Trump in Epsteins "little black book" say anonymous.

Started by Bashar Teg10 pages
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!

inb4 "ahhhh but what about every other single municipality/state in the country? blah blah [word salad] i win"

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!

Originally posted by dadudemon
"Patrol guide"

So not codified laws for NYC?

So it is not illegal, but the PD's policy?

I appreciate you doing PVS' research for him and proving him wrong.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
inb4 "ahhhh but what about every other single municipality/state in the country? blah blah [word salad] i win"

That's correct. Because you know it's not true except for very few specific places.

👆

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
No of coarse not, the fact you believe it is honestly sick. Are you just gaslighting here and bored?
so you think it can just be dismissed. Do you really believe Trump is above the law.

New York "Right to Know Act". look it up. police trying to hide their identity is a violation of the law.

any more gaslighting stunts, ddm?

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
so you think it can just be dismissed. Do you really believe Trump is above the law.

Fact check: if its a real case then it will be brought forward.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Fact check: if its a real case then it will be brought forward.
👆 unless something happens like the last time.

If yo watched the documentary he wrote a will a day or two before he killed himself which puts the whole idea of “he was murdered” in serious doubt

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
If yo watched the documentary he wrote a will a day or two before he killed himself which puts the whole idea of “he was murdered” in serious doubt
haven't watched it yet, but that's not what I mean. You know the cases that were going forward (perhaps) but were dropped by the accuser, despite evidence (if real) like that posted on line. We will see...

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
New York "Right to Know Act". look it up. police trying to hide their identity is a violation of the law.

any more gaslighting stunts, ddm?

Yeah, what you said is not in the Right to Know Act:

https://www.changethenypd.org/RightToKnowAct

NYPD ID law that was passed has major loopholes but requires that in certain situations officers should:

Tell you their name, rank, command and the reason they are interrupting your day.
At the end of those interactions, if they have not given you a summons or arrested you, they should give you a business card that has their name, rank, and badge number, and their command.

Here is your claim:

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
meanwhile, it's illegal for a police to hide their badge number. simple indisputable fact

I cannot substantiate this claim and, so far, no one else has, either.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Fact check: from lawyers.

Fact check: Semantics

All this simply because I wanted you to talk more about your thoughts about the NYPD's motivations for hiding their badge #.

If you weren't so combative and contrarian (and calling literally everything, even things that agree with you, "gaslighting"😉, you could have just talked more about your thoughts, with supporting evidence, for what is motivating the police to where those "support" badge things. Then we could have had a nice normal adult discussion about conspiracy, corruption, and facial recognition.

Originally posted by dadudemon
"Patrol guide"

So not codified laws for NYC?

So it is not illegal, but the PD's policy?

I appreciate you doing PVS' research for him and proving him wrong.

Re: Trump in Epsteins "little black book" say anonymous.

dur

thanks for bumping your shitpost hugbox threads off the front page 👆