Originally posted by Robtard
Let us just say Arbery has convictions. If he served his time, that's that. Having a criminal record does not mean you can get stalked and murdered by two armed private citizens playing out revenge fantasies.
Yeah, wondering why PVS wanted this "proof" so badly? I mean, why? What does it prove?
I asked him to explain how this supports my "case" but he refused to participate, honestly, and explain to me what it is exactly he thinks I'm trying to prove.
Here's my position which is unprovable at the moment due to a lack of evidence or jury result:
Originally posted by dadudemon
This is the correct take on the two key points of the case that does not confuse lawful pursuit with homicide:1. That Arbery legit was casing the joint (thus, constituting a first degree burgle which is a felony). This provides lawful pursuit of Arbery if the McMichael's can prove they had first hand knowledge of the felony.
2. Arbery approached the McMichael's on the road and immediately attacked McMichael senior.
If 1 is not true, it's the bare minimum of involuntary manslaughter.
If 1 and 2 cannot be proven, it is voluntary manslaughter.
If both can be proven, they will be acquitted.
Originally posted by Robtard
There's been a 3rd arrest: GA Authorities Arrest 3rd Man In Ahmaud Arbery KillingThe man who filmed video of the fatal shooting of Ahmaud Arbery in February has been arrested, the Georgia Bureau of Investigation said Thursday. William "Roddie" Bryan Jr. is charged with felony murder and criminal attempt to commit false imprisonment. -snip
Just saw this. Seems like this has not become a witch-hunt and it's quite inappropriate to be going after the guy who recorded the confrontation which was central to even getting the public outrage to happen to begin with.
He was polygraphed. Which is inadmissible.