot1
Ahh, this is questionable. Many would say Greta Thunberg has a better and more focused view on what is best for this planet and life on it than the POTUS...
But she doesn't. That's a bad comparison. Comparing Greta's grasp on what is best for the planet and life with almost anyone is a bad idea.
Let me see if I can find an exception to my point so I can make your point even better.*
But before that, finding exceptions to my point doesn't refute my point. You're just finding exceptions to try and avoid the actual point. This is known as the exceptions fallacy.
Often, you see scientists from unrelated fields making stupid statements about politics and policy. There's a reason for that: they are not experts in those fields.
Should medical doctors, psychologists, and family service professionals create and inform drug policy? Yes, they should. They are directly involved, from a research and support perspective, those who use and/or abuse drugs.
Should a 19 year old, second year, Bernie Sanders voter, who comes from an upper middle class family, create drug policies because they enjoy getting high on x at their favorite club or pad? No, probably not. But that's not how politics work. This person has an equal weight vote with an ER Medical Doctor who treats the dehydrated, dying, or dead victims of x use. That's odd. But, hey, that's democracy.
We end up with propaganda puppets in the form of Greta who have greater influences on policy than climatologists who tell us about ice ages from millions of years ago when the atmospheric CO2 was 12 times higher than now but 3 times colder than now.
*I cannot think of a good exception. The ones I can think of actually worked in areas related to policy and, therefore, don't work as an exception.
Originally posted by cdtm
As I've said, Catholics and our problems are big news.No one ever talks about pedofile's from other religions, except small outlets. Funny that.
Catholic church is a much larger target and people hated going to church. They also hate their life choices and their self-perceived sins. So they go after the Church to help them with their cognitive dissonance. "See, this church is bad. My premarital sex is okay. Right? So is my alcoholism and drug use. So is my fapping. RIGHT? GOD?"
Originally posted by dadudemonCan't believe two lines triggered that... will reply fully in the week.
But she doesn't. That's a bad comparison. Comparing Greta's grasp on what is best for the planet and life with almost anyone is a bad idea.Let me see if I can find an exception to my point so I can make your point even better.*
But before that, finding exceptions to my point doesn't refute my point. You're just finding exceptions to try and avoid the actual point. This is known as the exceptions fallacy.
Often, you see scientists from unrelated fields making stupid statements about politics and policy. There's a reason for that: they are not experts in those fields.
Should medical doctors, psychologists, and family service professionals create and inform drug policy? Yes, they should. They are directly involved, from a research and support perspective, those who use and/or abuse drugs.
Should a 19 year old, second year, Bernie Sanders voter, who comes from an upper middle class family, create drug policies because they enjoy getting high on x at their favorite club or pad? No, probably not. But that's not how politics work. This person has an equal weight vote with an ER Medical Doctor who treats the dehydrated, dying, or dead victims of x use. That's odd. But, hey, that's democracy.
We end up with propaganda puppets in the form of Greta who have greater influences on policy than climatologists who tell us about ice ages from millions of years ago when the atmospheric CO2 was 12 times higher than now but 3 times colder than now.
*I cannot think of a good exception. The ones I can think of actually worked in areas related to policy and, therefore, don't work as an exception.
To CDTM it's not just the Catholics many religions are steeped in paedophilia. In fact some are indeed started by them and finance charitable organisations to outsource the operations... What do you think DDM?
Originally posted by Putinbot1
Can't believe two lines triggered that... will reply fully in the week.
If you're too immature to hold an adult conversation by relegating it all to wanker dialogue like 'lol, u got triggered', then engaging in any type of adult conversation with you is not a good use of my time.
I had assumed you were interested in a legitimate conversation, not the Surt-Robtard time waster games.
No one is triggered. No one is mad. If you just want to troll or one-up, great, I'm out. But if you're legitimately interested in learning new things or being exposed to informed opinions which may not necessarily align with yours, I'm still game.
Originally posted by Putinbot1
What do you think DDM?
I think sex trafficking and sex slavery are far more rampant than creepy perverted priests in the Catholic church. That's by the numbers. So I guess I didn't state what I think, yet. What I think is people focus on things that seem scandalous and like to call out what they view as hypocrisy. And it's also all the other stuff I said: people want to attack the biggest church in the world because most of them don't want to readily acknowledge their perceived sins. So they go after the thing that taught them they are sinning. Makes them feel better.
Originally posted by dadudemonDDM, of course I will respond to your walls of text rationally and politely. 🙂
If you're too immature to hold an adult conversation by relegating it all to wanker dialogue like 'lol, u got triggered', then engaging in any type of adult conversation with you is not a good use of my time.I had assumed you were interested in a legitimate conversation, not the Surt-Robtard time waster games.
No one is triggered. No one is mad. If you just want to troll or one-up, great, I'm out. But if you're legitimately interested in learning new things or being exposed to informed opinions which may not necessarily align with yours, I'm still game.
I think sex trafficking and sex slavery are far more rampant than creepy perverted priests in the Catholic church. That's by the numbers. So I guess I didn't state what I think, yet. What I think is people focus on things that seem scandalous and like to call out what they view as hypocrisy. And it's also all the other stuff I said: people want to attack the biggest church in the world because most of them don't want to readily acknowledge their perceived sins. So they go after the thing that taught them they are sinning. Makes them feel better.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
gotta love people who have nothing to do all day besides posture and seek peer-approval online...they all just assume that everyone else has the same disposable time and empty schedule. 🙂
^gotta love washed up alcoholics who crush on and then net stalk 16 yr. old girls and white knight for trolls 🙂
Originally posted by Bashar TegFunniest thing is his kept being the most critical of that behaviour.... FYY me Sancncty, Welshy, Shelphie, Fox etc. I could go on........ we were like 15 and I'm not joking....... luckily by 18 I went to to university so i missed the most of the 19/20 shit but I'm pretty sure this cvnt hurt them. This was 2011 on gathethering static when david masters harassesed young girls on twitter..... so theres that.... its this ****.
gotta love people who have nothing to do all day besides posture and seek peer-approval online...they all just assume that everyone else has the same disposable time and empty schedule. 🙂