Twitter hides Trump Tweet for glorifying violence!

Started by Old Man Whirly!15 pages

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
looting ≠ rioting.

all the looting I've seen on video is basically people walking into a store, taking what they want, and walking out. just looks like they're having a leisurely day of sunday shopping, except when they stroll about they're surrounded by smoke, ash, and rubble from rioters being rioters. do some rioters take a break for some looting and vice versa? maybe. f*ck if I know.

when we had the under class broken by Cameron, the Police simply identified people off CCTV after the rioting and gave disproportionate sentences.

The White House calls out Twitter for 'censoring' Trump tweet and then admitting the text broke no rules

"The White House tweeted, "Twitter, in an email to the White House moments ago, admitted that the very tweet they are censoring does not violate any Twitter rules. So why are they still censoring it?"

The tweet included an image of the email, which confirmed in its conclusion: "We have investigated the reported content and could not identify any violations of the Twitter Rules...accordingly, we have not taken any action at this time."

Intriguing.

the blaze has zero credibility, so didn't read 👇

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
the blaze has zero credibility, so didn't read 👇
Thought it was from Stormfront, my bad!

Ah deflection noted.

sorry nobody cares about your zero-credibility activist newsblog links

Sorry those facts killed your narrative.

sure they're "facts", surt...in your mind

Your cheerleader will be here shortly 🙂

and now the victim-card derailment. meanwhile you're already at defcon 3 and you only just woke up, already blowing your rape whistle and howling for daddy in another thread. grow up ronnie

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
and now the victim-card derailment. meanwhile you're already at defcon 3 and you only just woke up, already blowing your rape whistle and howling for daddy in another thread. grow up ronnie
surt never puts the victim card away, he has it lamenated and wears it like a security pass in his top pocket.

Yikes, this is some yuge hypocrisy here.

Yeah, he treated this situation very differently than the infamous "very good people on both sides" situation from the beginning of his presidency and the protests from just last month against covid restrictions.

This is a pretty stark,damning comparison to me:

Originally posted by truejedi
Yeah, he treated this situation very differently than the infamous "very good people on both sides" situation from the beginning of his presidency and the protests from just last month against covid restrictions.

This is a pretty stark,damning comparison to me:

Is he referring to the armed lockdown protesters who didn't burn or attack or destroy anything?

^^typical closet fascist trying to paint all the protesters as rioters. gets offended when you call him a closet fascist because he's also very sensitive

^Has no idea what the word fascist means, continues to embarrass himself and use it incorrectly anyways

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
^^typical closet fascist trying to paint all the protesters as rioters. gets offended when you call him a closet fascist because he's also very sensitive
👆 Bingo!

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
texas is f*cked, innit

irrelevant to what trump said:

"when the looting starts, the shooting starts"

DDM and I are having a different conversation, try and keep up

still butthurt because you lost the debate? there there

Originally posted by Surtur
Is he referring to the armed lockdown protesters who didn't burn or attack or destroy anything?

Were those protestors attacked with tear gas? Hard to say what they would have burned or attacked if they had been.

Didn't one of the "good people on both sides" drive a car into a group of protestors? Wouldn't that be considered an attack?