Trump in Epsteins "little black book" say anonymous.

Started by Robtard10 pages
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
One day I hope he acknowledges all the 7.5 million people as people.
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
One day I hope he acknowledges all the 7.5 million people as people.

Surtur will acknowledge the 7.5 thousand people only after these short messages by our Chicken Pot Pie Sponsor: Stouffers.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
One day I hope he acknowledges all the 7.5 million people as people.

As long as the 7.5 billion ppl don't include corporations anymore 😉

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
It would be the end of America, but if your going to give credit to this, then you have to say Clinton raped young boys as well. I doubt your willing to do that. I don’t even think that

How would it be the end of America?

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
According to the leaks, he raped multiple children, both boys and girls. The Q-Tards are probably melting down right now.

I missed this. Wow.

anyone see the nypd are sporting "mourning badges?" just happens to cover up their badge number. had a giggle until I realized it's for real

https://twitter.com/NYPDShea/status/1250894546982055938

and here are the "mourning" police consoling fellow mourners

https://thenypost.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/nypd-protest-maks18.jpg

number appears to show in that shot, but how easy is to slide that shit down an inch? ever hear of armbands?

whoops wrong thread. eh f*ck it I'm leaving it here too

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
anyone see the nypd are sporting "mourning badges?" just happens to cover up their badge number. had a giggle until I realized it's for real

https://twitter.com/NYPDShea/status/1250894546982055938

and here are the "mourning" police consoling fellow mourners

https://thenypost.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/nypd-protest-maks18.jpg

number appears to show in that shot, but how easy is to slide that shit down an inch? ever hear of armbands?

Do you think that's legit an oversight or is it an actual conspiracy to hide who they are so they can abuse people?

I think if this was the 90s, before facial recognition and "everything being on the internet", it would 100% definitely be a trick. But it is 2020 and cops are getting doxxed very quickly during these clashes. So I suspect the legitimacy of calling this a conspiracy of trying to anonymize themselves.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Do you think that's legit an oversight or is it an actual conspiracy to hide who they are so they can abuse people?

I think if this was the 90s, before facial recognition and "everything being on the internet", it would 100% definitely be a trick. But it is 2020 and cops are getting doxxed very quickly during these clashes. So I suspect the legitimacy of calling this a conspiracy of trying to anonymize themselves.

Fact check: Trumpers double down.

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/06/03/joe-biden-trump-poll-monmouth-298470

Originally posted by dadudemon
Do you think that's legit an oversight or is it an actual conspiracy to hide who they are so they can abuse people?

I think if this was the 90s, before facial recognition and "everything being on the internet", it would 100% definitely be a trick. But it is 2020 and cops are getting doxxed very quickly during these clashes. So I suspect the legitimacy of calling this a conspiracy of trying to anonymize themselves.

meanwhile, it's illegal for a police to hide their badge number. simple indisputable fact

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
meanwhile, it's illegal for a police to hide their badge number. simple indisputable fact
Fact check: correct 👆

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
meanwhile, it's illegal for a police to hide their badge number. simple indisputable fact

Which laws/statutes is this in? I do know that when asked, they must provide their name and badge number. But I cannot find laws that states it is illegal to cover their badge number.

Regardless, you've not responded appropriately to my post.

Do you think that's legit an oversight or is it an actual conspiracy to hide who they are so they can abuse people?

Meaning, this was an honest mistake or are they trying to hide who they are so they can commit abuses against the people?

Originally posted by dadudemon
Which laws/statutes is this in? I do know that when asked, they must provide their name and badge number. But I cannot find laws that states it is illegal to cover their badge number.

Regardless, you've not responded appropriately to my post.

Do you think that's legit an oversight or is it an actual conspiracy to hide who they are so they can abuse people?

Meaning, this was an honest mistake or are they trying to hide who they are so they can commit abuses against the people?

Fact check: word salad

easily dismissible gaslighting aside:

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
meanwhile, it's illegal for a police to hide their badge number. simple indisputable fact

RE: the law + the whole point of cops having badge numbers in the first place

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
easily dismissible gaslighting aside:

RE: the law + the whole point of cops having badge numbers in the first place

Which laws/statutes is this in? I do know that when asked, they must provide their name and badge number. But I cannot find laws that states it is illegal to cover their badge number.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
meanwhile, it's illegal for a police to hide their badge number. simple indisputable fact

Originally posted by dadudemon
Which laws/statutes is this in? I do know that when asked, they must provide their name and badge number. But I cannot find laws that states it is illegal to cover their badge number.
Fact check: from lawyers.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg

And yet, I'm disputing this claim and I cannot find results.

I did the research and your point is just not showing up in results.

Gaslighting, etc.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Fact check: from lawyers.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Fact check: from lawyers.

"Patrol guide"

So not codified laws for NYC?

So it is not illegal, but the PD's policy?

I appreciate you doing PVS' research for him and proving him wrong.