Twitter hides Trump Tweet for glorifying violence!

Started by Bashar Teg15 pages
Originally posted by Surtur
Explain how it isn't cheerleading.

because it was an excellent pun. if ddm said it I would also have been forced to laugh out loud. maybe you don't find it funny because you're upset and your back hurts

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
s&m is gonna try as hard as he can, though

Trumpers gonna be Trumpy. Par for the course.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
because it was an excellent pun. if ddm said it I would also have been forced to laugh out loud. maybe you don't find it funny because you're upset and your back hurts

So it's cheerleading you just lack the balls to call it that. Gotcha. A loser will be along shortly to agree with you.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Where does he say Police or Military?

it was implied in his tweet. Re: sending national guard in to murder looters. your silly games are so infantile, s&m.

Originally posted by Surtur
So it's cheerleading you just lack the balls to call it that. Gotcha. A loser will be along shortly to agree with you.

I see you've hit defcon 3. I guess you will once again try to manipulate the mods into banning people very shortly.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
it was implied in his tweet. Re: sending national guard in to murder looters. your silly games are so infantile, s&m.

TBF, SilentMaster might not be aware that the National Guard is part of the US military, a facet of the US Army and US Air Force.

So Trump just threatened to use the US military to murder Americans on American soil. He really wants to be like China.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
I see you've hit defcon 3. I guess you will once again try to manipulate the mods into banning people very shortly.

Nah, mod already admitted he shouldn't have done what he did. That concession has been accepted.

But you tried 🙂

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
it was implied in his tweet. Re: sending national guard in to murder looters. your silly games are so infantile, s&m.

So, he never said it and you're just making things up.

Thank you for admitting I was right.

Originally posted by Robtard
TBF, SilentMaster might not be aware that the National Guard is part of the US military, a facet of the US Army and US Air Force.

So Trump just threatened to use the US military to murder Americans on American soil. He really wants to be like China.

but I though he is was in the armed forces...that should be common knowledge to him, along with "discharging firearm at a person= intended lethal force". I have questions now

Originally posted by Silent Master
So, he never said it and you're just making things up.

Thank you for admitting I was right.

nope, that's just your defense mechanisms springing up because you know you've been proven flat wrong.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
nope, that's just your defense mechanisms springing up because you know you've been proven flat wrong.

Really, then please point out where he actually said to murder looters or that "if the looting starts the shooting starts" was referring to the police, rather than people trying to protect themselves from the violence.

"if the looting starts the shooting starts" was a complete sentence and a clearly implied threat of lethal force at the mere sign of looting,
unconditional to any added circumstances, which is illegal. -fact

he commands the armed forces, so how was the national guard not supposed to interpret that as informal marching orders?

maybe you should just go for the trusty old "he was being sarcastic" defense, because there is no way to spin his statement to mean anything other than an incitement for murder

Ok, now point out where he actually said to murder looters or that "if the looting starts the shooting starts" was referring to the police, rather than people trying to protect themselves from the violence.

I'm not asking for what you think he meant.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
"if the looting starts the shooting starts" was a complete sentence and a clearly implied threat of lethal force at the mere sign of looting,
unconditional to any added circumstances, which is illegal. -fact

he commands the armed forces, so how was the national guard not supposed to interpret that as informal marching orders?

maybe you should just go for the trusty old "he was being sarcastic" defense, because there is no way to spin his statement to mean anything other than an incitement for murder

Trump is using the "I wasn't serious!" defense after even military people went "WTF did he just say!?".

-Trump later clarified his tweets by adding that it was merely an "expression" that was "spoken as a fact, not as a statement." -Snip

Originally posted by Robtard
Trump is using the "I wasn't serious!" defense after even military people went "WTF did he just say!?".

-Trump later clarified his tweets by adding that it was merely an "expression" that was "spoken as a fact, not as a statement." -Snip

Is that defense not valid? Say it 🙂

now you're backpedaling to previous failed spin attempts. he made a general statement that shooting will start as a response to looting, in the same tweet in which he announced that he's sending in the national guard. the implied threat to have looters shot just for looting is clear, and that would be murder. Since inciting murder is illegal, trump already broke the law without a shot fired

what a surprise, s&m arguing in bad faith and time-wasting

Originally posted by Robtard
Trump is using the "I wasn't serious!" defense after even military people went "WTF did he just say!?".

-Trump later clarified his tweets by adding that it was merely an "expression" that was "spoken as a fact, not as a statement." -Snip

will that work? making a terroristic threat on american citizens and later following up with "just kidding"?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
now you're backpedaling to previous failed spin attempts. he made a general statement that shooting will start as a response to looting, in the same tweet in which he announced that he's sending in the national guard. the implied threat to have looters shot just for looting is clear, and that would be murder. Since inciting murder is illegal, trump already broke the law without a shot fired

what a surprise, s&m arguing in bad faith and time-wasting

So you admit that he never said that he would order the police or military to murder people just for looting like you claimed.

Thanks for admitting you were wrong.

Originally posted by Silent Master
So you admit that he never said that he would order the police or military to murder people just for looting like you claimed.

Thanks for admitting you were wrong.

nope. that is just more of your juvenile defense mechanisms springing up because you were proven flat wrong.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
nope. that is just more of your juvenile defense mechanisms springing up because you were proven flat wrong.

So, you're sticking to your claim that he said that he would order the police or military to murder people just for looting?