Florida Sheriff tells residents to shoot looters that enter their home

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
fact check: murder is murder, not all homicides are murder. Reading age low?

Glad you agree with me:

Originally posted by dadudemon
Not all homicides are murders.

But you might want to yell at this guy for disagreeing with you:

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
... murder is often murder.

Originally posted by cdtm
Not at all.

But your case is also a hypothetical. I'm saying murder is pretty hard to prove, and I'm not certain the bar of proof is any higher then "He broke into my home, I feared for my life, I reacted in a panic."

What judge will go over that with a fine tooth comb? If it was me, I'd probably kill someone, not out of a desire to murder, but out of a genuine fear that I don't know what this guy wants with me and assume the worst.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Fact check: I have no case hypotheticals are always hypothetical, wanting to murder is wanting to murder, murder is murder not all homicides are murder

No argument there.

There's a pretty obvious difference between chasing someone down as he flees from your home, and shooting a guy you find in your home in low light because for all you know, he's there to murder you, rape your wife and kids, tie them up, and burn the house down.

That second one isn't hypothetical btw, it happened. Petit case, very tragic, a doctor was the only survivor.

But yes, I agree murder is murder.

Originally posted by cdtm
No argument there.

There's a pretty obvious difference between chasing someone down as he flees from your home, and shooting a guy you find in your home in low light because for all you know, he's there to murder you, rape your wife and kids, tie them up, and burn the house down.

That second one isn't hypothetical btw, it happened. Petit case, very tragic, a doctor was the only survivor.

But yes, I agree murder is murder.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
The comments are great

They're going to be in their homes tonight with their guns loaded, and if you try to break into their homes to steal, to set fires, I'm highly recommending they blow you back out of the house with their guns,"

Awesome. That is the way it should be. I haven't read the rest of comments in this thread yet but no doubt there's some little crybaby b*tch ass leftists who have a problem with it.

That sheriff should be strongly praised.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Awesome. That is the way it should be. I haven't read the rest of comments in this thread yet but no doubt there's some little crybaby b*tch ass leftists who have a problem with it.

That sheriff should be strongly praised.

Some heavy duty coping is already going on. It's spectacular:

Originally posted by juggerman
Is self defense murder now?

It always has been to dipshit leftists like pooty and bash.

Fact check: Dross

Originally posted by Surtur
Some heavy duty coping is already going on. It's spectacular:

LoL. Yep, already preparing people to accept that lie when it happens. Typical leftists.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
If someone breaks into your house the law says you have the right to defend yourself

It's truly quite sad that this has to be explained to grown ass men.

Originally posted by carthage
In defense of self hardly, and its perfectly legal in AZ providing I'm defending myself, another person, or in my home. It must suck to be useless and unable to defend yourself from criminals

Yet, but that's the shitty UK for you lol.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Yet, but that's the shitty UK for you lol.

*Yep*, not "yet."

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
LoL. Yep, already preparing people to accept that lie when it happens. Typical leftists.

What's pathetic is the people who buy into the "this will be racisms fault" nonsense.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
The comments are great

They're going to be in their homes tonight with their guns loaded, and if you try to break into their homes to steal, to set fires, I'm highly recommending they blow you back out of the house with their guns,"

@Surtur: surely there won't be people stupid enough to fall for that, right? LOL.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
@Surtur: surely there won't be people stupid enough to fall for that, right? LOL.

The truth is the protesters will be to blame if there is a spike.

Not that I want a spike, because if there is no spike it proves all this social distancing stuff was bullshit.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Fact check: sort of It is important to understand the Castle Doctrine does not give the accused a license to kill or an absolute right to use deadly force. The law simply gives the accused the benefit of the doubt of using self-defense because people should feel safest in their homes and have a right to protect themselves and their families. The benefit of the doubt, however, can be taken away by the government when it can prove it is more likely than not the claimed self-defense was not justified.

Fact check: this is inaccurate

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
yes. you have the right to defend your person with lethal force. this does not apply to "defending" your possessions

You’re a moron.

Ask yourself this
-Are your possessions yours?
-Did you buy them, inherit them, given them?
-If any of your possessions were to break while a looter enters your home, do have to pay to fix them?

Again, you’re an idiotic moron for staying such a thing. Not even a retarded child would say such stupid things.

Originally posted by SquallX
You’re a moron.

Ask yourself this
-Are your possessions yours?
-Did you buy them, inherit them, given them?
-If any of your possessions were to break while a looter enters your home, do have to pay to fix them?

Again, you’re an idiotic moron for staying such a thing. Not even a retarded child would say such stupid things.

your fact-free autistic screeching has been noted 👆

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
your fact-free autistic screeching has been noted 👆

If someone owns a home you are saying they can't use lethal force to protect it?