Originally posted by Silent Master
I'll take that as an admission.
Yeah the guy who wants to brand anti-fascists (but not actual fascists) as terrorists is clearly not the racist here.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Could be a mixed bag: maybe some cities have ratios different than others.
Point stands. Peeps wanna brand black protestors and those who stand with them (which apparently only lefties do), as terrorists.
But not the cops who kill black people. Or the fascists, or White supremacists.
And then this would give the Army/police free reign to shoot down protestors.
Anyone who doesnt see a) the double standards against coloured people OR b) the moral ambiguity of throwing the word terrorist around like that...
really needs their head examined.
Originally posted by Silent Master
I want to label terrorists as terrorists.
I want to terrorize the Antifa terrorists by running up to them, dressed like a Boomer, with student loan past-due bills for degrees that are not relevant to earning money, memes that tell them they need to take responsibility for their actions and choices, and research that shows extreme forms of "protest" actually makes people not want to support the cause.
Originally posted by Silent Master
They are terrorists, so what's the problem with calling them what they are?
I think I understand the rules.
Those on the left shouldn't be called terrorists.
Islamic terrorists shouldn't be called Islamic terrorists either.
It's just the white supremacists who should be deemed terrorists.
Originally posted by Surtur
I think I understand the rules.Those on the left shouldn't be called terrorists.
Islamic terrorists shouldn't be called Islamic terrorists either.
It's just the white supremacists who should be deemed terrorists.
Pretty much, yeah.... special rules for those on the left vs those on the right. 👆
Originally posted by Darth Thor
Oh so this ones great.Donald Rumsfeld back in 2003 regarding Looting in Iraq:
While no one condones looting, on the other hand, one can understand the pent up feelings that may result from decades of repression and people who have had members of their family killed by that regime, for them to be taking their feelings out on that regime.
And I dont think theres anyone in any of those pictures.... (who wouldnt) accept it as part of the price of getting from a repressed regime to freedom.
^ Sounds like a lefty apologist for terrorism.
Nice find 👆
Originally posted by Surtur
Just be honest nobody here who objects to the rioters being called terrorists and who tried to defend Obama not calling out the islamic radical terrorists as islamic radical terrorists would have a problem calling white supremacists terrorists.
No I wouldnt.
Rioters are not Terrorists. They are violent protestors.
No one objects to calling a terrorist who is Muslim a plain Terrorist. Obama was simply appealing not to use the Islamic pre-fix just like even Trump wouldnt argue calling Antifa- Black terrorists. Its just a courteous thing to not provoke an entire race or religion through provocative language which doesnt even bother terrorists in the slightest.
Theres just no way to spin White Supremacy though lol. You can have peaceful protestors and peaceful Muslims, but a White Supremacist is by definition a f***ing racist lmao. Why youd want to defend them is beyond me.
So no if youre trying to point out hypocrisy or double standards this is not the area to focus on.
To answer the thread. Because the KKK largely voted for Trump in 2016; Trump needs those votes again for 2020.
Only people violent here are the PoPo
Originally posted by Robtard
To answer the thread. Because the KKK largely voted for Trump in 2016; Trump needs those votes again for 2020.
And of course you have actual proof that they mostly voted from Trump, don't you? Sure, of course you do robbie. 🙄
Originally posted by Darth Thor
No I wouldnt.Rioters are not Terrorists. They are violent protestors.
No one objects to calling a terrorist who is Muslim a plain Terrorist. Obama was simply appealing not to use the Islamic pre-fix just like even Trump wouldnt argue calling Antifa- Black terrorists. Its just a courteous thing to not provoke an entire race or religion through provocative language which doesnt even bother terrorists in the slightest.
Theres just no way to spin White Supremacy though lol. You can have peaceful protestors and peaceful Muslims, but a White Supremacist is by definition a f***ing racist lmao. Why youd want to defend them is beyond me.
So no if youre trying to point out hypocrisy or double standards this is not the area to focus on.
I just don't believe you, sorry.
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
And of course you have actual proof that they mostly voted from Trump, don't you? Sure, of course you do robbie. 🙄
HYG, sport:
"This represents a turning point for the people of this country. We are determined to take our country back, we're going to fulfill the promises of Donald Trump, and that's what we believed in, that's why we voted for Donald Trump, because he said he's going to take our country back and that's what we gotta do." -David Duke 2017
Originally posted by Robtard#Gottem
HYG, sport:"This represents a turning point for the people of this country. We are determined to take our country back, we're going to fulfill the promises of Donald Trump, and that's what we believed in, that's why we voted for Donald Trump, because he said he's going to take our country back and that's what we gotta do." -David Duke 2017