The murder of Ahmaud Arbery/All three perpetrators found guilty

Originally posted by Surtur
I admit part of it is laziness, but another reason I don't attempt to go out of my way to give these people evidence is because I see how they treat you when you do. It doesn't matter what you show them. They don't care.

You could do detailed research or you could take a picture of a plate of wet noodles and the response would be the same.

It's not as though the evidence he is requested hasn't been posted multiple times in this very thread including one such item just today. It's disingenuous to ask "citation?"

There really is no point in re-pasting what he can look-up within less than 10 seconds on his own. I even hinted at a direct link to Georgia's court records will which show his charges and trial docs.

He simply refuses because it doesn't fit his narrative. It really is a waste of time to post links @ someone who will literally ignore them and play spin-doctor to avoid it.

I don't even know why he needs that "evidence" for me to prove whatever point he thinks I need to make. What point?

yikes. still flailing and raging? okay

DDM: *makes assertion of fact*

anyone: could I see evidence to back your claim?

DMM: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE *wall of deflective worthless text salad*

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
yikes. still flailing and raging? okay

Did Arbery have a criminal record yes or no?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
yikes. still flailing and raging? okay

DDM: *makes assertion of fact*

anyone: could I see evidence to back your claim?

DMM: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE *wall of worthless text salad*

Just so we're clear, your claim is that Arbery was never arrested or have a criminal record?

Originally posted by Surtur
Did Arbery have a criminal record yes or no?

the burden of proof is on the person who claims the existence of evidence, not the person who suspects lack of evidence. this is true in debates as well as u.s. law

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
the burden of proof is on the person who claims the existence of evidence, not the person who suspects lack of evidence. this is true in debates as well as u.s. law

But you haven't even given us anything as to why you suspect racism...

#deflection

Oh sorry did I bring up that thing which you can't prove? Lol.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
the burden of proof is on the person who claims the existence of evidence, not the person who suspects lack of evidence. this is true in debates as well as u.s. law

Which is why I'm asking if you're stating that Arbery doesn't have any kind of arrest/criminal record.

K, surt. I'll just repost this on every page since you seem to keep demanding that I answer your question that I already answered

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
the fact that they had zero probable case to chase him down, and dismissed the previous multiple white trespassers. that seems like racial bias to me

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
the burden of proof

Ahhh, this high school philosophy class tacitc.

The burden of proof is on anyone who wishes to make an assertion.

If your assertion is that you disbelieve or want evidence for a certain narrative, then you can find that information to support your position.

If your position is the positive assertion that Arbery has a clean record, then you can prove that he has a clean record just as easily as anyone who can repost his unclean record (which has been posted about and talked about for weeks, now).

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
this is true in debates as well as u.s. law

That's incorrect.

With databases, you make the same data queries that assert whatever position you're looking for, as well.

A null result is still a positive result which gets put into the report. If you wish to prove a null result, the burden of proof is on you to prove your null result or else your position logically works out as thus:

Me: 100 points
You: 0 points

100 - 0 = 100

I remain factually uncontested.

In actual philosophy and actual science, you can't play the high school debate class tactic of "ZOMG! Burden of proofs!" Nope, null assertion is still a testable hypothesis and constitutes a logical position.

And since I have already proven my position in this thread multiple times, even including on this very day, your trolling is inadequate and you lose the game you tried to play before you could even start playing it?

Why, because of this:

Originally posted by dadudemon
Wait for the evidence trolling. "Do you have a citation?"

Or, "citation needed"

That's what he used to do. citation-needed-trolling.

So, go-ahead, let's have the ask for a citation so we can get this out of the way.

I know you become more educated just by having these conversations with me. You're welcome for the tutelage and education - it's free while I watch videos.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Which is why I'm asking if you're stating that Arbery doesn't have any kind of arrest/criminal record.

asserting? nope. As I said several times, I'm open to any evidence

Originally posted by Silent Master
Which is why I'm asking if you're stating that Arbery doesn't have any kind of arrest/criminal record.

I sure hope he learns something about "burden of proof" assertions from my post. Surely he will realize his disbelief in the face of mountains of already posted evidence also requires his own evidence. 🙂

Let's wait and see for a miracle where he pends the 10 seconds it takes to find it himself or uses the court records database to query for his desired information.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
asserting? nope. As I said several times, I'm open to any evidence

Have you looked for the evidence?

the burden of proof is on the claimer of evidence, not the doubter.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
asserting? nope. As I said several times, I'm open to any evidence

Remember that one time I posted a series of credible links to four different assertions?

All 4 were directly proven in the multiple citations? And you still took the time to debate red herrings in the hopes that we'd forget about the assertions I was proving?

Do you wonder why no one thinks you're serious? Go ahead: use google. All of us have likely googled his criminal record in the 10 seconds it took to find results. You try it, now. Go on, git! Try it out! See watcha get! 🙂

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
the burden of proof is on the claimer of evidence, not the doubter.

Incorrect.

🙂

Originally posted by dadudemon
Ahhh, this high school philosophy class tacitc.

The burden of proof is on anyone who wishes to make an assertion.

If your assertion is that you disbelieve or want evidence for a certain narrative, then you can find that information to support your position.

If your position is the positive assertion that Arbery has a clean record, then you can prove that he has a clean record just as easily as anyone who can repost his unclean record (which has been posted about and talked about for weeks, now).

That's incorrect.

With databases, you make the same data queries that assert whatever position you're looking for, as well.

A null result is still a positive result which gets put into the report. If you wish to prove a null result, the burden of proof is on you to prove your null result or else your position logically works out as thus:

Me: 100 points
You: 0 points

100 - 0 = 100

I remain factually uncontested.

In actual philosophy and actual science, you can't play the high school debate class tactic of "ZOMG! Burden of proofs!" Nope, null assertion is still a testable hypothesis and constitutes a logical position.

And since I have already proven my position in this thread multiple times, even including on this very day, your trolling is inadequate and you lose the game you tried to play before you could even start playing it?

Why, because of this:

I know you become more educated just by having these conversations with me. You're welcome for the tutelage and education - it's free while I watch videos.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
the burden of proof is on the claimer of evidence, not the doubter.

^truth

this is why I also don't need to prove that god doesn't exist 👆

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
the burden of proof is on the claimer of evidence, not the doubter.

Lol it's also on the claimer of racism. And no, you won't hide behind it by saying it's just a suspicion.

Put up or shut up kiddo 🙂

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
the burden of proof is on the claimer of evidence, not the doubter.

That wasn't my question, forget about DDM. this has nothing to do with him. you claim that your open to new evidence. I'm asking if you've actually searched for any evidence.