Originally posted by ShadowFyre
God damn people is it that hard to read an op before commenting?I am still going with Vader despite Ashes equipment upgrade and here is why.
I don't know who here has ever had any experience or held and swung a 30lb sword or an extended amount of time. But you get tired quickly and a lightsaber is like what 2 or 3 lb you can literally twist it at the wrist and maneuver it is much more versatile ways than you could ever do a solid piece of metal. On top of that even the slightest touch buy a lightsaber would be far more damaging then the same amount of force applied with a metal blade.
Vader also has many more years of experience in combat and with swords/sabers. Also the opponents that Vader has fought or of a higher class then the deadites.
And I love me some ash William but I just not see him taking anything close to the majority here.
Swords are nowhere near 30lb.
All of them, every single one, even among the biggest ones that were ever reasonably used in battle weighed less then half that.
Hell, Grutte Pier, a man that was over 7'0 and 400lb, his sword which was 7ft, was only 14lb.
Ash's sword more then likely (keep in mind he was dual-wielding successfully for majority of the fight) weighed around 3lb. It's most likely an English Baron sword, which weighs 3 pounds 11 ounces.
Let's check theoretically would a saber should weigh, since we're using movie-only we'll have to rely on the prop itself's weight, as there are no on-screen statements for lightsaer weight:
https://www.inverse.com/article/37398-star-wars-the-last-jedi-lightsabers-rey-luke
According to Daisy Ridley it weighs around 3 kilos at the lowest, which is still 3 pounds heavier then Ash's sword would be.
I checked up over a bunch of websites and couldn't find an exact weight for Vader's saber but if Daisy's was 6lb, the lowest you could reasonably go for Vader's is 5lb but that'd be headcanon.
That's still heavier then Ash's sword no matter how you slice it.