Captain America owns Trump!

Originally posted by Silent Master
Why did you lie about my logic?

i didn't lie. you made a claim, refused to back it up, and demanded that others prove it wrong.

i deliberately did the same thing, following your logic.

wank harder, s&m. you're almost there

#CantWait

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
What logic?

the situational variety

Originally posted by Surtur
Indeed, stay consistent bro.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
i didn't lie. you made a claim, refused to back it up, and demanded that others prove it wrong.

i deliberately did the same thing, following your logic.

wank harder, s&m. you're almost there

Your Surt example wasn't an example of my logic, so why lie?

Originally posted by Surtur
So you had no proof but skin color.

Lol. Can't wait to see it called out.

#Consistency

I used the same proof you did in calling them "hicks", yes. The optics**. So Why it is okay for you and not for me? Explain that one.

**But it was more than just the skin color on my end, it was the situation and location of two White men in the South seemingly stalking down a Black man in a truck and killing him without due process. Like in the days when lynching was a legal thing.

Originally posted by Robtard
I used the same proof you did in calling them "hicks", yes. The optics**. So Why it is okay for you and not for me? Explain that one.

**But it was more than just the skin color on my end, it was the situation and location of two White men in the South seemingly stalking down a Black man in a truck and killing him without due process. Like in the days when lynching was a legal thing.

So you have no valid evidence of racism.

Gotcha! I look forward to the unintelligent agreeing with you.

it was exactly an example of your argumentative logic

1-make empty claim

2-fail to back up that claim with evidence

3-demand that others prove your empty claim false, thus shrugging off your burden of proof

4-declare victory when nobody takes your anti-logic weaktroll bait

wank harder s&m. almost there

Originally posted by Robtard
I used the same proof you did in calling them "hicks", yes. The optics**. So Why it is okay for you and not for me? Explain that one.

**But it was more than just the skin color on my end, it was the situation and location of two White men in the South seemingly stalking down a Black man in a truck and killing him without due process. Like in the days when lynching was a legal thing.

Originally posted by Surtur
So you have no valid evidence of racism.

Gotcha! I look forward to the unintelligent agreeing with you.

I explained my reasoning. Repeat: Why is it okay for you to use these measure and not for me?

Originally posted by jaden_2.0

Originally posted by Robtard
I explained my reasoning. Repeat: Why is it okay for you to use these measure and not for me?

I didn't use the measure.

Son: you lost.

Originally posted by Surtur
I didn't use the measure.

Son: you lost.

Originally posted by Surtur
I didn't use the measure.

Son: you lost.

Sure you did, you saw two white men from GA in a tuck with guns and thought "they're hicks", without really knowing as fact. It was the optics that brought you to this conclusion. Stop lying for once.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
O.K. wat?

Rob lied, you being not very bright agreed. It's happened before and will happen again.

that damn hill is gonna give poor surt a heart attack

Originally posted by Robtard
Sure you did, you saw two white men from GA in a tuck with guns and thought "they're hicks", without really knowing as fact. It was the optics that brought you to this conclusion. Stop lying for once.

Concession accepted. Moving on.

No, you made a claim and then said that by my logic, I had to disprove your claim or else you win.

I never said that if someone doesn't disprove my statement, then I win. thus your example wasn't an accurate depiction of my logic, So why did you lie?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
that damn hill is gonna give poor surt a heart attack