Originally posted by Bashar Teg
lol what a coward. can't even admit an error.and now we know how you/surt would/did react to indisputable proof that you made an error
^Same person who was gonna go run to reddit to get backup cuz he can't argue for himself.
I did laugh.
Hey bash, why not go summon them now? See if they agree 🙂
Originally posted by Surtur
Yikes. Okay can someone send out an SOS to Whirly to come help this guy out?Surely someone can help. Who wants to be disingenuous and agree with Bashes points? I'll let you, just to help him. I'm such a god damn awesome person I will allow it.
Remember that one time I proved PVS was a moron by posting a link he didn't even look at when he said this?
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
okay, so you have no proof that it was up for even one full day...
Whew...up for over 48 hours before "Mr. Burn it all down" decided to delete his tweet.
If only Twitter would fairly enforce their policies.
Originally posted by dadudemon
3Wrong. He posted it on the 28th. He didn't delete it until today.
It was up for 3 days.
Edit - 2 days. He posted it at 11:28PM on the 28th.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
your own link, yes?
http://archive.is/QxXjHcurrent time: 31 May 2020 21:00:00 UTC
Saved from: 31 May 2020 17:21:19 UTC
[b]Original: 30 May 2020 12:38:44 UTCso it was up for 1 day and 5 hours. not as you claim.
just admit you made a mistake. go on, you can do it. i believe in you 👆 [/B]
^^indisputable evidence provided of ddm's error, and it was ignored, and i was put on ignore
everyone paying attention?
EL OH EL
Originally posted by dadudemon
I've decided to ignore him. He's too stupid to be worth engaging. He's not joined a special group of truly dumb people.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
^^indisputable evidence provided of ddm's error, and it was ignored, and i was put on ignoreeveryone paying attention?
EL OH EL
Summon your reddit warriors. Anyone sad enough to come here cuz of shit you say will be easy pickings, I'd love to slap a few down.
Go for it 🙂
Originally posted by Surtur
You didn't even answer.What would you say if twitter was shown to be bias against conservatives?
that's a loaded question so i'll answer the relevant part:
if twitter was proven to allow non-conservatives to encourage arson and murder, i would raise both eyebrows and even evolve to grow a third eyebrow just so i could raise that one as well.
however i do not expect twitter to swoop in the moment it's posted or even the day it's posted.
what you have to understand is that the more followers a twitter user has, the quicker the offending tweet will be reported. so lets say i made a twitter account and openly encouraged some violent shit, on my own feed, and it was left up for a month. that really wouldn't prove anything since i wouldn't have many followers to get offended and report me
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
that's a loaded question so i'll answer the relevant part:if twitter was proven to allow non-conservatives to encourage arson and murder, i would raise both eyebrows and even evolve to grow a third eyebrow just so i could raise that one as well.
however i do not expect twitter to swoop in the moment it's posted or even the day it's posted.
what you have to understand is that the more followers a twitter user has, the quicker the offending tweet will be reported. so lets say i made a twitter account and openly encouraged some violent shit, on my own feed, and it was left up for a month. that really wouldn't prove anything since i wouldn't have many followers to get offended and report me
Can't wait for whirly to pretend a valid point was made.
But I will say the guy has over 100k followers and it's hard to believe he wasn't reported.
So nope, we can apply your logic to randos with hundreds of followers, not ones with over 100k
But all you'd do if bias was proven is raise an eyebrow? Yeah, sounds about right.
Leftists Defend ANTIFA After Trump Vows To Declare It A Terrorist Organization
Me>>>>>>>>every single person who defends Antifa
Originally posted by Surtur
Summon your reddit warriors. Anyone sad enough to come here cuz of shit you say will be easy pickings, I'd love to slap a few down.Go for it 🙂
Don't fall for his gaslighting and lies. Here, I fixed PVS' liar post:
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
Original tweet made 9:28PM PST 28 May 2020Date and Time Stamp of the first archive snapshat of the tweet: 30 May 2020 12:38:44 UTC
Don't worry, SportingNews and Yahoo also said he had the tweet up for a "few days" and that he made the tweet Thursday night.
And Archive .org shows that the tweet last existed 31 May 2020 20:05:58 UTC.
So how long was that tweet up?
PST to UTC: +7 hours.
https://savvytime.com/converter/pst-to-utc
Original Tweet timestamp in PST: 9:28 PM 5/28/2020.
That's 4:28 am 5/29/2020 UTC.
31/May/2020 20:05 UTC - 29/May/2020 04:28 UTC = 63Hours:23Minutes
And that's not taking into account how often the Archive website archives content. But based on the Yahoo article which was about 2 hours ago, he likely deleted it very shortly after that last snapshot. 🙂
Here's the history of when Archive took snapshots:
Do not fall for PVS' gaslighting where he pretends the archive snapshot timestamp is the actual tweet time.
Riddle me this: if these all are just white supremacists and russians why help them?
Joe Biden Campaign Staffers Donate To Group That Pays Bail In Riot-Torn Minneapolis, Report Says
lol
Originally posted by Surtur
Can't wait for whirly to pretend a valid point was made.But I will say the guy has over 100k followers and it's hard to believe he wasn't reported.
So nope, we can apply your logic to randos with hundreds of followers, not ones with over 100k
But all you'd do if bias was proven is raise an eyebrow? Yeah, sounds about right.
if you can prove that twitter saw it and allowed it to stay up.
Originally posted by Surtur
Can't wait for whirly to pretend a valid point was made.But I will say the guy has over 100k followers and it's hard to believe he wasn't reported.
So nope, we can apply your logic to randos with hundreds of followers, not ones with over 100k
But all you'd do if bias was proven is raise an eyebrow? Yeah, sounds about right.
I'd really like to know why people like PVS deny people with over 100K followers are breaking Twitter's terms of service but not getting their content censored or removed.
It's as if Twitter has unfair enforcement of their own rules.
This is why Twitter has lost their section 230 immunity.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Don't fall for his gaslighting and lies. Here, I fixed PVS' liar post:Don't worry, SportingNews and Yahoo also said he had the tweet up for a "few days" and that he made the tweet Thursday night.
And Archive .org shows that the tweet last existed 31 May 2020 20:05:58 UTC.
So how long was that tweet up?
PST to UTC: +7 hours.
https://savvytime.com/converter/pst-to-utc
Original Tweet timestamp in PST: 9:28 PM 5/28/2020.
That's 4:28 am 5/29/2020 UTC.
31/May/2020 20:05 UTC - 29/May/2020 04:28 UTC = [b]63Hours:23Minutes
And that's not taking into account how often the Archive website archives content. But based on the Yahoo article which was about 2 hours ago, he likely deleted it very shortly after that last snapshot. 🙂
Here's the history of when Archive took snapshots:
Do not fall for PVS' gaslighting where he pretends the archive snapshot timestamp is the actual tweet time. [/B]
Don't worry, nobody is dumb enough to believe PVS in the face of all this proof.