Originally posted by cdtm
Yeah, I was thinking about the "platform vs publisher" angle, and whether they're opening themselves up to a duty they can't possibly meet.Put another way, were they in danger of being held liable for Trumps tweets? If the answer is "No", then if your butt is already covered by doing nothing, the last thing you want to do is take an action that upsets the apple cart.
That's the correct approach. YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, etc.
They need to keep their section 230 immunity. Multiple cases exist, now, related to the YouTube censorship...so this mess was only a matter of time.