would a "WHITE lives matter" movement be considered racist?

Started by eThneoLgrRnae7 pages

I posted about that recently. Remember it well. He was run over by a car and then hacked to death with a machete in front of about a dozen witnesses who were just standing around watching.

It's why I couldn't help but laugh when Darth Thor said if what happened to George Floyd had happened in the UK that people wouldn't have just stood by watching.

Never learned what happened to the murdering bastard. I assume he was put in prison for life, yes?

I think WLM is Fox News.

Three white men and a white woman commenting on a black protest right now.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
I posted about that recently. Remember it well. He was run over by a car and then hacked to death with a machete in front of about a dozen witnesses who were just standing around watching.

It's why I couldn't help but laugh when Darth Thor said if what happened to George Floyd had happened in the UK that people wouldn't have just stood by watching.

Never learned what happened to the murdering bastard. I assume he was put in prison for life, yes?

yeah he went to prison, but in prison he got all his teeth smashed out of his head...then got awarded compensation ffs.

Originally posted by Insane Titan
yeah he went to prison, but in prison he got all his teeth smashed out of his head...then got awarded compensation ffs.

And this is why I say nuke the goddamned lawyers.

It's all their fault. Lawyers, judges, an entire generation that discovered law can be perverted to get money instead of enforce justice.

Originally posted by cdtm
And this is why I say nuke the goddamned lawyers.

It's all their fault. Lawyers, judges, an entire generation that discovered law can be perverted to get money instead of enforce justice.

Oh man, let that hate flow like a bad rhyme in a white rappers arsenal.

I wonder how many of our representatives are/were trained as lawyers? It's one of the few professions that can create more work for itself, simple example.

If you hire someone to dig a ditch when it's done the job is complete. When you hire a lawyer they simply interpret so they can always find more words to spin, as a matter of fact they are actually allowed to create more words to spin. It's a pretty nefarious profession with awesome grammatical skills.

Originally posted by snowdragon
Oh man, let that hate flow like a bad rhyme in a white rappers arsenal.

I wonder how many of our representatives are/were trained as lawyers? It's one of the few professions that can create more work for itself, simple example.

If you hire someone to dig a ditch when it's done the job is complete. When you hire a lawyer they simply interpret so they can always find more words to spin, as a matter of fact they are actually allowed to create more words to spin. It's a pretty nefarious profession with awesome grammatical skills.

😆

****ing lawyers man. Especially divorce lawyers, I say burn those ****ers.

Originally posted by dadudemon
1. WLM movement to protest the abuses and homicides by police?

I think a "White Lives Matter" movement as you describe it here would be a misnomer, and should probably be called a "Poor Lives Matter" movement, which is a much stronger predictor of being killed by police.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
I posted about that recently. Remember it well. He was run over by a car and then hacked to death with a machete in front of about a dozen witnesses who were just standing around watching.

It's why I couldn't help but laugh when Darth Thor said if what happened to George Floyd had happened in the UK that people wouldn't have just stood by watching.

That guy had a machete. The police here dont carry guns or knives or swords.

Jeez some of you guys really do find context hard to grasp.

Oh and btw the last terror attack we had here was one guy with just a knife, and the public did intervene.

So the only laughable thing here is the false equivalencies. Like radically false.

Oh also this whole thread is laughable.

Originally posted by SquallX
Why would 2 be racist? Why is it racist if a person wants the continuing of their race? The racist thing is mostly a western ideology. Do we call Japan, China, Iran and many other countries racist?

The US is already a diverse country, but it is also true that whites, low and middle class with nothing to do with slavery and racism are being lotted as racist, and having white privileges.

We also know that those in powers have indeed try to destroy relations between whites and minorities in this country. So if an individual comes up with a good and sound reasoning, I don’t see why #2 should be racist.

Yes, we do call China and Japan racist. Japan is one of the most racist "modern" countries on the planet. Many are extremely xenophobic and it is nearly impossible to be a foreign national and become a Japanese citizen.

Also, it's racist to be concerned about who your children fall in love with, marry, and have children with - it doesn't matter. If you care about preserving traditions in your family, document them, right? But you cannot force your will on others.

Also, to your other point about why #2 is racist - the people who hold those positions are mostly jew-hating, racists. They think the Jews are having immigrants come to the use to "breed the white population" out.

Originally posted by Surtur
Well not everyone thinks that.

