Supreme and Gladiator vs. Superman

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
Hey, you deleleted one of my threads - as if Superman had zero chance in it - in the past.

It had Hype and Blue Marvel facing Supes, if memory serves. Or something similar, but definitely Supes facing his two "clones".

Now...? One could make a thread with Supes fighting against every Superman clone ever made, including Marvel, Image, DC itself and other companies....

... and you abhilegends would still argue how Kal "speedblitzes" and "one-shots".

--
But you were probably 😐'img about that part about keeping in touch with the writers, lol.

TBH my memory is shit, but also that I know even less about Supreme than any of the aforementioned characters.

I mean, he could be a solid herald, or he could get HV'd in the first two seconds and turn it in to just Superman v Gladiator.

KMC was different back then, that was my point.

But even without the boring zombie superman wankfest mode on, I believe it's not a spite to have him in a thread against any 2 ripoffs with nearly identical powers (unless it's someone like Sentry, who fluctuates from a low herald to trans on a daily basis).

Clark still has the enormous advantage of having more appearances and feats, so it's okay to put him in a gay threesome.

Kal speedblitzes and one-shots.

Stop drinking your own urine, masterbruce2.

Originally posted by -Pr-
TBH my memory is shit, but also that I know even less about Supreme than any of the aforementioned characters.

I mean, he could be a solid herald, or he could get HV'd in the first two seconds and turn it in to just Superman v Gladiator.

Kapren right now:

Originally posted by h1a8
It's funny how you didn't quote where I actually asked for the single feat. But quote me stating I was asking for "feats".

I asked for a single feat for strength or a single feat for combat speed.

So according to you, no one here should ever ask for feats? Yes or no?

Its because you never asked for a single feat. You asked for a strength feat or a speed feat. Which is it? Regardless, does one feat qualify you to debate in a thread?

If you dont know anything about the characters, stay the phuck out of the thread.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Or I can ask for feats in order to at least have a vague reference.

Maybe the problem is that you'd end up feeling too self-conscious after simply posting respect thread scans. 🙂

Is a vague reference good enough to debate a thread? Posting one feat is good enough for you huh?

Why should I post respect threads. If somebody or you is that interested, wouldnt you want to look up the character yourself to check out his or her feats? Obviously not. It took me 3 seconds to find a respect thread online. I guess thats to much work for you.

Originally posted by tkitna
Is a vague reference good enough to debate a thread? Posting one feat is good enough for you huh?

Why should I post respect threads. If somebody or you is that interested, wouldnt you want to look up the character yourself to check out his or her feats? Obviously not. It took me 3 seconds to find a respect thread online. I guess thats to much work for you.

Ok, so if one is interested in participating in a thread they should know both/all characters involved to the point feats should not even be asked... 😂

Glad or Supreme would give him a fight solo, both together would be overkill.

Originally posted by heru
Glad or Supreme would give him a fight solo, both together would be overkill.

👆 Superman would beat both individually 9 times out of 10. Together, it'd be too much.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes

Ok, so if one is interested in participating in a thread they should know both/all characters involved to the point feats should not even be asked... 😂

One should have general knowledge of the characters at least. Why would somebody be interested in a thread if they dont even know the characters? Whatever man, you and H1 can keep posting in threads in which you have no knowledge of the characters and the rest of us will continue to wade through your BS as usual.

Originally posted by tkitna
One should have general knowledge of the characters at least. Why would somebody be interested in a thread if they dont even know the characters? Whatever man, you and H1 can keep posting in threads in which you have no knowledge of the characters and the rest of us will continue to wade through your BS as usual.

Agreed!!!

Originally posted by meep-meep
👆 Superman would beat both individually 9 times out of 10. Together, it'd be too much.

Debatable if he could get the majority individually against either. I agree with the rest of your post.

Originally posted by tkitna
One should have general knowledge of the characters at least. Why would somebody be interested in a thread if they dont even know the characters? Whatever man, you and H1 can keep posting in threads in which you have no knowledge of the characters and the rest of us will continue to wade through your BS as usual.

Originally posted by carver9
Agreed!!!

I disagree Carv. Glads would initially give Superman a fight.. But he'd get put down just about every single time. Same with Supreme, but Imo Supreme was slightly better odds than Gladiator.

Originally posted by tkitna
One should have general knowledge of the characters at least. Why would somebody be interested in a thread if they dont even know the characters? Whatever man, you and H1 can keep posting in threads in which you have no knowledge of the characters and the rest of us will continue to wade through your BS as usual.

Originally posted by carver9
Debatable if he could get the majority individually against either. I agree with the rest of your post.

Originally posted by h1a8
If Superman is superior in every way relevant to a forum fight then how is it debatable whether he gets a majority on Gladiator?

This is why we have so many troll fests. His haters won't give him the majority over Gladiator. Sad

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
KMC was different back then, that was my point.

But even without the boring zombie superman wankfest mode on, I believe it's not a spite to have him in a thread against any 2 ripoffs with nearly identical powers (unless it's someone like Sentry, who fluctuates from a low herald to trans on a daily basis).

Clark still has the enormous advantage of having more appearances and feats, so it's okay to put him in a gay threesome.

Oh, okay, I see now.

NGL, I ****ing hate what DC has done with Superman the last year or two.

Originally posted by Galan007
Superman should beat Supreme one on one, but using HV would be a big mistake, as Supreme could likely absorb it.

See? This is the shit I need to know.

==

As for the old "Superman V Gladiator" thing, there are very few heralds right now that would even challenge Superman. Gladiator isn't one of them. Before the N52 Reboot, sure, you could have put up an argument for it, but Superman was still more likely to beat him than vice versa. He just has superior feats, both in quality and in quantity.

Now? Gladiator would get battered.