Who could survive sundipped Superman punch?

Originally posted by TheHulkster
You all have changed the wording of the debate from "stable" to "real" or "physical", creating a strawman. WF's multiverse is unstable which is why it "collapsed"/"blinked" out of existence.

We had this convo before, you think fake = doesn’t exist.

The fake actually means not the original.

If I cloned you, the clone is a fake while you’re the original but that doesn’t mean the clone doesn’t exist. SmH
It’s like you whack one guy and his buddy pops up with the same arguments that have already been answered.

They all die.

That's not what fake means in that story. The source wall was broken, nothing is as it seems.

Originally posted by JBL
That's not what fake means in that story. The source wall was broken, nothing is as it seems.

You'll have to excuse him, it's not his fault. He lost his password too, you know.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
You'll have to excuse him, it's not his fault. He lost his password too, you know.

😂

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
You'll have to excuse him, it's not his fault. He lost his password too, you know.

Please link to this alleged conversation.

Anyhow, JBL is right. "Fake" in that story means not real or at least not yet made real. And in comics, you can actual touch and interact with things that are not real. Tell me what it means when Hawkgirl calls it a hypethetical reality.

Also, you are responding to a post where I am discussing "stability". Why are you bringing up "fake"?

It's like playing whack a mole with you guys

Originally posted by Diesldude
😂 it’s like playing a game of whack a mole. Smh

Omg so true

Originally posted by TheHulkster
Please link to this alleged conversation.

Anyhow, JBL is right. "Fake" in that story means not real or at least not yet made real. And in comics, you can actual touch and interact with things that are not real. Tell me what it means when Hawkgirl calls it a hypethetical reality.

Also, you are responding to a post where I am discussing "stability". Why are you bringing up "fake"?

It's like playing whack a mole with you guys

Here you go.

Originally posted by Diesldude
yeah take a child’s explanation/ terminology for whats real and fake, a kid that was questioning his own existence based on his limited understanding of the events. And fake doesnt mean it doesnt exist, it could just mean its not the original.

According to your scan, the multiverse got blinked out, can’t get any clearer than that, Superman’s punch snuffed it. His punched destroyed infinite universes and infinite abstracts in each universe. No way RKT survives thatS.

Originally posted by TheHulkster
Please link to this alleged conversation.

Anyhow, JBL is right. "Fake" in that story means not real or at least not yet made real. And in comics, you can actual touch and interact with things that are not real. Tell me what it means when Hawkgirl calls it a hypethetical reality.

Also, you are responding to a post where I am discussing "stability". Why are you bringing up "fake"?

It's like playing whack a mole with you guys

Originally posted by TheHulkster
Nothing in that quote says it's stable. In the actual book, it is referred to as a hypethetical reality and a fake reality. And this is beside the point of how whatever it is is destroyed. Clearly not by the force of any punch.

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
Because you're the first person who bringing the fake reality/hypothetical arguments in the first place

And then I also give you such as mxy destroying all existence so WF will have background to replace/descend his multiverse(IOW, This multiverse already existing in there)
Or when you arguing there only future JL's world is real/stable, I give you the example Apokolips or the pocket universe that wf designed to trap superman are both very real and no indications to prove they aren't stable

Just like I lost my password, you Superman fans lost this debate. Get over it. Superman has other great and impressive feats that he actually did, so don't cry, Superman will be just fine without this debunked multiverse destroying punch. 😁

I quoted what was in the book. Show me where I said that "fake" means not existing. All of this is related to the universes instability.

You hold on to the notion of Superman destroying a multiverse with the force of his punch which is laughable to any readers who are not battle board obsessed Superman fanboys. You declare the issue's editor as being wrong.

Originally posted by JBL
Just like I lost my password, you Superman fans lost this debate. Get over it. Superman has other great and impressive feats that he actually did, so don't cry, Superman will be just fine without this debunked multiverse destroying punch. 😁

And thoroughly debunked it has been. Not sure why the need for them to insist otherwise.

Originally posted by TheHulkster
I quoted what was in the book. Show me where I said that "fake" means not existing. All of this is related to the universes instability.

You hold on to the notion of Superman destroying a multiverse with the force of his punch which is laughable to any readers who are not battle board obsessed Superman fanboys. You declare the issue's editor as being wrong.

He confirms that he is made of possibility. Of course it's comics. You can have solid beings in comics made of possibility, but the fact that he designates him as such shows that he is something unlike everyone else which in turn, means that his multiverse was unlike the real multiverse. It was too made of possibility.

Originally posted by TheHulkster
Oh, also, the editor said that the only stable world in WF's multiverse is the future JLA's world. Isn't Shane from that world?

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
There is also a scan which I posted WF stated his multiverse is very real. And also you're contradicting yourself

So you had said that Shayne was made of possibility which means he is unlike everyone else in the main multiverse(He and his world are not real/stable) . But later you said this

BTW, I also posted Snyder said Superman's hitting crashed the new multiverse(WF's multiverse) You know

You posted a scan of WF saying "even you, Diana, have never experienced truth as pure as this place", which is something very different. How is comparing purity to truth a declaration of stability?

The book says he is composed of possibility which is probably what that entire multiverse would have been composed of. The difference is that he and that JLA's world are stable and the rest is the multiverse isn't. That's why it "blinked out of existence".

And you posted a scan of Snyder clarifying which universe is destroyed, not how it is destroyed. When pressed on that, he said to ask the editors. The editor then clarifies how.

Originally posted by TheHulkster
You posted a scan of WF saying "even you, Diana, have never experienced truth as pure as this place", which is something very different. How is comparing purity to truth a declaration of stability?

The book says he is composed of possibility which is probably what that entire multiverse would have been composed of. The difference is that he and that JLA's world are stable and the rest is the multiverse isn't. That's why it "blinked out of existence".

And you posted a scan of Snyder clarifying which universe is destroyed, not how it is destroyed. When pressed on that, he said to ask the editors. The editor then clarifies how.

but the fact that he designates him as such shows that he is something unlike everyone else which in turn, means that his multiverse was unlike the real multiverse

Originally posted by JBL
Just like I lost my password, you Superman fans lost this debate. Get over it. Superman has other great and impressive feats that he actually did, so don't cry, Superman will be just fine without this debunked multiverse destroying punch. 😁

JBL the Great was so much cooler than you. Can you bring him back?

And BTW, WF will send those unstable universes to the forge is stated on panel. But we clearly see they aren't in the forge, Right?
https://ibb.co/j6QGcPv