I've seen this being posted a few times here lately, I assume it's supposed to prove that white people are being victimised by other ethnic groups far more than when white people victimise other ethnic groups, but all it really does is prove that white people report crimes a lot more than other races. I would imagine at least part of that is down to an unwillingness on the part of non-whites to report being the victim of a white criminal, particularly in the US, where minorities are told; 'White people hate you, especially the police.' Seems that they would be far less likely to report a crime at all.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
I posted about that recently. Remember it well. He was run over by a car and then hacked to death with a machete in front of about a dozen witnesses who were just standing around watching.

It's why I couldn't help but laugh when Darth Thor said if what happened to George Floyd had happened in the UK that people wouldn't have just stood by watching.

Never learned what happened to the murdering bastard. I assume he was put in prison for life, yes?

Originally posted by samhain
I've seen this being posted a few times here lately, I assume it's supposed to prove that white people are being victimised by other ethnic groups far more than when white people victimise other ethnic groups, but all it really does is prove that white people report crimes a lot more than other races. I would imagine at least part of that is down to an unwillingness on the part of non-whites to report being the victim of a white criminal, particularly in the US, where minorities are told; 'White people hate you, especially the police.' Seems that they would be far less likely to report a crime at all.
Fact check: it isn't posted with a source.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
I posted about that recently. Remember it well. He was run over by a car and then hacked to death with a machete in front of about a dozen witnesses who were just standing around watching.

It's why I couldn't help but laugh when Darth Thor said if what happened to George Floyd had happened in the UK that people wouldn't have just stood by watching.

Never learned what happened to the murdering bastard. I assume he was put in prison for life, yes?

Originally posted by samhain
I've seen this being posted a few times here lately, I assume it's supposed to prove that white people are being victimised by other ethnic groups far more than when white people victimise other ethnic groups, but all it really does is prove that white people report crimes a lot more than other races. I would imagine at least part of that is down to an unwillingness on the part of non-whites to report being the victim of a white criminal, particularly in the US, where minorities are told; 'White people hate you, especially the police.' Seems that they would be far less likely to report a crime at all.
Fact check: it isn't posted with a source link.

Originally posted by samhain
I've seen this being posted a few times here lately, I assume it's supposed to prove that white people are being victimised by other ethnic groups far more than when white people victimise other ethnic groups, but all it really does is prove that white people report crimes a lot more than other races. I would imagine at least part of that is down to an unwillingness on the part of non-whites to report being the victim of a white criminal, particularly in the US, where minorities are told; 'White people hate you, especially the police.' Seems that they would be far less likely to report a crime at all.

The whole statistics that this is based on are very interesting actually, they show a significant segregation between whites and blacks in particularly. You are generally most likely to be a victim of a crime by someone your race, but interestingly latinos and asians are much more likely to be victimized by white people than you might expect looking just at blacks and whites. There's a lot of ways to interpret it, but I would agree that the one that a lot of people who are against the Black Lives Matter movement use it isn't a very informative way to use them.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Fact check: it isn't posted with a source link.

It does actually have a source in it, it is printed at the bottom under the chart, and you can follow it, the numbers are accurate, they are just portrayed in a manner to make a specific partisan point.

Originally posted by samhain
I've seen this being posted a few times here lately, I assume it's supposed to prove that white people are being victimised by other ethnic groups far more than when white people victimise other ethnic groups, but all it really does is prove that white people report crimes a lot more than other races. I would imagine at least part of that is down to an unwillingness on the part of non-whites to report being the victim of a white criminal, particularly in the US, where minorities are told; 'White people hate you, especially the police.' Seems that they would be far less likely to report a crime at all.

No, it just shows blacks commit more violence against whites than the other way around.

I wouldn't say we're victimized. We're 61% of the population, we still commit a large portion of crimes due to being the majority.

Originally posted by Surtur
No, it just shows blacks commit more violence against whites than the other way around.

How so? Does reported crime equate to all crime?

Originally posted by Artol
The whole statistics that this is based on are very interesting actually, they show a significant segregation between whites and blacks in particularly. You are generally most likely to be a victim of a crime by someone your race, but interestingly latinos and asians are much more likely to be victimized by white people than you might expect looking just at blacks and whites. There's a lot of ways to interpret it, but I would agree that the one that a lot of people who are against the Black Lives Matter movement use it isn't a very informative way to use them.

I laughed at 'multiple offenders of various races', like in a John Carpenter movie.

Originally posted by samhain
How so? Does reported crime equate to all crime?

It's the data we have to go by.

And herein lies the problem. You're going to say they report it less because they are afraid of the cops, I assume?

Originally posted by Surtur
I wouldn't say we're victimized. We're 61% of the population, we still commit a large portion of crimes due to being the majority.
Most honest thing, I've ever seen you post, excellent Surt. I have hope for you as a human.